Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- 4 Quantum versus Classical Information
- 5 Quantum Information and Locality
- 6 Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics
- 7 Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- Index
- References
7 - Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
from Part II - Information and Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
By
Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- 4 Quantum versus Classical Information
- 5 Quantum Information and Locality
- 6 Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics
- 7 Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What is Quantum Information? , pp. 138 - 144Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Ballentine, L. E. (1970). “The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 42: 358–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnum, H., Müller, M. P., and Ududec, C. (2014). “Higher-Order Interference and Single-System Postulates Characterizing Quantum Theory.” New Journal of Physics, 16: 123029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belinfante, F. J. (1973). A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1964). “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.” Physics, 1: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1976). “The Theory of Local Beables.” Epistemological Letters, 9. Reprinted in (1985) Dialectica, 39: 85–96.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1952). “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of Hidden Variables. I & II.” Physical Review, 85: 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1998). The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr. Faye, J. and Folse, H. J. (eds.). Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
Brukner, Č. (2016). “On the Quantum Measurement Problem.” Pp. 95–117 in Bertlmann, R. and Zeilinger, A. (eds.), Quantum UnSpeakables II: Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cabello, A. (2013). “Simple Explanation of the Quantum Violation of a Fundamental Inequality.” Physical Review Letters, 110: 060402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabello, A., Gu, M., Gühne, O., Larsson, J.-Å., and Wiesner, K. (2016). “Thermodynamical Cost of Some Interpretations of Quantum Theory.” Physical Review A, 94: 052127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiribella, G., D’Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. (2011). “Informational Derivation of Quantum Theory.” Physical Review A, 84: 012311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiribella, G. and Yuan, X. (2014). “Measurement Sharpness Cuts Nonlocality and Contextuality in Every Physical Theory.” arXiv:1404.3348.Google Scholar
Dakić, B. and Brukner, Č. (2011). “Quantum Theory and Beyond: Is Entanglement Special?” Pp. 365–392 in Halvorson, H. (ed.), Deep Beauty. Understanding the Quantum World through Mathematical Innovation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, W. M. (1998). Quantum Chance and Nonlocality: Probability and Nonlocality in the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1936). “Physics and Reality.” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221: 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, H. III (1957). “‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faye, J. (2014). “Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. A. (2017). “On Participatory Realism.” Pp. 113–134 in Durham, I. T. and Rickles, D. (eds.), Information and Interaction: Eddington, Wheeler, and the Limits of Knowledge. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., and Schack, R. (2014). “An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics, 82: 749–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. A. and Peres, A. (2000). “Quantum Theory Needs no ‘Interpretation.’” Physics Today, 53: 70–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. A. and Schack, R. (2013). “Quantum-Bayesian Coherence.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 85: 1693–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirardi, G. C. (2011). “Collapse Theories.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T. (1986). “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems.” Physical Review D, 34: 470–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gisin, N. (2012). “Non-realism: Deep Thought or a Soft Option?” Foundations of Physics, 42: 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, S. (2013). “Bohmian Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. B. (1984). “Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Journal of Statistical Physics, 36: 219–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. B. (2014). “The Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Harrigan, N. and Spekkens, R. W. (2010). “Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States.” Foundations of Physics, 40: 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensen, B. et al. (2015). “Loophole-Free Bell Inequality Violation Using Electron Spins Separated by 1.3 Kilometres.” Nature, 526: 682–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jammer, M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kochen, S. (1985). “A New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Pp. 151–169 in Lahti, P. J. and Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: 50 Years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P. (1967). “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.” Journal of Mathematical Mechanics, 17: 59–87.Google Scholar
Leifer, M. S. (2014). “Is the Wavefunction Real?” Unpublished talk at the 12th Biennial IQSA Meeting Quantum Structures (Olomouc, Czech Republic).Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Dieks, D. (2012). “Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Masanes, L. and Müller, M. P. (2011). “A Derivation of Quantum Theory from Physical Requirements.” New Journal of Physics, 13: 063001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermin, N. D. (2012). “Quantum Mechanics: Fixing the Shifty Split.” Physics Today, 65: 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., and Rudolph, T. (2012). “On the Reality of the Quantum State.” Nature Physics, 8: 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational Quantum Mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35: 1637–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spekkens, R. W. (2007). “Evidence for the Epistemic View of Quantum States: A Toy Theory.” Physical Review A, 75: 032110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidman, L. (2015). “Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1972). “A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science.” Pp. 303–366 in Colodny, R. (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes: The Philosophical Challenge of the Quantum Domain. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. (1983). “Law without Law.” Pp. 182–213 in Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H. (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. (1994). At Home in the Universe. Woodbury-New York: American Institute of Physics Press.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, A. (1999). “A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics, 29: 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17
- Cited by