iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.

Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2699489

Modelling strategy with ArchiMate | Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

research-article

Modelling strategy with ArchiMate

Authors:

Maria-Eugenia Iacob,

Jos van Hillegersberg,

Lianne Bodenstaff,

Henry FrankenAuthors Info & Claims

SAC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Pages 1211 - 1218

https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2699489

Published: 13 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the ArchiMate modelling language can be used to model the most commonly used strategy models and concepts. This can be considered as an important step into closing the gap between Business and IT. By having a better understanding of what is needed to model strategy, we can analyse if the current version of the ArchiMate modelling language is sufficient or what additions need to be made. Also by knowing how the strategic concepts are used in the context of business we hope to improve the way they are modelled with ArchiMate. In order to do this, we start by taking a look at the strategic planning process and identify its main concepts. It starts by presenting the strategic planning process and its corresponding concepts and strategy models. This is followed by an analysis of the suitability of ArchiMate in which we argue that resource and capability concepts are concepts that should be included in the next versions of the language. Lastly, we demonstrate how strategy can be modelled with the help of a case study.

References

[1]

J. Schelp and M. Stutz, "A balanced scorecard approach to measure the value of enterprise architecture," Journal of Enterprise Architecture, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 8--14, 2007.

[2]

J. Schekkerman, "Enterprise Architecture Scorecard, Version 2.1," 2004. {Online}. Available: http://www.enterprise-architecture.info

[3]

W. Engelsman, H. Jonkers and D. Quartel, ArchiMate® Extension for Modeling and Managing Motivation, Principles, and Requirements in TOGAF®, White Paper: The Open Group, 2011.

[4]

M. E. Iacob, L. O. Meertens, H. Jonkers, D. A. C. Quartel, L. J. M. Nieuwenhuis and M. J. Van Sinderen, "From enterprise architecture to business models and back," Software & Systems Modeling, pp. 1--25, 2012.

Digital Library

[5]

B. Fritscher and Y. Pigneur, "Business IT alignment from business model to enterprise architecture," in Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability, 2011.

[6]

M. E. Iacob, D. Quartel and H. Jonkers, "Capturing business strategy and value in enterprise architecture to support portfolio valuation," in Proceedings of the 16th International EDOC Conference, Beijing, China, 2012.

Digital Library

[7]

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger and S. Chatterjee, "A design science research methodology for information systems research," Journal of management information systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45--77, 2007.

Digital Library

[8]

C. W. Hill and G. R. Jones, Strategic management: an integrated approach, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.

[9]

J. D. Hunger and T. L. Wheelen, Essentials of strategic management, Boston: Cengage, 2003.

[10]

C. D. Scott, D. T. Jaffe and G. R. Tobe, Organisational vision, values and mission, Menlo Park: Crisp Publications, 1993.

Digital Library

[11]

Object Management Group, "BMM 1.1," 2010. {Online}. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.1/.

[12]

A. Campbell and S. Yeung, "Brief case: mission, vision and strategic intent," Long Range Planning, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 145--147, 1991.

[13]

H. Mintzberg, The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases, Pearson Education, 2003.

[14]

J. Barney, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage," Journal of Management, pp. 99--120, 1991.

[15]

D. Teece and G. Pisano, "The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction," Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 3, pp. 537--556, 1994.

[16]

I. Britton and C. Worthington, The business environment, Harlow: Financial Times / Pearson Education, 2006.

[17]

M. Porter, Competitive strategy: techniques for analysing industries and competitors, New York: Free Press, 1980.

[18]

H. Weihrich, "The TOWS matrix - a tool for situational analysis," Long Range Planning, vol. 15, 2, 54--66, 1982.

[19]

G. Johnson, K. Scholes and R. Whittington, Exploring corporate strategy: text & cases, Pearson, 2008.

Digital Library

[20]

R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, "Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system," Harvard business review, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 75--85, 1996.

[21]

M. E. Iacob, H. Jonkers, M. Lankhorst, E. Proper and D. A. C. Quartel, ArchiMate 2.0, Van Haren, 2012.

[22]

C. L.B. Azevedo, M. E. Iacob, J. P. A. Almeida, M. van Sinderen, L. F. Pires and G. Guizzardi, "An ontology-based well-founded proposal for modeling resources and capabilities in ArchiMate," in IEEE EDOC 2013.

Digital Library

[23]

J. Logan, Mission, vision, values, TheCanadian Assoc., 2004

[24]

R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, "The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance," Harvard Business Review, Vols. January-February, pp. 71--79, 1992.

[25]

A. Aldea, M. E. Iacob, D. Quartel and H. Franken, "Strategic planning and enterprise architecture," Enterprise Systems Conference (ES), pp. 1--8. IEEE, 2013.

[26]

Object Management Group. Business Motivation Model. Version 1.2, http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.2/.

[27]

D. Quartel, W. Engelsman, H. Jonkers, and M. Van Sinderen, "A goal-oriented requirements modelling language for enterprise architecture," in. IEEE EDOC'09. 2009, 3--13.

Digital Library

[28]

R. van Buuren, H. Jonkers, M.-E. Iacob, and P. Strating, "Composition of relations in enterprise architecture models," in Graph Transformations, ed: Springer, 2004, pp. 39--53.

Cited By

Fuentes-Quijada GRuiz-González FCaro A(2024)Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance to Support the BizDevOps Approach: a Systematic Mapping StudyInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2
Kitsios FKyriakopoulou MKamariotou M(2022)Exploring Business Strategy Modelling with ArchiMate: A Case Study ApproachInformation10.3390/info1301003113:1(31)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010031
Daoudi WDoumi KKjiri L(2022)Adaptive Enterprise Architecture: Complexity Metrics in a Mixed Evaluation MethodEnterprise Information Systems10.1007/978-3-031-08965-7_26(505-523)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08965-7_26
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Modelling strategy with ArchiMate
1. Applied computing
  1. Enterprise computing
    1. Business process management
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Modeling and simulation
    1. Model development and analysis
      1. Model verification and validation

Recommendations

Experience on Using ArchiMate Models for Modelling Blockchain-Enhanced Value Chains
EASE '22: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering

Blockchain is an emerging disruptive technology with a great potential to impact business value creation. Yet it is challenging to understand how blockchain can be utilised to improve enterprises’ performance and value creation. A formalised conceptual ...
Mapping the business model canvas to ArchiMate
SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Many IT projects fail to succeed in the market, as they start purely from technology. Much effort is therefore wasted, while the potential benefits are not realized. We argue that the design process should start with creating a business model, which is ...
Bridging value modelling to ArchiMate via transaction modelling

The ArchiMate modelling language provides a coherent and a holistic view of an enterprise in terms of its products, services, business processes, actors, business units, software applications and more. Yet, ArchiMate currently lacks (1) expressivity in ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SAC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

April 2015

2418 pages

ISBN:9781450331968

DOI:10.1145/2695664

Conference Chairs:
Roger L. Wainwright
University of Tulsa
,
Juan Manuel Corchado
University of Salamanca, Spain
,
Program Chairs:
Alessio Bechini
University of Pisa, Italy
,
Jiman Hong
Soongsil University, South Korea

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SAC 2015

Sponsor:

SIGAPP

SAC 2015: Symposium on Applied Computing

April 13 - 17, 2015

Salamanca, Spain

Acceptance Rates

SAC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 291 of 1,211 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

12
Total Citations
View Citations
661
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)81
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 03 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Fuentes-Quijada GRuiz-González FCaro A(2024)Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance to Support the BizDevOps Approach: a Systematic Mapping StudyInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2Online publication date: 21-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2
Kitsios FKyriakopoulou MKamariotou M(2022)Exploring Business Strategy Modelling with ArchiMate: A Case Study ApproachInformation10.3390/info1301003113:1(31)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010031
Daoudi WDoumi KKjiri L(2022)Adaptive Enterprise Architecture: Complexity Metrics in a Mixed Evaluation MethodEnterprise Information Systems10.1007/978-3-031-08965-7_26(505-523)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08965-7_26
Bandeira CBarata JRoque N(2022)Architecting Digital Twin-Driven Transformation in the Refrigeration and Air Conditioning SectorDigital Transformation in Industry10.1007/978-3-030-94617-3_2(13-28)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94617-3_2
Bemthuis RIacob MHavinga P(2020)A Design of the Resilient Enterprise: A Reference Architecture for Emergent Behaviors ControlSensors10.3390/s2022667220:22(6672)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2020
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226672
Natvig MJiang SHallsteinsen S(2020)Stakeholder Motivation Analysis for Smart and Green Charging for Electric MobilityWeb, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_127(1394-1407)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_127
Küppers PRöckle HDorrhauer C(2019)Der Weg zur Digitalstrategie am Beispiel der Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft in Ludwigshafen am RheinHochschulen in Zeiten der Digitalisierung10.1007/978-3-658-26618-9_10(155-169)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26618-9_10
Aldea AIacob MQuartel D(2018)From Business Strategy to Enterprise Architecture and Back2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)10.1109/EDOCW.2018.00029(145-152)Online publication date: Oct-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2018.00029
Aldea AIacob MWombacher AHiralal MFranck T(2018)Enterprise Architecture 4.0 – A Vision, an Approach and Software Tool Support2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)10.1109/EDOC.2018.00011(1-10)Online publication date: Oct-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00011
Aldea AKusumaningrum MIacob MDaneva M(2018)Modeling and Analyzing Digital Business Ecosystems: An Approach and Evaluation2018 IEEE 20th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)10.1109/CBI.2018.10064(156-163)Online publication date: Jul-2018
https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2018.10064
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents