iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0
Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau | Nature Climate Change
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau

Nature Climate Change volume 12, pages 801–807 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Terrestrial water storage (TWS) over the Tibetan Plateau, a major global water tower, is crucial in determining water transport and availability to a large downstream Asian population. Climate change impacts on historical and future TWS changes, however, are not well quantified. Here we used bottom-up and top-down approaches to quantify a significant TWS decrease (10.2 Gt yr–1) over the Tibetan Plateau in recent decades (2002–2017), reflecting competing effects of glacier retreat, lake expansion and subsurface water loss. Despite the weakened trends in projected TWS, it shows large declines under a mid-range carbon emissions scenario by the mid-twenty-first century. Excess water-loss projections for the Amu Darya and Indus basins present a critical water resource threat, indicating declines of 119% and 79% in water-supply capacity, respectively. Our study highlights these two hotspots as being at risk from climate change, informing adaptation strategies for these highly vulnerable regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Lakes, glaciers and major river basins on the TP.
Fig. 2: Component contributions and agreement in water-storage changes.
Fig. 3: Reconstructed and projected changes in water storage and climate drivers.
Fig. 4: Projected changes in water demand and supply capacity in key Asian basins.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Shapefiles of hydrologic basin boundaries63 used in this study are provided at http://data.tpdc.ac.cn. GRACE and GRACE-FO data are provided by the NASA MEaSUREs Program, where SH and JPL-M data can be accessed at https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/; and the CSR-M data can be accessed at http://www2.csr.utexas.edu/grace. The elevation-change maps over the glacierized areas64 are provided at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.876545, and RGI 6.0 glacier mask can be accessed at http://www.glims.org/RGI/. Datasets of lake storage changes46,65 are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5543615 and https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.898411. Data from GLDAS land surface models and IMERG precipitation can be accessed at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/. ERA5 reanalysis data are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/. GLEAM ET data are available at https://www.gleam.eu/. Data from CMIP6 models can be found at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/. Irrigation water demand is derived from the LPJml model provided by the ISIMIP portal (https://www.isimip.org/outputdata/). Industrial and domestic water demand is available on request from Y. Wada (wada@iiasa.ac.at). Monsoon monitor results for generating Supplementary Fig. 8 are derived at http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/projects/monsoon/. Model-simulated TWS for generating Supplementary Fig. 10 is available at https://www.isimip.org/outputdata/. Reservoir information for generating Supplementary Fig. 18 can be accessed at https://globaldamwatch.org. Data for generating Supplementary Figs. 1, 6 and 11 are accessible on request from Y. Pokhrel (ypokhrel@egr.msu.edu), G. Zheng (zhengguanheng163@163.com) and Z. Sun (sunzhangli@gmail.com), respectively. Projected TWS changes by the mid-twenty-first century, generated by this study66, are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6784501.

Code availability

All analysis was performed using functions in MATLAB. The key portions of the computer code used to process the results and develop the figures67 are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6784641.

References

  1. Yao, T. et al. The imbalance of the Asian water tower. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00299-4 (2022).

  2. Yao, T. et al. Different glacier status with atmospheric circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 663–667 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moelg, T., Maussion, F. & Scherer, D. Mid-latitude westerlies as a driver of glacier variability in monsoonal High Asia. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 68–73 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tapley, B. D. et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 358–369 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Bierkens, M. F. P., Lutz, A. F. & Immerzeel, W. W. Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia’s glaciers. Nature 549, 257–260 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Houborg, R., Rodell, M., Li, B., Reichle, R. & Zaitchik, B. F. Drought indicators based on model-assimilated Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage observations. Water Resour. Res. 48, W07525 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Long, D. et al. GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3395–3401 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Long, D. et al. Drought and flood monitoring for a large karst plateau in Southwest China using extended GRACE data. Remote Sens. Environ. 155, 145–160 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reager, J. T., Thomas, B. F. & Famiglietti, J. S. River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time. Nat. Geosci. 7, 589–593. (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pokhrel, Y. N. et al. Model estimates of sea-level change due to anthropogenic impacts on terrestrial water storage. Nat. Geosci. 5, 389–392 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacob, T., Wahr, J., Pfeffer, W. T. & Swenson, S. Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature 482, 514–518 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Immerzeel, W. W. et al. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature 577, 364–369 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1080–E1089 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pokhrel, Y. N. et al. Incorporation of groundwater pumping in a global land surface model with the representation of human impacts. Water Resour. Res. 51, 78–96 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pokhrel, Y. et al. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 226–233 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kaab, A. & Treichler, D. A spatially resolved estimate of High Mountain Asia glacier mass balances from 2000 to 2016. Nat. Geosci. 10, 668–673 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, F., Long, D., Li, X., Huang, Q. & Han, P. Rapid glacier mass loss in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau since the year 2000 from satellite observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112853 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farinotti, D., Immerzeel, W. W., de Kok, R. J., Quincey, D. J. & Dehecq, A. Manifestations and mechanisms of the Karakoram glacier anomaly. Nat. Geosci. 13, 8–16 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Forsythe, N., Fowler, H. J., Li, X.-F., Blenkinsop, S. & Pritchard, D. Karakoram temperature and glacial melt driven by regional atmospheric circulation variability. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 664–670 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, G. et al. Lake volume and groundwater storage variations in Tibetan Plateau’s endorheic basin. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5550–5560 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, X. et al. High-temporal-resolution water level and storage change data sets for lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2000–2017 using multiple altimetric missions and Landsat-derived lake shoreline positions. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1603–1627 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, T. et al. Permafrost thawing puts the frozen carbon at risk over the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz3513 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng, G. et al. Remote sensing spatiotemporal patterns of frozen soil and the environmental controls over the Tibetan Plateau during 2002–2016. Remote Sens. Environ. 247, 111927 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557, 651–659 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J. C., Thompson, P. F. & Watkins, M. M. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305, 503–505 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jing, W., Zhang, P. & Zhao, X. A comparison of different GRACE solutions in terrestrial water storage trend estimation over Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Rep. 9, 1765 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Viviroli, D., Kummu, M., Meybeck, M., Kallio, M. & Wada, Y. Increasing dependence of lowland populations on mountain water resources. Nat. Sustain. 3, 917–928 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, G., Yao, T., Xie, H., Kang, S. & Lei, Y. Increased mass over the Tibetan Plateau: from lakes or glaciers? Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2125–2130 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Biemans, H. et al. Importance of snow and glacier meltwater for agriculture on the Indo–Gangetic Plain. Nat. Sustain. 2, 594–601 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lutz, A. F. et al. South Asian agriculture increasingly dependent on meltwater and groundwater. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 566–573 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao, J., Yao, T., Masson-Delmotte, V., Steen-Larsen, H. C. & Wang, W. Collapsing glaciers threaten Asia’s water supplies. Nature 565, 19–21 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, B. et al. Causes of the outburst of Zonag Lake in Hoh Xil,Tibetan Plateau, and its impact on surrounding environment. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 38, 305–311 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yao, X., Liu, S., Sun, M., Guo, W. & Zhang, X. Changes of Kusai Lake in Hoh Xil region and causes of its water overflowing. Acta Geogr. Sin. 67, 689–698 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rounce, D. R., Hock, R. & Shean, D. E. Glacier mass change in High Mountain Asia through 2100 using the open-source Python Glacier Evolution Model (PyGEM). Front. Earth Sci. 7, 331 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin, Y. et al. Agricultural risks from changing snowmelt. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 459–465 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jain, M. et al. Groundwater depletion will reduce cropping intensity in India. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd2849 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murakami, D. & Yamagata, Y. Estimation of gridded population and GDP scenarios with spatially explicit statistical downscaling. Sustainability 11, 2106 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De Stefano, L., Petersen-Perlman, J. D., Sproles, E. A., Eynard, J. & Wolf, A. T. Assessment of transboundary river basins for potential hydro-political tensions. Glob. Environ. Change 45, 35–46 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Landerer, F. W. et al. Extending the global mass change data record: GRACE follow-on instrument and science data performance. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088306 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global evaluation of new GRACE mascon products for hydrologic applications. Water Resour. Res. 52, 9412–9429 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E. & Terpenning, I. STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–73 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bergmann, I., Ramillien, G. & Frappart, F. Climate-driven interannual ice mass evolution in Greenland. Glob. Planet. Change 82-83, 1–11 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Frappart, F., Ramillien, G. & Ronchail, J. Changes in terrestrial water storage versus rainfall and discharges in the Amazon basin. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 3029–3046 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rateb, A. et al. Comparison of groundwater storage changes from GRACE satellites with monitoring and modeling of major US aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027556 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huss, M. Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change to mass change. Cryosphere 7, 877–887 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, J., Wang, L., Li, M., Zhu, L. & Li, X. Lake area and volume variation data in the endorheic basin of the Tibetan Plateau from 1989 to 2019. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5543615 (2021).

  47. Sun, A. Y. et al. Combining physically based modeling and deep learning for fusing GRACE satellite data: can we learn from mismatch? Water Resour. Res. 55, 1179–1195 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Govindaraju, R. S. & Artific, A. T. C. A. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5, 115–123 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun, A. Y., Scanlon, B. R, Save, H. & Rateb, A. Reconstruction of GRACE total water storage through automated machine learning. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR028666 (2020).

  50. Sun, Z., Long, D., Yang, W., Li, X. & Pan, Y. Reconstruction of GRACE data on changes in total water storage over the global land surface and 60 basins. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR026250 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K. & Martinez, G. F. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J. Hydrol. 377, 80–91 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kling, H., Fuchs, M. & Paulin, M. Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios. J. Hydrol. 424, 264–277 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ramirez-Villegas, J., Challinor, A. J., Thornton, P. K. & Jarvis, A. Implications of regional improvement in global climate models for agricultural impact research. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024018 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hawkins, E., Osborne, T. M., Ho, C. K. & Challinor, A. J. Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: an idealised case study over Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170, 19–31 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Li, X. et al. Evapotranspiration estimation for Tibetan Plateau headwaters using conjoint terrestrial and atmospheric water balances and multisource remote sensing. Water Resour. Res. 55, 8608–8630 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cannon, A. J., Sobie, S. R. & Murdock, T. Q. Bias correction of GCM precipitation by quantile mapping: how well do methods preserve changes in quantiles and extremes? J. Clim. 28, 6938–6959 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gutowski, W. J. et al. Temporal–spatial scales of observed and simulated precipitation in central US climate. J. Clim. 16, 3841–3847 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tan, J., Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T. & Nelkin, E. J. IMERG V06: changes to the morphing algorithm. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 36, 2471–2482 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wada, Y., de Graaf, I. E. M. & van Beek, L. P. H. High-resolution modeling of human and climate impacts on global water resources. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 8, 735–763 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, J. et al. Recent global decline in endorheic basin water storages. Nat. Geosci. 11, 926–932 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hewitt, K. Glacier change, concentration, and elevation effects in the Karakoram Himalaya, Upper Indus Basin. Mt. Res. Dev. 31, 188–200 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang, G. Dataset of River Basins map over the TP (2016) (National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, 2019); https://doi.org/10.11888/BaseGeography.tpe.249465.file

  64. Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kääb, A. & Treichler, D. Elevation changes of High Mountain Asia from 2000 to 2016, links to GeoTIFFs. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.876545 (2017).

  65. Li, X. et al. A high temporal resolution lake data set from multisource altimetric missions and Landsat archives of water level and storage changes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2000–2017. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.898411 (2019).

  66. Li, X. Y. et al. Supplementary data to: Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6784501 (2022).

  67. Li, X. Y. & Long, D. Supplementary code to: Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6784641 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.L. and F.T. acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 92047301). D.L. also acknowledges support from the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) programme (2019QZKK0105). The authors sincerely thank X. Xu from the Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences for guiding expeditions to the Tibetan Plateau, Y. Wada from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis for providing datasets of global industrial and domestic water demand, Y. Pokhrel from Michigan State University for providing the multimodel weighted mean of TWS projections as a comparison with this study and G. Zheng from Tsinghua University for providing the frozen soil map that supports analysis of component contributions to TWS changes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Xueying Li, Di Long, Xingdong Li, Fuqiang Tian, Zhangli Sun & Guangqian Wang

  2. Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Bridget R. Scanlon

  3. Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Michael E. Mann

Authors
  1. Xueying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Di Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bridget R. Scanlon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael E. Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xingdong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fuqiang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhangli Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Guangqian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.L. and Xueying Li developed the methodology of this study. Xueying Li and D.L. performed the analysis with additional support from B.R.S., M.E.M., Xingdong Li, F.T., Z.S. and G.W. All authors discussed the results and improved the writing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Long.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Mark Giordano, Xingong Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Projected changes in climate variables over the Tibetan Plateau up to 2100.

(a) Annual average temperature, (b) annual precipitation, and (c) annual surface short-wave radiation for the 2002–2100 period were estimated by the ensemble mean of nine CMIP6 models under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Both temperature and surface short-wave radiation were bias corrected using the delta approach, and precipitation was corrected using the quantile mapping approach. Shadows represent uncertainty range of ±1 standard deviation among outputs from different models.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Trends in terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau during 2002–2017.

Results were derived from four GRACE solutions, that is, (a) JPL-M, (b) CSR-M, (c) JPL-SH, and (d) CSR-SH. Stippling marks regions that have a significant trend (the Mann-Kendall test at a 5% significance level).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Terrestrial water storage anomalies and decomposed long-term variabilities.

Monthly time series of (a–d) terrestrial water storage anomaly (TWSA) and (e–h) long-term variability are shown in twelve basins during Apr 2002–Jun 2017. Solid lines are the mean of four GRACE solutions (JPL-M, CSR-M, JPL-SH, and CSR-SH), and shadows represent ±1 standard deviation among different solutions. In particular, TWSA derived from different GRACE solutions in the Inner TP is shown in (i) as an example, where TWSA is shown in solid lines and long-term variability is shown in dash lines.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Observed and projected terrestrial water storage anomalies.

Red lines show GRACE observations from JPL-M during 2002–2017, whereas blue lines show the ensemble mean of machine-learning outputs from nine CMIP6 forcings during 2002–2060 in the (a) Amu Darya and (b) Indus basins. Shadows represent uncertainty range of ±1 standard deviation among outputs from different CMIP6 forcings.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Trends in climate drivers over the Tibetan Plateau during 2002–2017.

Precipitation, temperature, and surface short-wave radiation are analyzed during (a–c) annual, (d–f) summer (June–August), and (g–i) winter (December–February) periods. Stippling marks regions that have a significant trend (the Mann-Kendall test at a 5% significance level). Precipitation data were derived from Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) V06, and temperature and radiation data were derived from reanalysis ERA5 data.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Sections 1–5, Figs. 1–19 and Tables 1–8.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Long, D., Scanlon, B.R. et al. Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 801–807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene