Abstract
Defining corruption has proven to be such a difficult challenge that many contemporary analysts pass over the question as quickly as possible. But while definitions are too important to be dismissed as an analytical concern, a single one-dimensional definition that will satisfy all observers will never be found. Rather than proposing yet another definition, this article explores five dimensions of the concept: corruption as social decline, as deviant behavior, as a logic of exchange, as a system of measurable perceptions, and corruption as “shadow politic”. All help us view corruption within actual social settings; all lend further detail to the sorts of contrasts among concepts and usages that Arnold Heidenheimer explored in his work. In the end one of the most important aspects of the issue is that of trust, which not only helps us understand how corruption functions in actual cases but also underscores the reasons why we must continue to fight it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alemann, U. von, “Politische Moral und politische Kultur in der Bundesrepublik: Vergiften oder reinigen Skandale die Politik?” Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte: Zeitschrift f ür Soziale Theorie und Praxis 1985 (36) 258–269.
Alemann, U. von, “Bureaucratic and Political Corruption Controls: Reassessing the German Record,” in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, and V.T. LeVine (eds.), Political Corruption (New Brunswick/Transaction Publishers, 1989), pp. 855–869.
Alemann, U. von, “Korruption – ein blinder Fleck in der Politikwissenschaft,” Die neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte 1989a (36) 918–921.
Alemann, U. von, “Korruption ist Vertrauenssache,” Capital, 1993 No. 4.
Alemann, U. von, “Schattenpolitik. Streifzüge in die Grauzonen der Politik,” in C. Leggewie (ed.), Wozu Politikwissenschaft?Über das neue in der Politik. (Darmstadt: Wis-senschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1994), pp. 135–144.
Alemann, U. von, “Party Finance, Party Donations and Corruption: The German Case”, in D. Della Porta and S. Rose-Ackerman (eds.), Political Corruption (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002), pp. 102–116.
Bachrach, P. and M. Baratz, “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 1962 (56).
Borchert, J., S. Leitner and K. Stolz (eds.), Politische Korruption (Opladen: Leske und Budrich 2000).
Della Porta, D. and S. Rose-Ackerman (eds.), Corrupt Exchanges: Empirical Themes in the Politics and Political Economy of Corruption (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002).
Della Porta, D. and A. Vannucci, Corrupt Exchanges. Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1999).
Fleck, C. and H. Kuzmics (eds.), Korruption: Zur Soziologie nicht immer abweichenden Ver-haltens (Königstein: Athenäum, 1985).
Friedrich, C.J., Pathologie der Politik. Die Funktion der Mißstände: Gewalt, Verrat, Korruption, Geheimhaltung, Propaganda (Frankfurt, New York: Herder & Herder 1973).
Heidenheimer, A.J., “Disjunctions Between Corruption and Democracy? A Qualitative Ex-ploration.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30–September 2, 2001; reprinted in this issue.
Heidenheimer, A.J. and M. Johnston (eds.), Political Corruptio: Concepts and Contexts (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2002).
Höffling, C., Korruption als soziale Beziehung (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 2002).
Johnston, M., “Comparing Corruption: Conflicts, Standards and Development” XVI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Berlin, 1994.
Lambsdorff, J. Graf, “Wie läßt sich Korruption messen? Der Korruptionsindex von Trans-parency International,” in J. Borchert, S. Leitner and K. Stolz (eds.), Politische Korruption (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 2000) pp. 45–71.
Martiny, Anke, “Korruption – wuchernder Krebsschaden in der Gesellschaft”, in Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte. Beilage zur Wochenzeitung Das Parlament 2001, B32-33, 3–5.
Münkler, H., K. Fischer and H. Bluhm, “Das Ende einer semantischen Karriere? Zur Gegen-begrifflichkeit von Gemeinwohl und politischer Korruption,” in Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften: Berichte und Abhandlungen 8 Berlin, 2000, pp. 425–440.
Pieth, M., P. Eigen (eds.), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr. Bestandsaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1999).
Richter, H.E., Die hohe Kunst der Korruption (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1989).
Rose-Ackerman, S., Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge: University Press 1999).
Senturia, J.J., “Corruption, Political,” in E.R.A. Seligman (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (New York, MacMillan, 1931) pp. 448–452.
Transparency International (ed.) 2002. Corruption Perceptions Index 2002. Berlin, Retrived from http://www.transparency.org/pressreleases archive/2002/2002.08.28.cpi.en.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Von Alemann, U. The unknown depths of political theory: The case for a multidimensional concept of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change 42, 25–34 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000041035.21045.1d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000041035.21045.1d