Abstract
Auditory event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and reaction times were, analyzed in a selective attention task in which subjects attended to tone pips presented at high rates-Xinterstimulua intervals [ISIs] of 40-200 msec). Subjects responded to infrequent target tones of a specified frequency (250 or 4000 Hz) and location (left or right ear) that were louder than otherwise identical tones presented randomly to the left and right ears. Negative difference (Nd) waves were isolated by subtracting ERPs to tones with no target features from ERPs to the same tones when they shared target location, frequency, or both frequency and location cues. Nd waves began 60-70 msec after tone onset and lasted until 252–350 msec after tone onset, even for tones with single attended cues. The duration of Nd waves exceeded the ISIs between successive tones, implying that several stimuli underwent concurrent analysis. Nd waves associated with frequency processing had scalp distributions different from those associated with location processing, implying that the features were analyzed in distinct cortical areas. Nd waves specific to auditory feature conjunction were isolated. These began at latencies of 110–120 msec, some 30-40 msec after the Nds to single features. The relative timing of the different Nd waves suggests that auditory feaure conjunction begins after a brief parallel analysis of individual features but before feature analysis is complete.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alain, C., Achim, A., & Richer, F. (in press). Perceptual context and the auditory selective attention effect on event-related brain potentials.Psychophysiology.
Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (in press). Auditory streaming modulates the effects of pretarget tones on detection speed and accuracy during selective listening.Perception & Psychophysics.
Alho, K., Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., &Näätänen, R. (1989). Event-related brain potentials reflecting processing of relevant and irrelevant stimuli during selective listening.Psychophysiology,26, 514–528.
Briand, K. A., &Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 228–241,
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.Journal of Neuroscience,11, 2383–2402.
Hansen, J. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,49, 277–290.
Hansen, J. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Selective attention to multidimensional auditory stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 1–19,
Hansen, J. C., &Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cuing on event-related potentials during auditory attention.Psychophysiology,21, 394–405.
Harter, M. R., Aine, C., &Schroeder, C. (1982). Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials.Neuropsychologia,4, 421–438.
Knight, R. T., Singh, J., &Woods, D. L. (1989). Pre-movement parietal lobe input to human sensori-motor cortex.Brain Research,498, 190–194.
Laberge, D. (1990). Thalamic and cortical mechanisms of attention suggested by recent positron emission tomographic experiments.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2, 358–372.
Liberman, A. M., &Mattingly, I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception.Science,243, 489–494.
Mccarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.
Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.Annals of Neurology,28, 597–613.
Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function.Behavioral Brain Sciences,13, 201–288.
Posner, M. L., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., &Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain.Science,240, 1627–1631.
Previc, F. H., &Harter, M. R. (1982). Electrophysiological and behavioral indicants of selective attention to multifeature gratings.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 465–472.
Quinlan, P. T., &Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjuction searches.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 455–472.
Ruchkin, D. S. (1990). Comments on the editorial policy on analysis of variance.Psychophysiology,24, 476–477.
Scharf, B., &Houtsma, A. J. M. (1986). Audition n. Loudness, pitch, localization, aural distortion, pathology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception & psychophysics: Vol 6. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 15:1–60). New York: Wiley.
Suga, N., Niwa, H., Taniguchi, I., &Margoliash, D. (1987). The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: Adaptation for echolocation.Journal of Neurophysiology,58, 643–654.
Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration model of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Woldorff, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,79, 170–191.
Woods, D. L. (1990). The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. In J. W. Rohrbaugh, R. Johnson, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.),Event-related brain potentials: Issues and interdisciplinary vantages (pp. 178–209). New York: Oxford University Press.
Woods, D. L., Alain, C., Covarrubias, D., & Zaidel, O. (in press). Frequency-related differences in the speed of human auditory processingHearing Research.
Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., &Alho, K. (1991). Brain potential signs of feature processing during auditory selective attention.Neuro Report,2, 189–192.
Woods, D. L., Alho, K., & Algazi, A. (in press-a). Intermodality selective attention: Evidence for processing in tonotopic and nontonotopic auditory fields.Psychophysiology.
woods, D. L., Alho, K., & Algazi, A. (in press-b). Stages of auditory feature conjunction: An event-related brain potential study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Woods, D. L., &Clay Worth, C. C. (1985). Click spatial position influences middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MAEPs) in humans.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,60, 122–129.
Yund, E. W., &Efron, R. (1974). Dichoptic and dichotic micropattern discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 383–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by research grants from the NIDCD and the V.A. Research Service to D.L.W,, and by a FCAR postdoctoral fellowship to C.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, D.L., Alain, C. Feature processing during high-rate auditory selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 391–402 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206782
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206782