Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:37:58.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Andreas Fricius Modrevius—A Polish Political Theorist of the Sixteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Extract

It has been said that political thought of the sixteenth century can be classified into two types—an attempt to find a juristic basis for the raison d'état exemplified in the work of Bodin, and the antithetic point of view found in the Vindiciae and concerned with the establishment of abstract right.

There is, however, yet another trend of political thought observable at the time—a political theory which combines the two trends of political thought mentioned above, but which goes beyond the “long research into the terms of political obedience,” in its attempt at a synthetic view of the state and society. And one of the best expressions of this way of thinking is found in the writings of Andreas Fricius Modrevius (Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski), the most notable political author of sixteenth-century Poland.

The great significance of Fricius' writings to a modern student lies largely in the way in which they mirror the thought of the Renaissance and the Reformation, and in the successful combination that Fricius achieves of a predominantly Aristotelian analysis of the state with a Christian idealism which he imparts to his discussion of a “good state” and its ends. His ability to combine the best features of the ancient political thought and to adapt them to the realities of sixteenth-century Europe brought Fricius to the attention of such writers as Bodin, Althusius, and Grotius.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E.g., by Laski, in his introduction to the Vindiciae contra Tyrannos, p. 45.Google Scholar

2 Laski, op. cit., p. 4.

3 Kot, , Rzeczypospolita w Literaturze Politycznej Zachodu, p. 33.Google Scholar

4 Kot, op. cit., pp. 62–66.

5 Kolankowski, , Zygmunt August, p. 53.Google Scholar

6 Quoted by Kot, , Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, p. 177.Google Scholar

7 Kot, op. cit., pp. 53–57.

8 Kot, op. cit., p. 75. All references to Kot, unless otherwise specified, are to Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski.

9 Quoted in Kot, op. cit., p. 97.

10 Quoted in ibid., pp. 134–135.

11 Kot, op. cit., p. 165.

12 Modrzewski, Andrzej Frycz, O Naprawie Rzeczpospolitej Z Przektadu Cyprjana Bazylika, p. 1.Google Scholar

13 Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, op. cit., pp. 22–23.

14 Ibid., p. 67.

15 Quoted in Moreau-Reibel, Jean, Jean Bodin et le Droit Public, p. 235.Google Scholar

16 Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, op. cit., p. 87.

17 Ibid., pp. 86–87.

18 Ibid., p. 109.

19 Ibid., p. 130.

20 Kot, , Rzeczypospolita Polska w Literaturze Zachodu, p. 66.Google Scholar

21 Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, op. cit., p. 52.

22 Ibid., p. 41.

23 Ibid., pp. 121 and 130.

24 Kot, , The Polish State and Political Literature of the West, p. 47.Google Scholar

25 Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski, op. cit., p. 96.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.