iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01532070
Suffering and damage in Catholic sexuality | Journal of Religion and Health Skip to main content
Log in

Suffering and damage in Catholic sexuality

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests there may be a probable correlation between Catholic sexual orthodoxy and pathology in various Catholic cultures of the United States. There exists no empirically valid documentation suggesting the need for scientific research.

In a series of private interviews conducted anonymously with religious and clinical professionals and a limited sample of lay opinion, there was near unanimous support for the idea of research linking sexual orthodoxy and pathology in the Catholic tradition, since the majority interviewed believe it is an undocumented fact based on clinical-pastoral observation and human experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinsey, A.; Pomerov, W.; Martin, C.; and Gebhard, P.,Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masters, W., and Johnson, V., “The Role of Religion in Sexual Dysfunction.” In Calderone, M., ed.,Sexuality and Human Values. New York, Association Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masters, W., “On the Myths of Sex,” guest lecture at Potsdam State University, New York, September 14, 1984.

  4. Bullough, V.,Sexual Variance in Society and History. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy, F., “Sex and the Catholic Church,”Atlantia Monthly, 1981,247, 2, 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bullough, V. and Bullough, B., “Why the Hostility to Sex?” InSin, Sickness and Sanity: A History of Sexual Attitudes. New York, New American Library, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy, E., “The Guilt Machine.” InThe People Are the Church. New York. Image Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colton, H., “A Personal View of the Sex Revolution.” In Bullough, V., ed.,Frontiers of Sex Research. Buffalo, Prometheus, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson, J.,Embodiment: An Approach to Sexuality and Christian Theology. Minneapolis, Augsburg, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz, P., “Tolerance versus Repression,”Humanist, 1972,32, 3, 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foucault, M., “The Repressive Hypothesis.” InThe History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York, Vintage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chevasse, P.,Physical Life of Man and Woman: Or Advice to Both Sexes. Cincinnati, National Publishing Company, 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  14. Küng, H.,Eternal Life? Life After Death as a Medical, Philosophical and Theological Problem, New York, Doubleday, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Money, J., “Erotic Sex and Imagery in Sexual Hangups,” In Bullough, ed.,The Frontiers of Sex Research, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patton, M., “Masturbation from Judaism to Victorianism.”J. Religion and Health. 1985,24, 2, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MacNutt, F.,Healing. Notre Dame, Ave Maria Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Curran, C.,Transition and Tradition in Moral Theology. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dwyer, V., “Spirituality in the Eighties,” keynote address at annual Religious Education Congress, Ogdensburg, New York, September 11, 1982.

  20. Kennedy,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dominian, J.,The Church and The Sexual Revolution. New Jersey, Dimension, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patton, M., “Twentieth-Century Attitudes Toward Masturbation,”J. Religion and Health, 1986,25, 4, 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prescott, J., “Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence,”The Futurist, 1975,9, 2, 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patton, “Twentieth-Century Attitudes Toward Masturbation,”op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon, J., “On Religious-Sexual Orthodoxy and Pathology,” letter to National Humanities Center Concerning Proposal for Research, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, August 20, 1985.

  26. Suggs, R., and Marshall, D., “Anthropological Perspectives on Human Sexual Behavior.” In Suggs, R., and Marshall, D., eds.,Human Sexual Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tannahall, R.,Sex in History. New York, Stein and Day, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Greer, G., “Chastity as a Form of Birth Control.” InSex and Destiny. New York, Harper and Row, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greeley, A., “Sex and Authority.” InAmerian Catholics Since the Council: An Unauthorized Report. Chicago, Thomas More Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schulte, J., “Roman Catholic Views of Sexuality.” In Holland, J., ed.,Religion and Sexuality: Judaic-Christian Viewpoints in the U.S.A. San Francisco, Association of Sexologists, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kreich, K., “A Firsthand Report on the Current Crisis in Catholic Sexual Morality.” In Bockle, F., and Pohier, J., eds.,Sexuality in Contemporary Catholicism. New York, Seaburg, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Catoir, J., “Is the Church Unforgiving (About Sex)?”America, 1985,152, 2, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Breen, J., “Contraception: Burdens Unbearable,”National Catholic Reporter, 17, 16, 38.

  34. Valentini, N., and Meglie, C.,Sex and the Confessional. New York, Stein and Day, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lohkamp, N.,The Commandments and the New Morality. Cincinnati, St. Anthony Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hendrickson, P.,Seminary: A Search. New York, Summit, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Patton, M.,Masturbation in the American Catholic Church. Research Abstracts Microfilms International, Inc., Ann Arbor, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boswell, J.,Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  40. McNaught, B.:A Disturbed Peace. Washington, D.C., Dignity, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Maguire, D., “The Morality of Homosexual Marriage.” In Nugent, R., ed.,A Challenge to Love: Gay and Lesbian Catholics in the Church. New York, Crossroad, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Francoeur, A. and Francoeur, R.,Hot and Cool Sex: Cultures in Conflict. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reuther, R.,Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology. Boston, Beacon, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Adorno, T.; Frenkel-Brunswick, E.; Levinson, D.; and Sanford, R.,The Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Queen, S., and Habenstein, R.,The Family in Various Cultures. Philadelphia, Harper and Row, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kramer, H., and Sprenger, J.,Malleus Maleficarum, Montague Summers, trans. New York, Dover, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bokenkotter, T.,A Concise History of the Catholic Church. New York, Doubleday, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weinberg, M.; Dwenson, R.; and Hammersmith, S., “Sexual Autonomy and the Status of Women: Models of Female Sexuality in U.S. Sex Manuals from 1950–1980,”Social Problems, 1983,30, 3, 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Curran, C., “Sex is a Neuralgic Subject in Catholicism,” letter to sex researcher at Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C., April 2, 1982.

  50. Greeley, A., “American Catholics—Ten Years Later,”Critic, 1975,33, 1, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bokenkotter,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  52. Patton, M., “Some Folk and Scientific Observations on the Probable Correlation Between Sexual Orthodoxy and Pathology in Catholicism,” an unpublished report, Ogdensburg, N.Y., 1985.

  53. Ibid. Patton, M., “Some Folk and Scientific Observations on the Probable Correlation Between Sexual Orthodoxy and Pathology in Catholicism,” an unpublished report, Ogdensburg, N.Y., 1985.

  54. Patton, M., and Brown, F., “Dimensions of Catholic Sexuality: A Psycho-Anthropological Perspective,” unpublished report, Mansfield, Ohio, and Oneonta State University, Oneonta, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kennedy,op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Michael S. Patton, Ph.D., is an anthropologist concerned with sex research in society, history, and religion. He lives in Mansfield, Ohio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patton, M.S. Suffering and damage in Catholic sexuality. J Relig Health 27, 129–142 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01532070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01532070

Keywords

Navigation