iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691
The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Fertility Clinic Attendees in the Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the Pandemic on Mental Health in Ethnically Diverse Mothers: Findings from the Born in Bradford, Tower Hamlets and Newham COVID-19 Research Programmes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph20031691
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review

by
Leuconoe Grazia Sisti
1,2,*,
Danilo Buonsenso
1,3,4,
Umberto Moscato
1,3,
Gianfranco Costanzo
2 and
Walter Malorni
1
1
Center for Global Health Research and Studies, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), 00153 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologiche di Base, Cliniche Intensivologiche e Perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 1691; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691
Submission received: 31 August 2022 / Revised: 25 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 17 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social and Structural Determinants of Health in Migrants and Ethnic Minorities—Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Advancement in the Times of COVID-19)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Culture, religion and health are closely intertwined, profoundly affecting people’s attitudes and behaviors as well as their conception and experience of illness and disease. In order to analyze the impact of religion in the current COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a literature review investigating both the scientific and grey literature on the topic. COVID-19 outbreaks reported in pilgrimages and religious ceremonies around the world—especially in the first wave of the pandemic wave—and the role played by religion in conveying culturally sensitive information about COVID-19 are some of the evidence we reviewed. Our research highlights how religions have represented, on the one hand, a risk for the spread of the virus and, on the other, a precious opportunity to engage people, and in particular minorities, in fighting the pandemic. To overcome this pandemic and to be prepared for similar ones in the future, scientists, politicians and health professionals should acknowledge the role that culture and religion play in people’s lives and how it can assist in tackling complex health challenges.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the global economic, health and social scenario. Such a challenge cannot be tackled without considering the role that the cultural and social dimensions play in influencing pandemic resilience, compliance with public health measures, and the global commitment needed to overcome this unprecedented crisis.
Among cultural dimensions, religion undoubtedly covers a prominent role. The concepts of health and disease are deeply rooted in religious beliefs and people’s beliefs and behaviors may positively or negatively influence both individual and public health. It is the case of a diverse propensity to individual lifestyle habits, namely smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, dietary patterns [1,2], anti-conservative behaviors [3], or the risk of infection spreading due to religious and traditional rituals (e.g., ritualistic bathing and mortuary rituals) [4].
Moreover, historically, infectious diseases have assumed relevant religious connotations, for instance, those of divine punishment in leprosy and Ebola outbreaks [5,6]. Especially during the first pandemic wave, religious gatherings went under the spotlight as a relevant source of the virus spread [7]. Several worship ceremonies were canceled [8] or offered through livestream by churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples [9]. However, some worship ministers and religious groups ignored the restrictions on physical distancing, claiming exemptions for faith ceremonies [10], and questioned government guidance on SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures. Some religious houses also provided the faithful with disinfection supplies, personal protective equipment and free COVID-19 testing [11] or offered themselves as vaccination sites [12,13]. Nevertheless, some faith communities embraced conspiracy theories serving as promoters of COVID-19 misinformation [14].
Literature has also flourished on the role of religion, and more widely of spirituality, in coping strategies decreasing stress and promoting psychological well-being during the pandemic period [15,16]. The faithful’s concerns in the shift from embodied to disembodied religious practices impacting not only the religious rituals per se but also the social networks entrenched in religious meetings have been pointed out [17,18].
In this scenario, we aimed to capture relevant insights about the role held by religions in the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on how religious habits and leaders have interplayed with the SARS-CoV-2 infection and its spread from the beginning of the pandemic to late 2021.

2. Materials and Methods

We performed a narrative review investigating both scientific and grey literature published on the topic from March 2020 to the 30th of September 2021. A search string was built using the keywords “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “Religion”, “religious confession”, “faith” and synonyms and variants. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were investigated and a hand-search on Google was also performed. Two researchers independently assessed all the records retrieved for their relevance to the research topic based on the abstract and the full text in two different consequential stages. Inclusion criteria were primary studies, short communications, perspectives articles and newspaper articles whose content dealt with the interplay between religion and COVID-19. Only literature published in English was considered for inclusion. Discrepancies in the selection process were solved through a consensus discussion among the two researchers.

3. Results

Sixty- one scientific articles, grey literature reports and newspaper articles were deemed relevant and narratively summarized according to the topics that emerged.
Topics identified were (1) religious pilgrimages and rituals worldwide being relevant to COVID-19 outbreaks, especially in the first pandemic wave (2) difficulties to engage the Closed Religious Communities (e.g., Haredi, Amish, etc.) in which community way of life, restrictions in using media and resistance to comply with preventive measures were identified as a significant COVID-19 risk (3) COVID-19 unofficial treatments (4) vaccine hesitancy also supported by concerns about the religious acceptability of vaccine composition or a firm interpretation of the Ramadan fasting (5) fuel of religious discrimination (6) religious communities and leaders strongly trusted in conveying COVID-19 information (7) religions playing a crucial role in coping stress and promoting mental (but also physical) well-being during the pandemic.
Literature review findings are presented and discussed here by categorizing them as risks and opportunities. The key characteristics of scientific articles and reports contributing to the different topics are reported in Table 1.

3.1. COVID-19 and Religion: Risks

3.1.1. Religious Events and COVID-19 Spread

Religious events are traditionally characterized by large numbers of people meeting in dedicated places to pray or meditate, often for several days. Some rituals include also physical contact, such as shaking hands in the “sign of peace” in Catholic churches. Thus, such events can pose a relevant risk for the spread of respiratory viruses—including SARS-CoV-2—within the community. Previous respiratory disease outbreaks have shown that this risk is real. During the 2009 H1N1 influenza A and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreaks, face-mask use was low among Muslim pilgrims and, interestingly, the outbreaks coincided with the Hajj pilgrimage [19].
COVID-19 outbreaks associated with religious events were confirmed early in the pandemic, as early as February 2020 and the risk of large-scale religious events being pandemic triggers was also highlighted in The Lancet [19].
In Albany (Georgia, USA), the SARS-CoV-2 virus infected more than 100 people who went to a funeral in February 2020, fueling an outbreak in the surrounding rural county [20]. In Arkansas, a pastor infected more than 30 attendees in a religious ceremony, leading to three related deaths and the infection of 26 other people, one of whom died [20,21]. In Saudi Arabia, returning Saudi pilgrims visiting pilgrimage sites in Iran and Iraq were suspected to be the initial source of the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 in the community [22]. Luckily, for the first time in the eight decades of the history of Muslim pilgrimage, as soon as the pandemic began to worsen, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, on 27 February 2020, placed restrictions on the inbound Umrah pilgrimage [23]. Conversely, Pakistan did not stop religious travelers at first. On 24 March 2020, Pakistan reported 990 cases, sixty percent of which being pilgrims returning from Iran [24]. The same happened in Iran, where several cases within the country and a dozen in neighboring countries were linked to large pilgrimage events [25,26]. In Greece, 48 out of 53 (90.6%) pilgrims who visited Jerusalem on 19 February 2020, tested positive [27]. In Guangzhou (China), SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in six passengers returning from a pilgrimage in Pakistan. These pilgrims had spent the previous weeks in close contact with thousands of pilgrims gathered in a masjid, without wearing facemasks, thus potentially infecting a large number of people [28]. In Malaysia, in early March 2020, about 16,000–19,000 people of different nationalities attended the Sri Petaling gathering organized by a Muslim missionary movement and held in Kuala Lumpur [29,30]. One thousand seven hundred people tested positive and, later, 35% of new COVID-19 cases reported in the country were linked to this gathering [30]. This apparently acted as the source of infection for the next two gatherings in Pakistan and India as several infected Malaysians attended those meetings [31]. Moreover, in late February 2020, another COVID-19 cluster in Malaysia originated from a Christian leadership seminar in Kuching, Sarawak (a Malaysian state in Borneo). The event has been identified as the source of 117 of the 371 COVID-19 cases in Kuching [29]. In India, as of 4 April 2020, 1023 people related to this congregation had tested positive [32]. Another outbreak in the northwestern Indian state of Punjab was linked to a 70-year-old Sikh priest who, after returning from Italy and Germany, refused self-quarantine and attended several religious meetings, including a Sikh festival attracting 300,000 people daily [33]. In the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, as of 7 May 2020, about 80% of the infections in the province resulted from three burial ceremonies in Port St. Johns, Port Elizabeth and Mthatha. In the Free State province (still in South Africa), a single religious event attended by three COVID-19-positive church leaders led to the infection of more than 80 people and the further tracing of 1600 people who may have been exposed to the virus [34].
In Italy, the high number of priests who have died of COVID-19 in the first pandemic waves (269 as of April 2021) [80] and the resulting shortage of hospital chaplains, led to nurses and doctors being appointed to give the blessing [81].
Especially in the first phases of the pandemic, COVID-19 infection rates among the ultra-orthodox Jews of Israel have been reported to be significantly high, considering the size of this group population in Israel [82]. Even if large families and crowded living conditions have been called upon for explaining this finding, participation in daily communal religious prayers (and the Jewish holiday of Purim on 9 March 2020) may also have contributed [35]. In London, about a thousand devotees of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness attended a funeral in its temple on 21 March 2020. Twenty-one of them tested positive and five died [36]. A similar outbreak occurred in Italy, in the Molise Region, after a Roma funeral [37].
A further example of the importance—for health—of a full understanding of religious and cultural contexts is offered by the ultra-orthodox community in the US who, due to cultural and social rules preventing them from using technological devices and media, was not promptly updated on the severity of the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 [38]. Similar considerations have been made for other closed religious communities (CRCs), such as the Amish/Mennonites, for whom technological restrictions, regular face-to-face worship rituals, and resistance to preventive measures (including vaccination) have raised concern about COVID-19 spread [39].

3.1.2. COVID-19 Unofficial Treatments and Vaccine Hesitancy

Another potential risk linked to religious beliefs lies in the resistance to adopting COVID-19 preventive measures (including vaccination) due to the persuasion that God’s protection is the only effective resource and in the use of unofficial treatments tied to religious beliefs. About the latter, Lebanese Christians have been described as drinking a mixture of water and sacred soil found at the grave of Maronite monk Mar Charbel (Mount Lebanon); Hindu groups have been reported hosting cow-urine drinking parties to cure COVID-19 [40].
Focusing on vaccination, even before the spread of the pandemic, several studies have shown how religion can influence vaccine hesitancy, intended as a delay in accepting or refusing vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services [83]. A case study on measles and rubella vaccine hesitancy in Zimbabwe highlighted how religious teachings that emphasize prayers as alternatives to medicines, and the lack of privacy in a religiously controlled community can reinforce the hesitancy generated by poor knowledge of vaccine safety and effectiveness among members of the Apostolic Church [84]. Regarding COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, a national survey covering 638 Arab Americans—more than half foreign-born—between May 2020 and September 2020 highlighted that only 56.7% of respondents reported an intention to be vaccinated and that 7.5% stated being frankly unlikely to receive a vaccine. Of those, 85.4% self-reported a moderate to high religiosity and women were five times more unlikely to receive the vaccine than men, suggesting that relying on religion as a coping mechanism in facing the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with possible misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines, informally spread throughout religious communities and posed additional barriers in vaccine literacy among Arab American women [41]. In the US, the “Religion and the Vaccine Survey”, conducted in March 2021 underlined that Protestants (Black, Hispanic, White evangelical and “other Protestant of color”) and Mormons were the least vaccine-receptive religious groups (share of accepters equal/less than 50%). Among these, White evangelical Protestants reported the higher share of vaccine refusers at 26%, whereas Hispanic Protestants were the most vaccine-hesitant (42%). An increase in acceptance has been observed in June 2021 [42].
Conspiracy narratives against COVID-19 vaccines tied to religious beliefs have been highlighted in Pakistan [43], but unscientific theories and COVID-19 vaccination misinformation promoted by religious leaders appeared to spare no religious belief, according to Galang [44].
Moreover, concerns about the acceptability of vaccine composition and manufacturing processes, such as porcine gelatin for Muslims and Hindus or cell lines from aborted fetuses for Christian communities, have also been expressed [45].
In addition, a firm interpretation of the practice of fasting during Ramadan, intended as “refraining from anything entering the body cavities,” has been feared to promote some reluctance to receive vaccinations during the holy month [46]. Attention has also been paid to the role of fasting in influencing the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the need for future studies to better address the topic [73,74,75].
Furthermore, the pandemic may also fuel religious discrimination [47], in particular towards Muslims and Jews [48]. Beliefs that Jews developed the virus to later gain credit and profit from the vaccine they would develop or that the pandemic is a punishment for Jewish denial of Jesus are classic examples of observed anti-Semitic attitudes [48].

3.2. COVID-19 and Religions: Opportunities

Religious meetings represent meaningful moments for believers and may be particularly important for minorities. For example, Black churches have a well-known role in promoting spiritual renewal and mental resilience and in addressing racism, especially for older African Americans [59]. A proactive engagement of religious communities and leaders may ensure both significant relief during pandemic times and proper and trusted communication on how to appropriately deal with the pandemic, also considering the increase and the strengthening in religiosity that some studies have detectedduring the pandemic [60,61].
In this regard, proactive activities have been developed in some contexts. In São Paulo, a spiritual hotline was developed in May 2020, and, during the first two weeks, 108 appointments were requested, and calls were made from Brazilian states and from Portugal [62], highlighting the resonance of the project. In the Philippines, Catholic congregations organized online ceremonies providing online counseling and guidance, and distributed free protective equipment and food to the poor and homeless people [63]. Similar support services have also been set up in Detroit [49].
An online survey conducted in March 2020 in the first quarantined community in the US, a Modern Orthodox Jewish community, showed that community organizations were more trusted than any other source of COVID-19-related information by offering concrete support, such as food delivery, social support, virtual religious services, and dissemination of COVID-19-related information [50]. Religion can be used in disseminating precautionary measures and evidence-based practices against COVID-19 [51,52], as we have already learned in defeating the Ebola epidemic in West Africa [85].
Moreover, important religious ceremonies, such as the Jewish holiday of Pesach (or Passover), Ramadan, Easter, and funerals, were organized through online platforms [76,77], underlining how religion was able to adapt to the pandemic and reinforcing the relevance of complying with public health measures in the faithful. However, this shift has not been painless. The literature highlights that the forced digitization of religious worship disrupted religious habits and practices requiring the faithful to accept not physically participating in fundamental liturgical rituals, such as the Eucharist, the passing of the peace, the burning of incense for the Christians [18,78], and the holy chants. Besides the missing of physical participation in rituals, the faithful also expressed how the impossibility to meet in religious rituals (e.g., group prayers, pilgrimages) affected their social networks, often deeply rooted in religious belonging, being only partially relieved by online worship and meetings [18]. This is even more crucial within the context of religious and ethnic minorities, for which physical participation in rituals and meetings maintains and provides a transnational source of identification, constituting an essential factor in their social network [79]. The value of physical participation also emerges in a survey performed in the United Kingdom (UK), soon after the easing of restrictive measures (July 2020). The survey, covering 939 participants of different religious backgrounds, reported on the global compliance of worship places with social distancing and the use of face masks with a general acceptance of this latter. Face masks, even if perceived as uncomfortable and reducing the singing and chanting volume, were globally tolerated, since this meant resuming the singing and chanting during communal worship [53].
Furthermore, the role of religious coping—intended as the use of “cognitive or behavioral techniques, in the face of stressful life events, which arise out of one’s religion or spirituality” [86]—in easing COVID-19 anxiety and supporting psychological well-being during the pandemic has strongly come to the fore. During the early months of the pandemic, Google searches for prayer relative to all major religions collected for 107 countries rose by 30%, reaching the highest level ever recorded and remaining 10% higher than previously throughout the entire 2020 [61]. According to the author, this finding seems to indicate more than just the mere replacing of physical churchgoing with online worship but a global, increasing demand for religion as a means to cope with adversity. An online survey covering 1250 adults in Italy underlined that the participants, and in particular women, were perceived to have poorer mental health than in the pre-pandemic period, and that spirituality and religious practices play a protective role in psychological and mental health but also for physical health [64]. In a cross-sectional study on a sample of 419 American Orthodox Jews, negative religious coping and mistrust in God have resulted to correlate strongly with higher levels of COVID-19-related negative impacts in different areas of life (e.g., sleep, diet, family, relationships, enjoying life) versus a global and better resilience of individuals with intrinsic religiosity and positive religious coping [65]. In a sample of 970 Americans between 20 and 79 years of age, negative religious coping resulted in the likelihood of being more associated with COVID-19 anxiety than positive religious coping [66]. In a survey performed on 543 residents of the United Arab Emirates, in the early stages of the pandemic, Muslims reported significantly higher levels of positive religious coping compared to their Christian counterparts, and in this group, positive religious coping was found to be inversely related to depressive symptoms and having a history of psychological disorders [67].
In this regard, particular attention is paid to the elderly, who are usually the most religious in communities [87]. Geriatric psychiatrists believe that faith may support older patients in relieving anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic [68] and female older adults have been found to have higher levels of religious coping, and lower levels of death anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic than male older adults [69]. Moreover, in older homebound adults, positive religious coping has been reported to be associated with a less suicide risk [70]. The positive impact of religion and spirituality on mental health has also been highlighted in a cross-sectional study on a sample of 200 Malaysian healthcare workers involved in the assistance of COVID-19 patients, in which positive coping was predictive of a reduction in anxiety and depression scores [71]. The lowering of psychological distress has also been reported in a more recent study on a sample of 549 caregivers (parents and other adults in childrearing roles) across Canada, United States, United Kingdom, and Australia [72]. Thus, besides the role of religions in favoring compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures, also its role in coping strategies should be further valorized by governments and institutions, as scientists and researchers advocate [30,88]. The World Health Organization is moving in this direction by recognizing the importance of chaplaincy interventions in supporting the healing process of religious patients [89].
With the launch of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, the positive role of religion in promoting adherence to COVID-19 vaccination and in elucidating moral issues that can cause vaccine skepticism in their faithful has come powerfully to the fore. The “Religion and the Vaccine Survey” (United States) underlined how faith-based approaches can be effective for hesitant and refusing groups with about 40% of vaccine-hesitant (44% in March 2021 and 38% in June 2021) and 14% (March 2021) and 19% (June 2021)of vaccine-resistant Americans who attend religious services at least a few times a year saying that faith-based approaches would make them more likely to vaccinate [42]. The South Dakota COVID-19 Impact Survey (SDSU Poll), performed in April 2021, highlighted as among people who had not received a vaccine, those spurred by a religious leader indicated nearly twice the likelihood of getting vaccinated than those invited by politicians or medical professionals [54].
The Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of The Faith has reassured Catholics about the moral legitimacy of receiving COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and production process in case of a lack of alternatives [55]. The same note also emphasizes that “the morality of vaccination depends not only on the duty to protect one’s own health, but also on the duty to pursue the common good”, especially with regard to protecting the weakest and most exposed [55]. Some Catholic churches have proposed themselves as vaccination sites [56] and in August 2021, Pope Francis urged people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 [57]. Similarly, appeals to join COVID-19 campaigns and reassurance about the religious acceptance of vaccine composition [58] have come from different religious leaders. Global faith leaders also called for rejecting vaccine nationalisms and embracing a commitment to global vaccine equity [90].

4. Limitations of the Study and the Way Forward

Our study aimed to investigate and provide an overview of key topics concerning the interplay between religion and the COVID-19 pandemic. As we conducted a narrative review, we cannot rule out that all available evidence on the topic has been considered. Moreover, the timeframe of the research has been confined to September 2021, even if some relevant latest articles have been mentioned.
While taking into account the limitations stated, some considerations arise. First, most of the literature retrieved on the topic does not provide primary data or has not been subject to peer review processes encouraging more scientific and original research to better inform healthcare practitioners and evidence-based policy-making. Further, the screened literature clearly showed a preponderance of studies led in Asian countries and the US and a lack of studies set in European countries, prompting the scientific production attention on the topic in these countries.

5. Conclusions

Our review findings plainly push for an acknowledgement of the role that religion has in facing complex health challenges and adopting a phenomenological, anthropological, and cultural approach in designing public health strategies. The knowledge of the different cultural and religious specificities and cooperation with religious leaders are crucial to ensure that all the different groups are included in health policies and engaged in health production and protection.
This can be achieved through the establishment of inter-religious and pluricultural collaborative relationships with all representatives of different religious denominations, committed to promoting communication channels providing accurate, accessible, and reliable information to members of religious and belief communities, as also highlighted by a joint Statement of the International Religious Freedom Alliance [91]. Health systems and health policy should become more sensitive to religious and cultural issues, for example, by training the health workforce and structuring cultural and religious-sensitive health pathways. In turn, religious organizations can act as intermediaries to reach out to communities that may have difficulties in accessing health services or are resistant to implementing evidence-based measures.
Such an approach is of the highest priority even in this pandemic phase, which is newly characterized by high virus circulation, especially in some countries, and where the persistence of unequal availability of COVID-19 vaccines continues. Furthermore, our review of the concerns held about vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal movements is of significant value when facing possible future pandemic challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B. and L.G.S.; literature review: L.G.S. and D.B.; first draft preparation, D.B.; draft enrichment, structuring, editing and review L.G.S.; supervision, U.M., G.C. and W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the study are available in the references of the studies included in the review.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Cristina De Rose for her contribution to the preliminary phases of the manuscript’s conceptualization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Svensson, N.H.; Hvidt, N.C.; Nissen, S.P.; Storsveen, M.M.; Hvidt, E.A.; Søndergaard, J.; Thilsing, T. Religiosity and Health-Related Risk Behaviours in a Secular Culture—Is there a Correlation? J. Relig. Health 2019, 59, 2381–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kang, M.; Park, L.Y.; Kang, S.Y.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.S. Religion and Health Behaviors in Primary Care Patients. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2020, 41, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saiz, J.; Ayllón-Alonso, E.; Sánchez-Iglesias, I.; Chopra, D.; Mills, P.J. Religiosity and Suicide: A Large-Scale International and Individual Analysis Considering the Effects of Different Religious Beliefs. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 2503–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gajurel, K.; Deresinski, S. A Review of Infectious Diseases Associated with Religious and Nonreligious Rituals. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2021, 2021, 1823957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raju, M.S.; Rao, S.P.S.S.; Govindasamy, K. Socio-medical perspectives on leprosy in Indian religions. Lepr. Rev. 2020, 91, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Manguvo, A.; Mafuvadze, B. The impact of traditional and religious practices on the spread of Ebola in West Africa: Time for a strategic shift. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2015, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mubarak, N.; Zin, C.S. Religious tourism and mass religious gatherings—The potential link in the spread of COVID-19. Current perspective and future implications. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 36, 101786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burke, D. What Churches, Mosques and Temples Are Doing to Fight the Spread of Coronavirus. CNN. Archived from the original on 14 March 2020, Retrieved 16 March 2020. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/14/world/churches-mosques-temples-coronavirus-spread/index.html (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  9. Parke, C. Churches Cancel Sunday Service, Move Online Amid Coronavirus Outbreak. Fox News. Archived from the original on 15 March 2020, Retrieved 16 March 2020, 13 March 2020. Available online: https://www.foxnews.com/us/coronavirus-update-church-sunday-service-online (accessed on 2 September 2020).
  10. The Guardian. The US Churches and Pastors Ignoring ‘Stay-at-Home’ Orders. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/05/coronavirus-churches-florida-social-distancing (accessed on 5 April 2020).
  11. Amazon Adds Jobs and Megachurch Helps with COVID-19 Testing. Religious Freedom & Business Foundation, 19 March 2020. Archived from the original on 20 March 2020. Retrieved 19 March 2020. Available online: https://religiousfreedomandbusiness.org/2/post/2020/03/amazon-adds-jobs-and-megachurch-helps-with-covid-19-testing.html (accessed on 4 May 2020).
  12. NHS South West London. Vaccination Clinics Hosted by Merton’s Religious Communities Launched to Boost Uptake. Available online: https://swlondonccg.nhs.uk/news/vaccination-clinics-hosted-by-mertons-religious-communities-launched-to-boost-uptake/ (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  13. CoHealth.org. Buddhist Temple in Braybrook and Mosque in Tottenham Newest Pop-Up Vaccination Clinics. October 2021. Available online: https://www.cohealth.org.au/media-release/buddhist-temple-in-braybrook-and-mosque-in-tottenham-newest-pop-up-vaccination-clinics/ (accessed on 6 December 2021).
  14. Du Mez, K.K. Some Evangelicals Deny the Coronavirus Threat. It’s because They Love Tough Guys. Washington Post. 2 April 2020. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/02/conservative-evangelicals-coronavirus-tough-guys/ (accessed on 20 November 2020).
  15. Ting, R.S.-K.; Yong, Y.-Y.A.; Tan, M.-M.; Yap, C.-K. Cultural Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: Religions, Illness Perception, and Perceived Stress. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 634863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lucchetti, G.; Góes, L.G.; Amaral, S.G.; Ganadjian, G.T.; Andrade, I.; Almeida, P.O.D.A.; Carmo, V.M.D.; Manso, M.E.G. Spirituality, religiosity and the mental health consequences of social isolation during COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2020, 67, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campbell, H.A. (Ed.) Religion in Quarantine: The Future of Religion in a Post-Pandemic World; Digital Religion Publications, 2020; Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/188004 (accessed on 20 November 2020).
  18. Huygens, E. Practicing Religion during a Pandemic: On Religious Routines, Embodiment, and Performativity. Religions 2021, 12, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ebrahim, S.H.; A Memish, Z. COVID-19: Preparing for superspreader potential among Umrah pilgrims to Saudi Arabia. Lancet 2020, 395, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Aschwanden, C. How ‘Superspreading’ Events Drive Most COVID-19 Spread. Scientific American. Available online: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-superspreading-events-drive-most-covid-19-spread1/ (accessed on 23 June 2020).
  21. James, A.; Eagle, L.; Phillips, C.; Hedges, D.S.; Bodenhamer, C.; Brown, R.; Wheeler, J.G.; Kirking, H. High COVID-19 Attack Rate Among Attendees at Events at a Church—Arkansas, March 2020. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Memish, Z.A.; Ahmed, Y.; Alqahtani, S.A.; Ebrahim, S.H. Pausing superspreader events for COVID-19 mitigation: International Hajj pilgrimage cancellation. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 36, 101817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ebrahim, S.H.; Memish, Z.A. Saudi Arabia’s drastic measures to curb the COVID-19 outbreak: Temporary suspension of the Umrah pilgrimage. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Badshah, S.L.; Ullah, A.; Ahmad, I.; Badshah, S.H. Spread of Novel coronavirus by returning pilgrims from Iran to Pakistan. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. A Quadri, S. COVID-19 and religious congregations: Implications for spread of novel pathogens. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wright, R. How Iran Became a New Epicenter of the Coronavirus Outbreak. The New Yorker. Available online: https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-iran-became-a-new-epicenter-of-the-coronavirus-outbreak (accessed on 28 February 2020).
  27. Pavli, A.; Smeti, P.; Papadima, K.; Andreopoulou, A.; Hadjianastasiou, S.; Triantafillou, E.; Vakali, A.; Kefaloudi, C.; Pervanidou, D.; Gogos, C.; et al. A cluster of COVID-19 in pilgrims to Israel. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gu, Y.; Lu, J.; Yang, Z. Pilgrimage and COVID-19: The risk among returnees from Muslim countries. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 95, 457–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mat, N.F.C.; Edinur, H.A.; Razab, M.K.A.A.; Safuan, S. A single mass gathering resulted in massive transmission of COVID-19 infections in Malaysia with further international spread. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tan, M.M.; Musa, A.F.; Su, T.T. The role of religion in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: The Malaysian multi-faith perspectives. Health Promot. Int. 2021, 37, daab041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Najib, M. At Least 40,000 Quarantined in India after Single Priest Spread Coronavirus. NBC News. Available online: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/least40-000-quarantined-india-after-single-priest-spread-coronavirus-n1171261 (accessed on 30 March 2020).
  32. Daim, N. Tabligh Gathering Cluster Contributes Highest Positive COVID-19 Figures. NST Online. Available online: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/04/581317/tabligh-gathering-cluster-contributes-highest-positive-covid-19-figures (accessed on 4 April 2020).
  33. Kumar, P.; Srinivasan, C. 30 Per Cent of Coronavirus Cases Linked to Delhi Mosque Event: Government. NDTV.Com. Available online: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/coronavirus-tablighi-jamaat-30-per-cent-of-coronavirus-cases-linked-to-delhi-mosque-event-government-2206163 (accessed on 4 April 2020).
  34. Jaja, I.F.; Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, C.-J.I. Social distancing: How religion, culture and burial ceremony undermine the effort to curb COVID-19 in South Africa. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1077–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zalcberg, S.; Block, S.Z. COVID-19 Amongst the Ultra-Orthodox Population in Israel: An Inside Look into the Causes of the High Morbidity Rates. Contemp. Jewry 2021, 41, 99–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tandon, L. ISKCON Reports 21 Coronavirus Cases, 5 Deaths in UK, all Had Attended Funeral Gathering. India Today. Available online: https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/iskcon-reports-21-coronavirus-cases-5-deaths-in-uk-all-had-attended-funeral-gathering-1666032-2020-04-12 (accessed on 12 April 2020).
  37. Il Messagero. Coronavirus, Nomadi Rom Organizzano un Funerale: Esplode un Focolaio di COVID a Campobasso. Il Messaggero. Available online: https://www.ilmessaggero.it/italia/nomadi_rom_focolaio_molise_coronavirus_oggi-5223348.html (accessed on 12 May 2020).
  38. Dalsheim, J. Amid COVID-19 Spike in Ultra-Orthodox Areas, History may Explain Reluctance to Restrictions. The Conversation. Available online: https://theconversation.com/amid-covid-19-spike-in-ultra-orthodox-areas-jewish-history-may-explain-reluctance-of-some-to-restrictions-147629 (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  39. Stein, R.E.; Corcoran, K.E.; Colyer, C.J.; Mackay, A.M.; Guthrie, S.K. Closed but Not Protected: Excess Deaths Among the Amish and Mennonites During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 3230–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Iqbal, Q.; Tareen, A.M.; Saleem, F. Religious cliché and COVID-19 management: A barrier for physicians. Br. J. Gen. Prac. 2020, 70, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Abouhala, S.; Hamidaddin, A.; Taye, M.; Glass, D.J.; Zanial, N.; Hammood, F.; Allouch, F.; Abuelezam, N.N. A National Survey Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Arab Americans. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2021, 9, 2188–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). Religious Identities and the Race Against the Virus. Available online: https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PRRI-IFYC-Jul-2021-Vaccine.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  43. Khan, Y.H.; Mallhi, T.H.; Alotaibi, N.H.; Alzarea, A.I.; Alanazi, A.S.; Tanveer, N.; Hashmi, F.K. Threat of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Pakistan: The Need for Measures to Neutralize Misleading Narratives. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 603–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Galang, J.R.F. Science and religion for COVID-19 vaccine promotion. J. Public Health 2021, 43, e513–e514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seale, H. Religious Concerns over Vaccine Production Methods Needn’t Be an Obstacle to Immunisation. The Conversation. 26 August 2020. Available online: https://theconversation.com/religious-concerns-over-vaccine-production-methods-neednt-be-an-obstacle-to-immunisation-145046 (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  46. Ali, S.N.; Hanif, W.; Patel, K.; Khunti, K. Ramadan and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy—A call for action. Lancet 2021, 397, 1443–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sarkar, S. Religious discrimination is hindering the COVID-19 response. BMJ 2020, 369, m2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. United Nations Press Release. Rise in Antisemitic Hatred during COVID-19 Must be Countered with Tougher Measures, Says UN Expert. 17 April 2020. Available online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2020/04/rise-antisemitic-hatred-during-covid-19-must-be-countered-tougher-measures?LangID=E&NewsID=25800 (accessed on 15 August 2020).
  49. Modell, S.M.; Kardia, S.L.R. Religion as a Health Promoter During the 2019/2020 COVID Outbreak: View from Detroit. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2243–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Weinberger-Litman, S.L.; Litman, L.; Rosen, Z.; Rosmarin, D.H.; Rosenzweig, C. A Look at the First Quarantined Community in the USA: Response of Religious Communal Organizations and Implications for Public Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2269–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Levin, J. The Faith Community and the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution? J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2215–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Galiatsatos, P.; Monson, K.; Oluyinka, M.; Negro, D.; Hughes, N.; Maydan, D.; Golden, S.H.; Teague, P.; Hale, W.D. Community Calls: Lessons and Insights Gained from a Medical–Religious Community Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2256–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ho, K.M.A.; Baggaley, R.F.; Stone, T.C.; Hogan, Á.; Kabir, Y.; Johnson, C.; Merrifield, R.; Lovat, L.B. Face Mask Acceptability for Communal Religious Worship During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Results from the CONFESS Study. J. Relig. Health 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wiltse, D.; South Dakota State University. Messaging from Religious Leaders Most Effective at Encouraging South Dakotans to Get Vaccinated. May 2021. Available online: https://www.sdstate.edu/news/2021/05/messaging-religious-leaders-most-effective-encouraging-south-dakotans-get-vaccinated (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  55. Note on the Morality of Using Some Anti-COVID-19 Vaccines. 21 December 2020. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Available online: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20201221_nota-vaccini-anticovid_en.html (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  56. Lacsa, J.E.M. COVID-19 vaccination program: The Catholic Church’s all-time support to the government when it is for the common good. J. Public Health 2021, 44, e320–e321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vatican News. Pope Francis Urges People to Get Vaccinated against COVID-19. Available online: https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covid-19-vaccines-act-of-love.html (accessed on 18 August 2021).
  58. Asad Mirza @Marginalia Jan 10, 2021, 17:46 IST. Coronavirus Vaccine: Is It Halal or Not? Times of India Blog. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/marginalia/coronavirus-vaccine-is-it-halal-or-not-28978/ (accessed on 10 January 2021).
  59. DeSouza, F.; Parker, C.B.; Spearman-McCarthy, E.V.; Duncan, G.N.; Black, R.M.M. Coping with Racism: A Perspective of COVID-19 Church Closures on the Mental Health of African Americans. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2020, 8, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gecewicz, C. Few Americans Say Their House of Worship Is Open, but a Quarter Say Their Faith Has Grown amid Pandemic. Pew Research Center. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/30/few-americans-say-their-house-of-worship-is-open-but-a-quarter-say-their-religious-faith-has-grown-amid-pandemic/ (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  61. Bentzen, J.S. In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2021, 192, 541–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ribeiro, M.R.C.; Damiano, R.F.; Marujo, R.; Nasri, F.; Lucchetti, G. The role of spirituality in the COVID-19 pandemic: A spiritual hotline project. J. Public Health 2020, 42, 855–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Del Castillo, F.A.; Biana, H.T.; Joaquin, J.J. ChurchInAction: The role of religious interventions in times of COVID-19. J. Public Health 2020, 42, 633–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Coppola, I.; Rania, N.; Parisi, R.; Lagomarsino, F. Spiritual Well-Being and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 626944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pirutinsky, S.; Cherniak, A.D.; Rosmarin, D.H. COVID-19, Mental Health, and Religious Coping Among American Orthodox Jews. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2288–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. DeRossett, T.; LaVoie, D.J.; Brooks, D. Religious Coping Amidst a Pandemic: Impact on COVID-19-Related Anxiety. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 3161–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Thomas, J.; Barbato, M. Positive Religious Coping and Mental Health among Christians and Muslims in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Religions 2020, 11, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Koenig, H.G. Ways of Protecting Religious Older Adults from the Consequences of COVID-19. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2020, 28, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rababa, M.; Hayajneh, A.A.; Bani-Iss, W. Association of Death Anxiety with Spiritual Well-Being and Religious Coping in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Suresh, M.E.; McElroy, S.E.; Shannonhouse, L.R. Predicting Suicide Risk in Older Homebound Adults during COVID-19: The Role of Religious Coping. J. Psychol. Christ. 2020, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar]
  71. Chow, S.; Francis, B.; Ng, Y.; Naim, N.; Beh, H.; Ariffin, M.; Yusuf, M.; Lee, J.; Sulaiman, A. Religious Coping, Depression and Anxiety among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Malaysian Perspective. Healthcare 2021, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sen, H.E.; Colucci, L.; Browne, D.T. Keeping the Faith: Religion, Positive Coping, and Mental Health of Caregivers During COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 2022, 12, 6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mosaferchi, S.; Sharif-Paghaleh, E.; Mortezapour, A.; Heidarimoghadam, R. Letter to the Editor: The first Ramadan during COVID-19 pandemic: 1.8 billion Muslims should fast or not? Metabolism 2020, 108, 154253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Javanmard, S.H.; Otroj, Z. Ramadan fasting and risk of COVID-19. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hanif, S.; Ali, S.N.; Hassanein, M.; Khunti, K.; Hanif, W. Managing People with Diabetes Fasting for Ramadan During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A South Asian Health Foundation Update. Diabet. Med. 2020, 37, 1094–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Imber-Black, E. Rituals in the Time of COVID-19: Imagination, Responsiveness, and the Human Spirit. Fam. Process. 2020, 59, 912–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Frei-Landau, R. “When the going gets tough, the tough get—Creative”: Israeli Jewish religious leaders find religiously innovative ways to preserve community members’ sense of belonging and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 2020, 12, S258–S260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Isetti, G. “Online You Will Never Get the Same Experience, Never”: Minority Perspectives on (Digital) Religious Practice and Embodiment during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Religions 2022, 13, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Otieno, M.; Nkenyereye, L. Effects of Pandemics on Migrant Communities: Analysis of Existing Sources. Religions 2021, 12, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ansa. COVID: 269 Priests Died in One Year. ANSA.it. Available online: https://www.ansa.it/english/news/vatican/2021/04/01/covid-269-priests-died-in-one-year_d0f1a31e-c1ef-491c-88fc-cece4199403b.html (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  81. Chirico, F.; Nucera, G. An Italian Experience of Spirituality from the Coronavirus Pandemic. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2193–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Malach, G.; Cahaner, L. Statistical Report on Orthodox Society in Israel 2020. Center for Religion, Nation and State. The Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research. Jerusalem, 2021. Available online: https://en.idi.org.il/haredi/2020/?chapter=34277 (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  83. Butler, R. Vaccine Hesitancy: What It Means and What We Need to Know in Order to Tackle It. GVIRF Johannesburg. 2016. Available online: https://www.who.int/immunization/research/forums_and_initiatives/1_RButler_VH_Threat_Child_Health_gvirf16.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  84. Machekanyanga, Z.; Ndiaye, S.; Gerede, R.; Chindedza, K.; Chigodo, C.; Shibeshi, M.E.; Goodson, J.; Daniel, F.; Zimmerman, L.; Kaiser, R. Qualitative Assessment of Vaccination Hesitancy Among Members of the Apostolic Church of Zimbabwe: A Case Study. J. Relig. Health 2017, 56, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Marshall, K.; Smith, S. Religion and Ebola: Learning from experience. Lancet 2015, 386, e24–e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tix, A.P.; Frazier, P.A. The use of religious coping during stressful life events: Main effects, moderation, and mediation. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1998, 66, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pew Research Center. Report: The Age Gap in Religion Around the World. June 2018. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/06/13/the-age-gap-in-religion-around-the-world/ (accessed on 5 June 2021).
  88. Hong, B.A.; Handal, P.J. Science, Religion, Government, and SARS-CoV-2: A Time for Synergy. J. Relig. Health 2020, 59, 2263–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Carey, L.B.; Cohen, J. The Utility of the WHO ICD-10-AM Pastoral Intervention Codings Within Religious, Pastoral and Spiritual Care Research. J. Relig. Health 2014, 54, 1772–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. The Guardian. Global Faith Leaders Call for Drug Firms to Vaccinate World against COVID. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/27/global-faith-leaders-call-for-drug-firms-to-vaccinate-world-against-covid (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  91. COVID-19 and Religious Minorities Pandemic Statement. United States Department of State. Available online: https://www.state.gov/covid-19-and-religious-minorities-pandemic-statement/ (accessed on 14 January 2021).
Table
Table 1. Main topics and related references resulting from the literature review.
Table 1. Main topics and related references resulting from the literature review.
TopicAuthor (First Name)YearType of Publication CountryMain Findings
COVID-19 outbreaks related to religious gatheringsEbrahim SH [19]2020Short communicationSaudi ArabiaUmrah pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia as a potential superspreading event.
Aschwanden C [20]2020Newspaper articleUnited StatesOutbreaks due to religious events reported in Georgia, Washington and Arkansas states (February–March 2020).
James A [21]2020National bulletin United StatesArkansas outbreak due to a religious event (March 2020): 38% of 92 attendees tested positive.
Additional 26 cases identified through contact tracing,
Memish ZA [22]2020Short communicationSaudi ArabiaReturning
Saudi pilgrims from Iran and Iraq as early
source of SARS-CoV-2 spread, contributing to
150,000 cases.
Ebrahim SH [23]2020Short communication Saudi ArabiaSuspension
of the Umrah pilgrimage to mitigate the COVID-19 spread risk.
Badshah SL [24]2020Short communication Pakistan60% of cases identified in Pakistan by 24 March 2020
were pilgrims who travelled to Iran.
Quadri SA [25]2020PerspectiveIran; Malaysia; Pakistan; India; Israel; South KoreaCOVID-19 outbreaks due to Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Jewish, Sikh religious gatherings
Wright R [26]2020Newspaper article IranFatima Masumeh pilgrimage in Qom as a source of COVID-19 spread in neighbouring countries
Pavli A [27]2020Short communication IsraelA cluster (48 cases) of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Christian Greek pilgrims returning from Israel
in late February 2020
Gu Y [28]2020EditorialChinaSix cases of SARS-CoV-2 positivity recorded
among the passengers of a flight from Pakistan (late March 2020). Cases had attended a
pilgrimage at a masjid in that country.
Che Mat NF [29]2020Short communicationMalaysia35% of new COVID-19 cases recorded in Malaysia in early April 2020 have been linked to the Muslim Sri Petaling gathering
Tan MM [30]2021Perspective MalaysiaDiverse COVID-19 outbreaks linked to religious gatherings
in Malaysia.
Najib M [31]2020Newspaper article IndiaAbout 40,000 people quarantined in Punjab following a coronavirus outbreak linked to a single Sikh priest.
Daim N [32]2020Newspaper article MalaysiaAbout 44% out of the 3483 COVID-19 cases reported in Malaysia in early April 2020 linked to the religious tabligh gathering in Sri Petaling.
Kumar P [33] 2020Newspaper article IndiaAbout 30% of all confirmed COVID-19 cases in India linked to the Tablighi Jamaat religious gathering in Delhi. More than 22,000 have been quarantined or isolated. The government has declared the event as the largest of 14 coronavirus hotspots across the country (April 2020).
Jaja IF [34]2020Correspondence South Africa80% of all infections in the Eastern Cape Province ascribed to burial ceremonies in Port St Johns, Port Elizabeth and Mthatha. Over 80% of cases reported in the Free State derived from a single religious event leading to the infection of over 80 persons and the further
tracing of 1600
(March–April 2020).
Zalcberg S [35]2021Original research (cross-sectional)IsraelSample: 25 participants (17 men, 8 women; age range 25–60 years old) from various Ashkenazi groups of ultra-Orthodox society who had tested positive for COVID-19 or had contact with a COVID-19 case.
Period: March-September 2020
Main results: Participants perceived as causes for the high COVID-19 infection rate amongst the ultra-Orthodox population: (1) population and housing density; (2) community way of life, including frequent and collective religious practices and (3) disobedience of the COVID-19 preventive measures.
Tandon L [36]2020Newspaper articleUnited KingdomThe International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON community) in London has reported at least 21 confirmed cases and 5 deaths among those who attended a funeral at the ISKON temple on 12 March 2020, weeks before Prime Minister Boris Johnson imposed a lockdown.
At least 1000 devotees had gathered for the funeral.
Il Messaggero [37]2020 Newspaper article ItalyAn outbreak in a Roma community in early May 2020 had been attributable to a funeral ceremony. 72 positive cases had been estimated
Difficulty to penetrate Closed Religious Communities Dalsheim J [38]2020Newspaper articleUnited StatesInternet access, television broadcasts and certain cellphone functions are generally limited in strictly observant ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities. This prevented some observants to be timely informed about the virus spreading in the early phases.
Stein RE [39]2021Original research (Retrospective study)United StatesPopulation: Amish and Mennonites community in Ohio
Methods: 2020 vs. 2015–2019 excess death calculation based on obituary information published in the major Amish/Mennonite newspaper.
Main results: Amish/Mennonite excess death rates globally similar to the national trends. Excess death rate spiked with a 125% increase in November 2020
when many governmental restrictions relaxed and many of the Amish and Mennonite groups were engaging in face-to-face interactions. According to authors, the importance of face-to-face rituals among CRCs indicates the spread of COVID-19 could be especially problematic within these groups, particularly for those that restrict technology.
COVID-19 unofficial treatments Iqbal Q [40]2020CorrespondencePakistanDrinking cow urine and hosting cow urine drinking parties in Hindu communities. Combining and consuming water and sacred soil found at the grave of Maronite monk Mar Charbel was reported among some Lebanese Christians.
Vaccine hesitancy Abouhala S [41]2022Original research (Cross-sectional study)United StatesSample: 638 Arab Americans
Period: May–September 2020
Main results: 56.7% reported the intention to be COVID-19 vaccinated; 35.7% reported uncertainty, and 7.5% reported being unlikely. Women had higher odds of being uncertain (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.57) or being unlikely to receive the vaccine (OR = 5.00; 95% CI: 1.95, 12.83) than men.
Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) staff [42]2021Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		United States Protestants (Black, Hispanic, white evangelical and “other Protestants of color”) and Mormons resulted to be the least vaccine-receptive religious groups (share of accepters equal/less than 50%) in March 2021. Increase in acceptance has been observed in June 2021.
Khan Y [43]2020Short communicationPakistanThreat of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Pakistan. Anti- COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy narratives often tied to religious beliefs and spread by political leaders
Galang JRF [44]2021Correspondence n.a.Anti-vaccine misinformation promoted by leaders of different religions. Homosexuality, control of the mind, conspiracy to “feed cow’s blood to Hindus”, manufacturing based on slaughtered fetuses, “mark of the devil” are some of the arguments used.
Seale H [45]2020Newspaper articleAustraliaReligious concerns over vaccine production methods and the importance to engage religious leaders to ensure they are equipped with accurate information about the potential COVID-19 vaccine, its development process and the rationale for its use.
Ali S [46]2021Correspondence n.a. COVID-19 vaccine concerns during Ramadan fasts.
Fuel of religious discriminationSarkar S [47]2020Feature India; Pakistan;
Cambodia; South Korea		COVID-19 as a pretence for religious discrimination.
United Nations Press Release Staff [48]2020Press releasen.a.Increase in conspiracy-driven anti-Semitic hate speech.
Role of religious communities and leaders in COVID-19 information
Modell SM [49]2020Philosophical exploration United States Spiritual and material support promoted by churches.
Weinberger-Litman SL [50]2020Original research United StatesSample: 308 Modern Orthodox Jewish
Results: Community organizations
trusted more than institutional and media sources in COVID-19-related information.
(Cross-sectional study)
Levin J [51]2020Commentary n.a.Individual clergy and congregations as sources of COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.
Galiatsatos P [52]2020Original research
(Case study)		United StatesTarget population: Faith community leaders, representatives from religious communities, senior centers, hospitals and other health care centers, community service organizations, and the local government.
Intervention: 12 Community conference calls to disseminate CO VID-19 information and provide mental support.
Period: March–April 2020
Main results: Advance care planning, telemedicine, social isolation, mental health, meditation and other coping strategies among the topics discussed. Information received has been shared throughout the community.
Additional community calls were requested with particular regard to mental health. Distribution of food and facemasks was also achieved at three congregations. The calls also served to identify and correct any potentially harmful misinformation circulating among the communities and to prepare religious leaders for the safe re-opening of religious services.
Ho KMA [53]2022Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		United KingdomSample: 1063 participants from different religious backgrounds.
Period: August–November: 2020
Sample: 939.
Main results: 939 respondents (80.7% self-identified as Christians), of whom 78% find it acceptable to wear a face mask during worship. 97.3% stated their place of worship complied with government guidelines and 90.5% stated that it enforced face mask-wearing.
Wiltse D [54]2021University press release (Cross-sectional and comparative cross-sectional study)United StatesSouth Dakota COVID-19 Impact Survey (SDSU Poll)
Population: 3057 registered voters in South Dakota
Period: 12–25 April 2021
Main results:
Among participants who had not received a vaccine, those spurred by a religious leader indicated nearly twice the likelihood of getting vaccinated than those invited by politicians or medical professionals.
Congregation for the Doctrine of The Faith [55]2020Congregation for the Doctrine of The Faithn.a.COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in research and production process are morally legitimate in case of a lack of alternatives. Pharmaceutical companies and government health agencies are asked to be committed to producing, approving, distributing ethically acceptable vaccines that do not create conscience concerns and are accessible also to the poorest countries.
Official Note
Lacsa JME [56]2022Correspondence n.a.Catholic Church supported government vaccination programmes by offering churches as vaccination sites. Moral acceptability of vaccines in line with the Official Note of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Vatican News [57]2021Newspaper articlen.a.Pope Francis urges people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 adding that “getting vaccinated is a simple yet profound way to care for one another, especially the most vulnerable”.
Mirza Asad [58]2021Newspaper articlen.a.Leaders of different religions (Islam, Orthodox Judaism) reassure about the religious acceptance of vaccine composition.
Role of religions in coping COVID-19 stress and promoting mental and physical well-beingDeSouza F [59]2021PerspectiveUnited StatesPhysical closure of churches
increased mental stress of the faithful. Black Churches promoted spiritual renewal alongside mental
resiliency and coping against societal racism, especially for
older African Americans.
Gecewicz C [60]2020Research Center ReportUnited StatesPew Research Center’s American Trends Panel survey
Sample: 10,139 US adults
Period: 20 to 26 April 2020
Main findings: One-quarter of U.S. adults overall (24%) say their faith has become stronger because of the coronavirus pandemic,
Bentzen JS [61]2021Original research (Observational study based on Google searches)n.a.During the early months of the pandemic, Google searches for prayer rose by 30%, reaching the highest level ever recorded. The rise was observed in all continents, at all levels of income, inequality, and insecurity, and for all types of religion, except Buddhism.
Ribeiro MRC [62]2020Correspondence Brazil; Spiritual Hotline Project aimed to offer free spiritual and religious assistance and to make a referral, if needed. Time frame: 29 May–14 June 2020
(including a case report) PortugalResults: 108 appointments requested and calls to the free telephone hotline made from 107 Brazilian states and 2 countries (Brazil and Portugal).
Del Castillo FA [63]2020Correspondence (including a case report)PhilippinesRoman Catholic Church initiatives in the Philippines:
online-based religious ceremonies; online counselling and pastoral guidance to increase coping;
personal protective
equipment provision; feeding support to the poor
Coppola I [64]2021Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		ItalySample: 1250 adults
Period: February–May 2020.
Main results:
Participants perceived lower levels of spiritual well-being and mental health than the pre-pandemic situation and women perceived lower mental health than men. Spirituality and religious practices as protective factors for physical and mental health. Family as a protective factor for mental health.
Pirutinsky S [65]2020Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		United StatesSample: n = 419 American Orthodox Jews
Period: March–April 2020
Main results: positive religious coping, intrinsic religiosity and trust in God strongly correlated with less stress and a more positive impact.
DeRossett T [66]2021Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		United StatesSample: 970 participants
Period: 12–25 September 2020.
Main Findings: negative religious coping positively associated with COVID-19 anxiety. Positive religious coping negatively, although weakly, associated with COVID-19 anxiety.
Thomas J [67]2020Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		United Arab EmiratesSample: 543 Muslim and Christian residents of the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Period: 6–17 April 2020
Main results:
Positive religious coping was inversely related to having a history of psychological disorders. Muslims reported significantly higher levels of positive religious coping compared to Christians.
Koenig HG [68]2020Commentaryn.a.Religion as a relevant resource for health and well-being in older adults. Geriatric psychiatrists can help religious elders make use of their faith to relieve anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rababa M [69]2020Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		JordanSample: 248 community-dwelling older adults (aged 60–75)
Period: Unspecified
Main results: The majority of participants were found to have low levels of religious coping and spiritual well-being and high levels of death anxiety. Females were found to have higher levels of religious coping and lower levels of death anxiety than men. Religious coping and spiritual well-being were found to be significant predictors of death anxiety in older adults.
Suresh M [70] 2020Original research
(Cross-sectional study)
United StatesSample: 310 homebound older adults
Period: May–July 2020
Main results:
The more positive religious coping individuals used, the less likely they were to fall into the high suicide risk category.
Chow SK [71]2021Original research
(Cross-sectional study)		MalaysiaSample: 200 HCWs
Period: unspecified
Main results: HCWs scored higher in positive religious coping than negative religious coping. Positive coping statistically significantly predicted a reduction in anxiety and log-transformed depression score.
Sen HE [72] 2022Original research (Longitudinal study)Canada; United States;
United Kingdom; Australia		Sample: 549 caregivers
Period: May–November 2020.
Main results: Religion and spiritual beliefs and practices were positively associated with coping and coping was inversely related to psychological distress.
Note: n.a.—not applicable; HCW—healthcare workers. References reported do not follow numerical order but are clustered for topics. Other topics that emerged were: concern regarding the possible role of fasting in influencing the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection [73,74,75]; how religious worship adapted to gathering restrictions (e.g., online ceremonies etc.) and how faithful perceived this shift [76,77,78,79].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sisti, L.G.; Buonsenso, D.; Moscato, U.; Costanzo, G.; Malorni, W. The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691

AMA Style

Sisti LG, Buonsenso D, Moscato U, Costanzo G, Malorni W. The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(3):1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sisti, Leuconoe Grazia, Danilo Buonsenso, Umberto Moscato, Gianfranco Costanzo, and Walter Malorni. 2023. "The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 3: 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691

APA Style

Sisti, L. G., Buonsenso, D., Moscato, U., Costanzo, G., & Malorni, W. (2023). The Role of Religions in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop