iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.11.4.0428
Market Socialism in Belarus: An Alternative to China's Socialist Market Economy – ScienceOpen
4,990
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Market Socialism in Belarus: An Alternative to China's Socialist Market Economy

      Published
      research-article
      ,
      World Review of Political Economy
      Pluto Journals
      Belarus, market socialism, Lukashenko, socialist market economic system
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Since Lukashenko came to power, Belarus has embarked on the road of market socialism, in which privatization has been halted, and the dominant position of state-owned economic components in the national economy has been established; a vertically managed and efficient model of state governance has been implemented, the presidential leadership has been strengthened, and social fairness and justice have been prioritized. In addition, Belarus has kept good diplomatic relations with the CIS (Commonwealth of Independence States) countries, China, and other countries through pluralistic and multi-directional diplomacy. Market socialism has helped the economy of Belarus recover from the decline immediately following the breakup of the USSR and develop rapidly. The country's economic foundation has been getting increasingly stable. A strong social security system has been established, and social welfare covers the largest social groups, which ensures employment and civil rights to the greatest extent, continuously improves the living standards of the population, and thus avoids social division and ensures social stability. Market socialism in Belarus is a special system of socialist market economy, its theory and practice can teach important lessons to the current practice of socialism and the reform of capitalist system

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50005553
            worlrevipoliecon
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042-891X
            2042-8928
            1 December 2020
            : 11
            : 4 ( doiID: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.11.issue-4 )
            : 428-454
            Article
            worlrevipoliecon.11.4.0428
            10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.11.4.0428
            6a9e1d5b-721d-4b6d-8758-ebae5258d5d6
            © 2020 World Association for Political Economy

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Political economics
            Lukashenko,market socialism,Belarus,socialist market economic system

            References

            1. Armor, A. 2016. “Belarusian ‘Market Socialism': What's Next?” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2119932.html.

            2. Bogdan, N. I., and T. V. Bukhovets. 2015. “Theory and Practice of Privatization.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://rep.bntu.by/bitstream/handle/data/35866/Gosudarstvo_i_sobstvennost_v_Respublike_Belarus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

            3. Bykov, A. 2014. “Features of the Formation and Implementation of the Model of Neo-Industrial Development of the Economy of the Republic of Belarus.” [In Russian.] Sociology, no. 2: 58–68.

            4. Cheng, E., and Y. Sun. 2015. “Israeli Kibbutz: A Successful Example of Collective Economy.” World Review of Political Economy 6 (2): 160–175.

            5. Dzhgarkava, N. 2020. “Insurance for Lukashenko: Why in Belarus the Government Changed.” [In Russian.] Gazeta, April 6.

            6. Fang, R., and S. Li. 2013. “State Guidance and Social Participation: Patriotism Education in Belarus.” [In Chinese.] Academic Exchange, no. 4: 47–53.

            7. Han, L. 2018. “The Current Situation and Prospect of Economic Development in Belarus.” [In Chinese.] Eurasian Economy, no. 3: 111–128.

            8. Huang, Z. 2011. “‘Market Socialism' Brings Belarus Back to Life: Report on the Study Visit of Training Program for Chinese University Presidents to Belarus.” [In Chinese.] Studies on Marxism, no. 4: 124–128.

            9. IA REX. 2016. “Belarus: Social Crisis in the Country of ‘Market Socialism.'” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://iarex.ru/articles/52365.html.

            10. Khabarov, A. 2020. “Lukashenko Started a Dangerous Game with Russia before the Election.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5e501d684ce04c746cbf1d39/lukashenko-pered-vyborami-zateial-opasnuiu-igru-s-rossiei-5ecbe80a9a3f742070eebaea.

            11. Kovalenia, A. A. 2016. A Brief History of Belarus. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Social Science Academic Press.

            12. Liu, X., and X. Wang. 2019. “Ownership Structure Reform and Recent Trends in Russia.” [In Chinese.] Shanghai School of Economics, no. 4: 156–173.

            13. Lukashenko, A. G. 2006. “Transcript of the Press Conference of President A. G. Lukashenko for Representatives of the Russian Regional Media.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://www.sb.by/docs/a-g-lukashenko-dlya-predstaviteley-rossiyskikh-regionalnykh-smi.html.

            14. Lukashenko, A. G. 2014. There Is Nothing More Important than the Truth. [In Russian.] Moscow: Samoteka.

            15. Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Belarus. 2016. “Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus February 23, 2016 N 149: On the State Program ‘Small and Medium-Sized Business in the Republic of Belarus' for 2016–2020.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. http://www.economy.gov.by/uploads/files/fin-msp/Postanovlenie-ot-23.02.2016-149.pdf.

            16. National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus. 2016. “Express Bulletin of Legislation of the Republic of Belarus for the Period from December 31, 2015 to January 13, 2016.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. http://www.pravo.by/pravovaya-informatsiya/normativnye-dokumenty/ekspress-byulleten/zakonodatelstvo-respubliki-belarus/2016january/20492/.

            17. NAVINI.BY. 2017. “Updated Decree No. 3: The State Forms a Database of ‘Parasites.'” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://yandex.by/turbo/s/naviny.by/article/20171221/1513863576-obnovlennyy-dekret-no-3-gosudarstvo-formiruet-bazu-dannyh-o-tuneyadcah.

            18. OUR OPINION. 2005. “The Expert Community of Belarus: Belarusian Economic Model.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://nmnby.eu/news/analytics/2433.html.

            19. Pravda. 2020. “Lukashenko Instructed the New Government for Russia.” [In Russian.] Pravda, April 6.

            20. Satsyuk, S. 2016. “Tell the Truth Campaign Decides to Become a Party.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2F%2Fnaviny.by%2Fnew%2F20200429%2F1588159639-kanopackaya-napisala-na-glavu-minzdrava-zayavlenie-v-genprokuraturu.

            21. Sessiya, Z. 2002. “Model of Socio-Economic Development of the Republic of Belarus as a Component of the Ideology of the Belarusian State.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://zavtrasessiya.com/index.pl?act=PRODUCT&id=252.

            22. Slon Magazine. 2015. “‘The Reserve of Socialism': What Is Wrong with the Economy of Belarus?” [In Russian.] https://republic.ru/posts/61627.

            23. Stepushova, L. 2020. “Zharikhin: Lukashenko Chooses between US Sanctions and Their ‘Ay-Ay-Ay.'” [In Russian.] Pravda, May 18.

            24. Stern, D. 2010. “Will Belarussian ‘Communism-Light' Hold On?” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://inosmi.ru/belorussia/20100110/157463153.html.

            25. Su, L. 2006. “Theory and Practice of Market Socialist Reforms in Belarus.” [In Chinese.] Foreign Theoretical Trends, no. 9: 12–14.

            26. Su, L. 2007. “Analysis of the Transformation Mode of Market Socialism in Belarus.” [In Chinese.] Macroeconomic Research, no. 12: 55–59.

            27. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2019. Human Development Report 2019. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf.

            28. Vasiliev, A. 2019. “‘Socialist Miracle': How Does Belarus Live Today?” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://bankstoday.net/last-articles/sotsialisticheskoe-chudo-kak-segodnya-zhivet-belorussiya.

            29. Vershinin, A. A., eds. 2016. Is “Belarusian Maidan” Possible? Diagnostics and Challenges for Russia. [In Russian.] Moscow: Scientific Expert.

            30. Xinhuanet. 2019. “The Enumeration of Two Sessions ‘56789,' Private Economy Holds ‘Weight.'” [In Chinese.] Xinhuanet, March 10. Accessed May 23, 2020. http://www.xinhuanet.com/comments/2019-03/09/c_1124214167.htm?utm_source=UfqiNews.

            31. Yurchenko, N. 2020. “Chinese Greetings: Why Does Lukashenko Measure the Distance to Moscow with Missiles.” [In Russian.] Accessed May 23, 2020. https://life.ru/p/1325887.

            32. Zhan, W. 2006. “Belarus ‘Adheres to the Direction of Socialist Reform.'” [In Chinese.] Studies on Marxism, no. 9: 102–104.

            Comments

            Comment on this article