iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09618
Ice-sheet acceleration driven by melt supply variability | Nature
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ice-sheet acceleration driven by melt supply variability

Nature volume 468, pages 803–806 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Increased ice velocities in Greenland1 are contributing significantly to eustatic sea level rise. Faster ice flow has been associated with ice–ocean interactions in water-terminating outlet glaciers2 and with increased surface meltwater supply to the ice-sheet bed inland. Observed correlations between surface melt and ice acceleration2,3,4,5,6 have raised the possibility of a positive feedback in which surface melting and accelerated dynamic thinning reinforce one another7, suggesting that overall warming could lead to accelerated mass loss. Here I show that it is not simply mean surface melt4 but an increase in water input variability8 that drives faster ice flow. Glacier sliding responds to melt indirectly through changes in basal water pressure9,10,11, with observations showing that water under glaciers drains through channels at low pressure or through interconnected cavities at high pressure12,13,14,15. Using a model that captures the dynamic switching12 between channel and cavity drainage modes, I show that channelization and glacier deceleration rather than acceleration occur above a critical rate of water flow. Higher rates of steady water supply can therefore suppress rather than enhance dynamic thinning16, indicating that the melt/dynamic thinning feedback is not universally operational. Short-term increases in water input are, however, accommodated by the drainage system through temporary spikes in water pressure. It is these spikes that lead to ice acceleration, which is therefore driven by strong diurnal melt cycles4,14 and an increase in rain and surface lake drainage events8,17,18 rather than an increase in mean melt supply3,4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Properties of a single conduit.
Figure 2: Steady-state drainage systems.
Figure 3: Idealized seasonal evolution of the drainage system.
Figure 4: Temporal variations in water input.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rignot, E. & Kanagaratnam, P. Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 311, 986–990 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Joughin, I. et al. Seasonal speedup along the western flank of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 320, 781–783 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zwally, H. J. et al. Surface-melt induced acceleration of Greenland ice-sheet flow. Science 5579, 218–222 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. van de Wal, R. S. W. et al. Large and rapid melt-induced velocity changes in the ablation zone of the Greenland ice sheet. Science 321, 111–113 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd, A. et al. Greenland ice sheet motion coupled with daily melting in late summer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L01501 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartholomew, I. et al. Seasonal evolution of subglacial drainage and acceleration in a Greenland outlet glacier. Nature Geosci. 3, 408–411 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parizek, B. R. & Alley, R. B. Implications of increased Greenland surface melt under global-warming scenarios: ice-sheet simulations. Quat. Sci. Rev. 23, 1013–1027 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartholomaus, T. C., Anderson, R. S. & Anderson, S. P. Response of glacier basal motion to transient water storage. Nature Geosci. 1, 33–37 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iken, A. & Bindschadler, R. A. Combined measurements of subglacial water pressure and surface velocity of Findelengletscher, Switzerland: conclusions about drainage system and sliding mechanism. J. Glaciol. 32, 101–119 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iverson, N. R., Baker, R. W. & Hooke, R. LeB., Hanson, B. & Jansson, P. Coupling between a glacier and a soft bed: I. A relation between effective pressure and local shear stress determined from till elasticity. J. Glaciol. 45, 31–40 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoof, C. The effect of cavitation on glacier sliding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 461, 609–627 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamb, B. et al. Glacier surge mechanism: 1982–1983 surge of Variegated Glacier, Alaska. Science 227, 469–479 (1985)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iken, A., Echelmeyer, K. A., Harrison, W. D. & Funk, M. Mechanisms of fast flow in Jakobshavns Isbrae, Greenland, part I: measurements of temperature and water level in deep boreholes. J. Glaciol. 39, 15–25 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hubbard, B., Sharp, M. J., Willis, I. C., Nielsen, M. K. & Smart, C. C. Borehole water-level variations and the structure of the subglacial hydrological system of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Valais, Switzerland. J. Glaciol. 41, 572–583 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lappegard, G., Kohler, J., Jackson, M. & Hagen, J. O. Characteristics of subglacial drainage system deduced from load-cell measurements. J. Glaciol. 52, 137–147 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Magnusson, E., Björnsson, H., Rott, H. & Palsson, F. Reduced glacier sliding caused by persistent drainage from a subglacial lake. Cryosphere 4, 13–20 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Howat, I. M., Tulaczyk, S., Waddington, E. & Björnsson, H. Dynamic controls on glacier basal motion inferred from surface ice motion. J. Geophys. Res. 113, F03015 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Das, S. B. et al. Fracture propagation to the base of the Greenland ice sheet during supraglacial lake drainage. Science 320, 778–781 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Röthlisberger, H. Water pressure in intra- and subglacial channels. J. Glaciol. 11, 177–203 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nye, J. F. Water flow in glaciers: jökulhlaups, tunnels and veins. J. Glaciol. 17, 181–207 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walder, J. Hydraulics of subglacial cavities. J. Glaciol. 32, 439–445 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamb, B. Glacier surge mechanism based on linked cavity configuration of the basal water conduit system. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 9083–9100 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fowler, A. C. Sliding with cavity formation. J. Glaciol. 33, 255–267 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lüthi, M., Funk, M., Iken, A., Gogineni, S. & Truffer, M. Mechanisms of fast flow in Jakobshavns Isbrae, Greenland, part III: measurements of ice deformation, temperature and cross-borehole conductivity in boreholes to the bedrock. J. Glaciol. 48, 369–385 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hewitt, I. J. & Fowler, A. C. Seasonal waves on glaciers. Hydrol. Process. 22, 3919–3930 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clarke, G. K. C. Lumped-element analysis of subglacial hydraulic circuits. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 17547–17559 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hewitt, I. J. & Fowler, A. C. Melt channelization in ascending mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B06210 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuenemann, K. C. & Cassano, J. J. Changes in synoptic weather patterns and Greenland precipitation in the 20th and 21st centuries: 2. Analysis of 21st century atmospheric changes using self-organizing maps. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D05108 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarasov, L. & Peltier, W. R. Terminating the 100 kyr ice age cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 21665–21693 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai, V. C. & Rice, J. R. A model for turbulent hydraulic fracture and application to crack propagation at glacier beds. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F03007 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to G. Clarke, T. Creyts, G. Flowers, I. Hewitt, R. Hindmarsh, M. Jellinek and V. Radić for comments on the manuscript, and to C. Koziol and M. Jaffrey for discussions. Financial support was provided by the Canada Research Chairs Program, NSERC Discovery Grant 357193-08 and the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Science through the Polar Climate Stability Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada,

    Christian Schoof

Authors
  1. Christian Schoof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schoof.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary information and Data, supplementary Figures 1-12 with legends and additional references. (PDF 1861 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Formation of a subglacial drainage net - Spontaneous formation of a drainage network at melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1), remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution, panel c) shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time. (MPG 2433 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Drainage realignment (1) - Realignment of drainage system from a steady state with melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1), changed to reduced melt input m = .66 cm day^(-1). Remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution, panel c) shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time. (MPG 2617 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

Drainage realignment (2) - Realignment of drainage system from a steady state with melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1), changed to reduced melt input m = 1 cm day^(-1). Remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution, panel c) shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time. (MPG 4688 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

Oscillatory water input (1) - Response of drainage system to variable water input, starting with steady state with melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1). Remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution. Black line in panel c) shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time, blue line shows rate of water supply. (MPG 1423 kb)

Supplementary Movie 5

Oscillatory water input (2) - Response of drainage system to variable water input, starting with steady state with melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1). Remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution. Black line in panel c) shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time, blue line shows rate of melt supply. (MPG 872 kb)

Supplementary Movie 6

Localized water input - Response of drainage system to variable water input, starting with steady state with melt input rate m = 10 cm day^(-1). Remaining parameter values given in Supplementary Information. Panel a) shows conduit size, panel b) shows effective pressure distribution. Red dots indicate location of water input events. Water input is locally raised to 50 times the background rate, mimicking for instance a lake drainage event. (MPG 581 kb)

Supplementary Movie 7

Seasonal cycle - Response of drainage system to seasonal cycle. Remaining parameter values given in supplementary information. Panel a shows conduit size, panel b shows effective pressure distribution. Black line in panel c shows mean effective pressure against time, with red dot indicating current time, blue line shows rate of water supply. (MPG 1413 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoof, C. Ice-sheet acceleration driven by melt supply variability. Nature 468, 803–806 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09618

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing