iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01071-7
Detection of Breast Cancer Through Mammogram Using Wavelet-Based LBP Features and IWD Feature Selection Technique | SN Computer Science Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Detection of Breast Cancer Through Mammogram Using Wavelet-Based LBP Features and IWD Feature Selection Technique

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is as one of the common reasons of deaths in women. To detect this cancer in early stage, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system can be designed using X-ray mammograms, which further can assist the doctors and radiologists in their clinical decisions. This paper work proposes a CAD system which is designed by extracting the local binary patterns (LBP) in wavelet domain from mammograms and integrating intelligent water drop (IWD) algorithm to extract most important set of features from extracted features set. With this selected set of features, we then train a support vector machine (SVM) to classify new mammograms. The accuracy, precision and recall rates for our proposed CAD system are found to be 97.9%, 95.499% and 97.3%, respectively. Further, it has been found that the proposed model outperforms many of the existing CAD systems. We have also compared IWD with other Meta-heuristic features selection techniques such as ant colony optimization (ACO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), simulated annealing (SA) and genetic algorithm (GA) and found that it outperforms the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistical data for breast cancer, from Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF). https://www.bcrf.org/breast-cancer-statistics-and-resources.

  2. Suzuki K, Li F, Sone S, Doi K. Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24(9):1138–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2005.852048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zarella MD, Bowman D, Aeffner F, Farahani N, Xthona A, Absar SF, et al. A practical guide to whole slide imaging: a white paper from the digital pathology association. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(2):222–34. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0343-RA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):1083–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.4.1811083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen O, Gøtzsche PC. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiology. 2005;234(2):353–62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2342030897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mirzaalian H, Ahmadzadeh MR, Sadri S, Jafari M. Pre-processing algorithms on digital mammograms. In MVA; 2018 pp. 118–121.

  8. Bandyopadhyay SK. Pre-processing of mammogram images. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2010;2(11):6753–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(4):510–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.730396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Han EY, Jacobs N, Han Q, Wang X, Liu J. Whole mammogram image classification with convolutional neural networks. In 2017 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE; 2017, pp. 700–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217738.

  11. Ibrahim NSA, Soliman NF, Abdallah M, El-Samie FEA. An algorithm for pre-processing and segmentation of mammogram images. In 2016 11th International conference on computer engineering & systems (ICCES). IEEE; 2016, pp. 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2016.7821997.

  12. Hong BW, Sohn BS. Segmentation of regions of interest in mammograms in a topographic approach. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009;14(1):129–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2009.2033269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu W, Dou R, Zhang G. A new method for extracting region of interest in mammograms. In 2013 IEEE international conference on medical imaging physics and engineering. IEEE. 2013; pp. 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIPE.2013.6864540.

  14. Singh VP, Srivastava A, Kulshreshtha D, Chaudhary A, Srivastava R. Mammogram classification using selected GLCM features and random forest classifier. Int J Comput Sci Inf Secur. 2016;14(6):82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mustra M, Grgic M, Rangayyan RM. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Med Biol Eng Compu. 2016;54(7):1003–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1411-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Tang J. Mass classification in mammograms using selected geometry and texture features, and a new SVM-based feature selection method. IEEE Syst J. 2013;8(3):910–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2013.2286539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinlein P, Drexl J, Schneider W. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(3):402–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2003.809632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Du L, You X, Xu H, Gao Z, Tang Y. Wavelet domain local binary pattern features for writer identification. In 2010 20th International conference on pattern recognition. IEEE; 2010, pp. 3691–3694. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.899.

  19. Comer ML, Liu S, Delp EJ. Statistical segmentation of mammograms. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on digital mammography. 1996, pp. 475–478.

  20. Beura S, Majhi B, Dash R. Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer. Neurocomputing. 2015;154:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chandy DA, Christinal AH, Theodore AJ, Selvan SE. Neighbourhood search feature selection method for content-based mammogram retrieval. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55(3):493–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1513-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo ST, Cheng BW. Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods. J Med Syst. 2012;36(2):569–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9518-8 (Epub 2010 May 14).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohanty F, Rup S, Dash B, Majhi B, Swamy MNS. Mammogram classification using contourlet features with forest optimization-based feature selection approach. Multimed Tools Appl. 2019;78(10):12805–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-5804-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh VP, Srivastava R. Automated and effective content-based mammogram retrieval using wavelet based CS-LBP feature and self-organizing map. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2018;38(1):90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2017.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh VP, Srivastava R. Content-based mammogram retrieval using wavelet based complete-LBP and K-means clustering for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Int J Hybrid Intell Syst. 2017;14(1–2):31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chaieb R, Kalti K. Feature subset selection for classification of malignant and benign breast masses in digital mammography. Pattern Anal Appl. 2019;22(3):803–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-018-0760-x.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh VP, Srivastava S, Srivastava R. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(4):709–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-170851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lia Y, Chena H, Yangb Y, Yanga N. Pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms based on homogenous texture and intensity deviation. Pattern Recogn. 2013;46(3):681–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah-Hosseini H. The intelligent water drops algorithm: a nature-inspired swarm-based optimization algorithm. Int J Bio-Inspir Comput. 2009;1(1–2):71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Khatib K. Impact of feature reduction on the efficiency of wireless intrusion detection systems. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst. 2009;21(8):1143–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2009.142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen RC, Cheng KF, Chen YH, Hsieh CF. Using rough set and support vector machine for network intrusion detection system. In 2009 First Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems. IEEE; 2009. pp. 465–470.

  32. Kuang F, Zhang S, Jin Z, Xu W. A novel SVM by combining kernel principal component analysis and improved chaotic particle swarm optimization for intrusion detection. Soft Comput. 2015;19(5):1187–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1332-7.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Pozi MSM, Sulaiman MN, Mustapha N, Perumal T. Improving anomalous rare attack detection rate for intrusion detection system using support vector machine and genetic programming. Neural Process Lett. 2016;44(2):279–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-015-9457-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aghdam MH, Kabiri P. Feature selection for intrusion detection system using ant colony optimization. IJ Netw Secur. 2016;18(3):420–32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suckling J et al. The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series 1069. 1994, pp 375–378. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250394.

  36. Khaoula BS, Saidi MN, Tamtaoui A. A cad system for the detection of abnormalities in the mammograms using the metaheuristic algorithm particle swarm optimization (pso). In international symposium on ubiquitous networking. Springer, Singapore; 2016, pp. 505–517. https://dblp.org/rec/conf/unet/SoulamiST16.html.

  37. Anter AM, Hassenian AElla. Computer aided diagnosis system for mammogram abnormality. In: Dey N, Bhateja V, Hassanien AE, editors. Medical imaging in clinical applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 175–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33793-7_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang S, Rao RV, Chen P, Zhang Y, Liu A, Wei L. Abnormal breast detection in mammogram images by feed-forward neural network trained by jaya algorithm. Fund Inform. 2017;151(1–4):191–211.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Jona J, Nagaveni N. A hybrid swarm optimization approach for feature set reduction in digital mammograms. WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl. 2012;9:340–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Abubacker NF, Azman A, Doraisamy S, Murad MAA. An integrated method of associative classification and neuro-fuzzy approach for effective mammographic classification. Neural Comput Appl. 2017;28(12):3967–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2290-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dhahbi S, Barhoumi W, Zagrouba E. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments. Comput Biol Med. 2015;1(64):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jiao Z, Gao X, Wang Y, Li J. A parasitic metric learning net for breast mass classification based on mammography. Pattern Recognit. 2018;75:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thawkar S, Ingolikar R. Classification of masses in digital mammograms using firefly based optimization. Int J Image Graph Signal Process. 2018;10(2):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhosle U, Deshmukh J. Mammogram classification using AdaBoost with RBFSVM and Hybrid KNN–RBFSVM as base estimator by adaptively adjusting γ and C value. Int J Inf Technol. 2019;11(4):719–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-018-0241-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Görgel P, Sertbas A, Ucan ON. Mammographical mass detection and classification using local seed region growing–spherical wavelet transform (lsrg–swt) hybrid scheme. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(6):765–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kalita DJ, Singh VP, Kumar V. A dynamic framework for tuning SVM hyper parameters based on moth-flame optimization and knowledge-based-search. Expert Syst Appl. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kalita DJ, Singh VP, Kumar V. Two-way threshold-based intelligent water drops feature selection algorithm for accurate detection of breast cancer. Soft Comput. 2022;26:2277–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06498-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by a granted project 1-573645901 from “Collaborative Research Scheme (TEQIP-III)” under “All India council of Technical Education”, New Delhi, India.

Funding

All India Council for Technical Education (1-573645901) Dhruba Jyoti Kalita.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Gaya College of Engineering, Gaya, Bihar, India

    Dhruba Jyoti Kalita

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, India

    Vibhav Prakash Singh

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, India

    Vinay Kumar

Authors
  1. Dhruba Jyoti Kalita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vibhav Prakash Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinay Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibhav Prakash Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalita, D.J., Singh, V.P. & Kumar, V. Detection of Breast Cancer Through Mammogram Using Wavelet-Based LBP Features and IWD Feature Selection Technique. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01071-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01071-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation