iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02842
Modelling the recent common ancestry of all living humans | Nature
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Modelling the recent common ancestry of all living humans

Abstract

If a common ancestor of all living humans is defined as an individual who is a genealogical ancestor of all present-day people, the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for a randomly mating population would have lived in the very recent past1,2,3. However, the random mating model ignores essential aspects of population substructure, such as the tendency of individuals to choose mates from the same social group, and the relative isolation of geographically separated groups. Here we show that recent common ancestors also emerge from two models incorporating substantial population substructure. One model, designed for simplicity and theoretical insight, yields explicit mathematical results through a probabilistic analysis. A more elaborate second model, designed to capture historical population dynamics in a more realistic way, is analysed computationally through Monte Carlo simulations. These analyses suggest that the genealogies of all living humans overlap in remarkable ways in the recent past. In particular, the MRCA of all present-day humans lived just a few thousand years ago in these models. Moreover, among all individuals living more than just a few thousand years earlier than the MRCA, each present-day human has exactly the same set of genealogical ancestors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: World map viewed as a ten-node graph.
Figure 2: Geography and migration routes of the simulated model.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wachter, K. W. in Genealogical Demography (eds Dyke, B. & Morrill, W. T.) 85–93 (Academic, New York, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, J. T. Recent common ancestors of all present-day individuals. Adv. Appl. Probab. 31, 1002–1026, 1027–1038 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Derrida, B., Manrubia, S. C. & Zanette, D. H. On the genealogy of a population of biparental individuals. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 303–315 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingman, M., Kaessmann, H., Pääbo, S. & Gyllensten, U. Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans. Nature 408, 708–713 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomson, R., Pritchard, J. K., Shen, P., Oefner, P. J. & Feldman, M. W. Recent common ancestry of human Y chromosomes: Evidence from DNA sequence data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7360–7365 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hudson, R. R. in Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology (eds Harvey, P. H. & Partridge, L.) 1–44 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stannard, D. E. American Holocaust: Columbus and the Conquest of the New World (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. US National Office of Vital Statistics, Death Rates by Age, Race, and Sex, United States, 1900–1953, Vital Statistics—Special Reports Vol. 43 (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pletcher, S. D. Model fitting and hypothesis testing for age-specific mortality data. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 430–439 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno, S. The Malthusian parameter of ascents: What prevents the exponential increase of one's ancestors? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15276–15278 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Derrida, B., Manrubia, S. C. & Zanette, D. H. Distribution of repetitions of ancestors in genealogical trees. Physica A 281, 1–16 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiuf, C. & Hein, J. On the number of ancestors to a DNA sequence. Genetics 147, 1459–1468 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, R. Tasmanian archaeology: Establishing the sequences. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 24, 423–446 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzhugh, W. W. & Chausonnet, V. (eds) Crossroads of Continents: Cultures of Siberia and Alaska (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, 1988)

  15. Bonné-Tamir, B. et al. Maternal and paternal lineages of the Samaritan isolate: Mutation rates and time to most recent common male ancestor. Ann. Hum. Genet. 67, 153–164 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton, N. E., Harris, D. E., Yee, S. & Lew, R. Pingelap and Mokil atolls: Migration. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 23, 339–349 (1971)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoerder, D. Cultures in Contact: World Migrations in the Second Millennium (Duke Univ. Press, Durham, North Carolina, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Zerjal, T. et al. The genetic legacy of the Mongols. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 717–721 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss, K. M. & Maruyama, T. Archeology, population genetics and studies of human racial ancestry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 44, 31–50 (1976)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward, R. H. & Neel, J. V. Gene frequencies and microdifferentiation among the Makiritare indians. IV. A comparison of a genetic network with ethnohistory and migration matrices; a new index of genetic isolation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22, 538–561 (1970)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jorde, L. B. in Current Developments in Anthropological Genetics (eds Mielke, J. H. & Crawford, M. H.) 135–208 (Plenum, New York, 1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Notohara, M. The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured populations. J. Math. Biol. 29, 59–75 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkinson-Herbots, H. M. Genealogy and subpopulation differentiation under various models of population structure. J. Math. Biol. 37, 535–585 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Hey, J. & Machado, C. A. The study of structured populations—new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 535–543 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research of D.L.T.R. was supported by the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas L. T. Rohde.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods A

This file contains additional Methods (Further explanation and derivations of mathematical results) and an extra reference. (PDF 115 kb)

Supplementary Methods B

This file contains additional Methods (further details of the computational model), Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 1 and extra references. (PDF 196 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohde, D., Olson, S. & Chang, J. Modelling the recent common ancestry of all living humans. Nature 431, 562–566 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02842

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing