Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and language evolution research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths-2014-002Keywords
Evolutionary Linguistics, Language Evolution, Complex Adaptive System, Interdisciplinary Integration, Cognition, Cognitive LinguisticsAbstract
In this paper we argue that we can gain important insights on the evolution of language and cognition by integrating evolutionary linguistics and the framework of Cognitive Linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics, language is seen as tightly integrated with cognition as a whole. Construction Grammar and usage-based approaches are closely related to the Cognitive-Linguistic paradigm. Construction Grammar proposes that knowledge of language can be defined as the knowledge of form-meaning pairings of different degrees of schematicity and complexity, whereas usage-based approaches stress that language acquisition and processing are based on instances of actual language usage. As we demonstrate in this paper, concepts from Cognitive Linguistics, construction grammar, and usage-based approaches can help in elucidating the cognitive and interactional factors involved in language evolution. The paper will focus on two main areas: In evolutionary linguistics, language is seen as a complex adaptive system whose structure emerges out of the interaction of three other complex adaptive systems at three different timescales: ontogeny, glossogeny, and phylogeny. Cognitive Linguistics can help in specifying common cognitive factors and processes that play a role on all three of these timescales. Secondly, a Cognitive-Linguistic and constructionist, usage-based perspective can shed light on the cognitive factors underlying the origin of the division of labour between contentful (“lexical”) and procedural (“grammatical”) constructions in language structure. In a Cognitive-Linguistic perspective, this development can be related to the trade-off between the cognitive factors of learnability and expressivity.
References
Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M., and Tomasello, M. (1996). The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development 67: 635-645.
Arbib, M. (2012). How the Brain got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baldwin, D.A. (1993). Infants’ ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language 20: 395-418.
Barlow, M., and Kemmer, S. (eds.). (2000). Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R.A., Bybee, J.L., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., and Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Language Learning 59 (s1): 1-26.
Bleys, J., and Steels, L. (2009). Linguistic selection of language strategies: a case study for colour. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life, LNCS. Berlin: Springer.
Blumenthal-Dramé, A. (2012). Entrenchment in Usage-based Theories: what Corpus Data do and do not Reveal about the Mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boye, K., and Harder, P. (2012). A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88: 1-44.
Bratman, M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 101: 327-341.
Brighton, H., Kirby, S., and Smith, K. (2005). Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In M. Tallerman (Ed.), Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution (pp. 291-309). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2012). Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In M. Tallerman and K. R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 528-536). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cann, R. (2001). Functional versus lexical: A cognitive dichotomy. In R. D. Borsley (Ed.). The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories (pp. 37-78). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Christiansen, M. H., and Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 489-509.
Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition 64: 1-37.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining Language Change: an Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, England; New York: Longman.
Croft, W., and Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton.
Deacon, T.W. (2010). Emergence: The Hole at the Wheel’s Hub. In P. Clayton and P. Davies (eds.). The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion (pp. 111-150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diessel, H. (2012). Language Change and Language Acquisition. In A. Bergs and L. Brinton (eds.). Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook (pp. 1599-1613). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diessel, H. (2013). Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 347-364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edelman, G. and Gally, J. (2001). Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (24): 13763-13768.
Ellis, N. (2013). Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. In T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365-387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, N., and Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429-448.
Evans, V., and Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: an Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (2004). Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 657-674). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Flom, R., and Johnson, S. (2011). The effects of adults’ affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds’ visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29: 64-85.
Geeraerts, D. (2006). Introduction: A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 1-28). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D., and Cuyckens, H. (2007). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Gentner, D., and Christie, S. (2010). Mutual bootstrapping between language and analogical processing. Language and Cognition 2(2): 261-283.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. (2014). The information structure of ditransitives: Informing scope properties and long-distance dependency constraints. In S. K. Bourns and L. L. Myers. (eds.). Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context: Studies in Honor of Knud Lambrecht (pp. 3-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde and H. Perridon (eds.). Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization (pp. 17-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, B., and Kuteva, T. (2007). The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, M. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, N. Himmelmann and B. Wiemer (eds.). What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components (pp. 21-42). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hoffmann, T., and Trousdale, G. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hruschka, D.J., Christiansen, M.H., Blythe, R.A., Croft, W., Heggarty, P., Mufwene, S.S., Pierrehumbert, J.B., and Poplack, S. (2009). Building social cognitive models of language change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (11): 464-469.
Hurford, J. R. (2012). The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ibbotson, P. (2011). Abstracting grammar from social-cognitive foundations: A developmental sketch of learning. Review of General Psychology 15(4): 331-343.
Irvine, L., Roberts, S., and Kirby, S. (2013). A robustness approach to theory building: A case study of language evolution. In M. P. M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, and I. Wachsmuth (Ed). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) (pp. 2614-2619). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Joseph, B. D. (2001). Is there such a thing as ‘grammaticalization’? Language Sciences 23: 163-186.
Kiparsky, P. (2012). Grammaticalization as optimization. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman and A. Garrett (eds.). Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes (pp. 15-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, Selection and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S. (2012). Language is an adaptive system: The role of cultural evolution in the origins of structure. In M. Tallerman and K. R. Gibson (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (pp. 589-604). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S. (2013). The evolution of linguistic replicators. In K. Smith and P.-M. Binder (eds.). The Language Phenomenon: Human Communication from Milliseconds to Millennia (pp. 121-138). London: Springer.
Kirby, S., and Hurford, J.R. (2002). The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An overview of the Iterated Learning Model. In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi (eds.). Simulating the Evolution of Language (pp. 121-148). London: Springer.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.). Usage-based Models of Language (pp. 24-63). Stanford: CSLI.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford [et al.]: Oxford University Press.
Lass, R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, C. (2004). Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152-187.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120: 2546-2556.
Miklósi, Á., and Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition 9: 81-93.
Moll, H., and Tomasello, M. (2007). Co-operation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 362: 639-648.
Mufwene, S. S. (2001). The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., and Gibson, E. (2012). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122: 280-291.
Pleyer, M. (2012). Cognitive construal, mental spaces and the evolution of language and cognition. In T. C. Scott-Phillips, M. Tamariz, E. A. Cartmill and J. R. Hurford (eds.). The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 288-295.). Singapore: World Scientific.
Pleyer, M. (2014). Perspectival construal patterns in language, cognition and interaction: Their acquisition, structure and foundations. In P. Rodríguez-Puente, T. Fanego, E. Gandón-Chapela, S. M. Riveiro-Outeiral and M. L. Roca-Varela (eds.). Current Research in Applied Linguistics: Issues on Language and Cognition (pp. 236-262). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Pleyer, M., and Lindner, N. (2014). Constructions, construal and cooperation in the evolution of language. In E. A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn and H. Cornish (eds.). The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 244-251). Singapore: World Scientific.
Romberg, A. R., and Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(6): 906-914.
Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make it Special.
Scott-Phillips, T. C., and Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(9): 411-417.
Sinha, C. (2009). Language as a biocultural niche and social institution. In V. Evans and S. Pourcel (eds.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 289-310). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Smith, A.D.M., and Höfler, S. (2014). The pivotal role of metaphor in the evolution of human language. In J.E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.). Metaphor and Metonomy across Time and Cultures: Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language (pp.123-140). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Smith, K., Tamariz, M., and Kirby, S. (2013). Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity. In M. P. M. Knauff, N. Sebanz, and I. Wachsmuth (eds.). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013) (pp. 1348-1353). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Steels, L. (2000). Language as a complex adaptive system. In M. Schoenauer (Ed.). Proceedings of PPSN VI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 17–26). Berlin: Springer.
Steels, L. (2004). Constructivist development of grounded Construction Grammars. In D. Scott, W. Daelemans and M. Walker (eds.). Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 9-16). Barcelona: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Steels, L. (2011). Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Review 8: 339-356.
Steels, L. (2012). Self-organization and selection in cultural language evolution. In L. Steels (Ed.), Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution (pp. 1-37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tallerman, M. (2009). The origins of the lexicon: how a word store evolved. In R. P. Botha and C. Knight (eds.). The Cradle of Language (pp. 181–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, J. R. (2012). The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terkourafi, M. (2011). The pragmatic variable: Toward a procedural interpretation. Language in Society 40: 343-372.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA; London, England: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A usage-based theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA; London, England: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and first language acquisition. In: D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1092-1112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA; London, England: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (2011). Language development. In U. Goswami (Ed.). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 239-257). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., and Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12-and 18-month-olds know what’s new for other persons. Developmental Psychology 39: 906-912.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, M., Behne, T. and Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675-691.
Traugott, E. C., and Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitacre, J. and Bender, A. (2010). Degeneracy: A design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. Journal of Theoretical Biology 263: 143-153.
Winters, J., Kirby, S., and Smith, K. (2014). Languages adapt to their contextual niche. Language and Cognition. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.35.
Winters, M. E., Tissari, H., and Allan, K. (2010).
Historical Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 4172
Number of citations: 0
