Tracing the sign národ in political thinking in post-totalitarian Slovakia

[1] Bugge, P. The Making of a Slovak City: The Czechoslovak Renaming of Pressburg/Pozsony/Presporok, 1918–19. Austrian History Yearbook 35, 205–227, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S006723780002099310.1017/S0067237800020993Search in Google Scholar

[2] Červenák, A. V práci a pokore prijímam republiku. Republika. 4 October 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dokumenty slovenskej národnej identity a štátnosti 1. Bratislava: Národné literárne centrum, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ďurica, M. S. Priblížíŧ sa k pravde. Reakcie na stanovisko Historického ústavu SAV k mojej knihe Dejiny Slovenska a Slovákov. Bratislava: Media Trade, 1998 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Goldfarb, G. C. Beyond Glasnost: The Post-Totalitarian Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hanus, M. Sólyom a Fico: ako u bláznov. Týždeň 16 March 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Eurobarometer 74: verejná mienka v Európskej únii. Jeseň 2010. Retrieved from Zhttp://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb74/eb74_sk_sk_nat.pdf on 5 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Haughton, T., Rybář, M. A Change of Direction: The 2006 Parliamentary Elections and Party Politics in Slovakia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 232–255, 2008. 10.1080/13523270802003053Search in Google Scholar

[9] Henderson, K. Experts or Novices? The Prospects for the New Slovak Government. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Henderson, K. Euroscepticism or Europhobia? Opposition Attitudes to the EU in Slovakia. SCI Working Paper 50, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Howarth, D., Stavrakakis, Y. Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. In D. Howarth, A.J. Norval, Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kenney, P. A Carnival of Revolution: Central Europe 1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002. 10.1515/9781400843879Search in Google Scholar

[13] Laclau, E. Power and Social Communication. Ethical Perspectives 7, 139–145, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/EP.7.2.50379910.2143/EP.7.2.503799Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lukáč, P. Historická a politická identita Slovenska na prahu jeho integrácie do EÚ. Slovenská otázka dnes: výber textov z časopisu OS 1997–2006. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Marušiak, J. Fenomén strany Smer: medzi „pragmatizmom“ a sociálnou demokraciou. Central European Political Studies Review 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Michaels, D. Revising the Nation Through Schooling: Citizenship and Belonging in Slovak Textbooks, 1918–2005. PhD thesis. University of Michigan. Retreived from http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64631/1/deborka_1.pdf on 5 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mináč, V. Tu žije národ. In V. Mináč. Vybrané spory. Bratislava: Národné literárne centrum, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Menzies, C. Statebuilding and the Phenomenon of Mečiarism. Unpublished PhD thesis. SEES University College London, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nabers, D. Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 5, 191–214, 2009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.x10.1111/j.1743-8594.2009.00089.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Nabers, D. Crisis, Hegemony and Change in the International System: A Conceptual Framework. GIGA Working Paper 50, 2007. 10.2139/ssrn.999332Search in Google Scholar

[21] Norval, A. J. Trajectories of Future Research in Discourse Theory. In D. Howarth, A.J. Norval, Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[22] O slovenské občianstvo prišlo 32 ľudí, najviac prijalo nemeckeé. Retrieved from http://www.sme.sk/c/5766454/o-slovenske-obcianstvo-prislo-32-ludi-najviac-prijalo-nemecke.html#ixzz1FBVw1otx on 27 March 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Podoksik, E. Anti-totalitarian Ambiguities: Jacob Talmon and Michael Oakeshott. History of European Ideas 34, 206–219, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2007.12.00910.1016/j.histeuroideas.2007.12.009Search in Google Scholar

[24] Pynsent, R. Tinkering with the Ferkos: A Kind of Slovakness. Slavonic and East European Review 2, 279–295, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Salner, P. Premeny Bratislavy, 1939–1993. Bratislava: SAV, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Skilling, G. H. Samizdat and an Independent Society in Eastern and Central Europe. Houndmills: MacMillan Press, 1989. 10.1007/978-1-349-09284-0Search in Google Scholar

[27] Slobodník, D. Hra o Slovensku. Bratislava: Juga, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Slobodník, D. Proti sedemhlavému drakovi. Z dejín zápasu za Slovensko. Bratislava: Spolok slovenských spisovateľov, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Solivajsová, Z. Zo slobody vôle občanov. Republika. 4 October 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Šrámek, Ľ. Publikum médií v roku1998. Otázky žurnalistiky, 1, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Torfing, J. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. Search in Google Scholar