iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-019-0112-6
A Three-row Opposed Gripping Mechanism with Bioinspired Spiny Toes for Wall-climbing Robots | Journal of Bionic Engineering Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Three-row Opposed Gripping Mechanism with Bioinspired Spiny Toes for Wall-climbing Robots

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a study of a three-row opposed gripping mechanism made of bioinspired spiny toes. An insect Serica orientalis Motschulsky’s tarsal system was first described and studied. A compliant single spiny toe model was established assuming that the contact asperities were spheres. Following the single toe contact model, a spiny toe array’s contact model was then developed using asperity height’s distribution function. By studying the engaging and disengaging process of the single toe, the mechanical behavior of the toe and toe array were addressed. The toes as well as the arrays were manufactured via rapid prototyping. A customized apparatus using displacement-control method has been carried out to measure the pull-in forces and pull-off positions of the single toe and toe array under various compression conditions. Based on the understanding, a three-row opposed gripping mechanism with radial configuration for wall-climbing robots was designed and fabricated according to the mechanical behaviors of the toe and array. Using an opposed spoke configuration with 3 rows of 31 toes on each linkage array, the mechanism designed as a foot of climbing robots can vertically resist at least 1 kg of load on rough inverted surface, while the maximum normal load is as high as 31 N. The findings may provide a way in developing a high payload wall-climbing robot system for practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Balaguer C, Gimenez A, Abderrahim C. Roma robots for inspection of steel based infrastructures. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2002, 29, 246–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eich M, Vögele T. Design and control of a lightweight magnetic climbing robot for vessel inspection. 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED), Corfu, Greece, 2011, 1200–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu Z L, Ma P S. A wall-climbing robot for labelling scale of oil tank’s volume. Robotica, 2002, 20, 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iborra A, Pastor J A, Alonso D, Alvarez B, Ortiz F J, Navarro P J, Fernández C, Suardiaz J. A cost-effective robotic solution for the cleaning of ships’ hulls. Robotica, 2010, 28, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Resino J C, Jardón A, Giménez A, Balaguer C. Analysis of the direct and inverse kinematics of ROMA II robot. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, 869–874.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prahlad H, Pelrine R, Stanford S, Marlow J, Kornbluh R. Electroadhesive robots—wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, USA, 2008, 3028–3033.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Modern Architecture Affords Innovative Cleaning Solutions, [2018-08-05], http://www.serbot.ch/en/facade-cleaning

  8. Zaaf A, Van D R, Herrel A, Aerts P. Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of level and vertical locomotion in a ground-dwelling and a climbing gecko. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 1233–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair, Nature, 2000, 405, 681–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang Y A, Autumn K, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Fearing R, FullR J, Kenny T W. Adhesion force measurements on single gecko setae. Technical Digest of the 2000 Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, South Carolina, USA, 2000, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattie A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T W, Fearing, R, Israelachvili J N, Full R J. Evidence for van der waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99, 12252–12256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y W, Sun S M, Wu X, Mei T. A wheeled wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine mechanisms. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Persson B N J. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19, 376110.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Federle W, Barnes W J, Baumgartner W, Drechsler P, Smith J M. Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2006, 3, 689–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang W, Wang X L. Biomimetic design of elastomer surface pattern for friction control under wet conditions. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 046001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai Z D, Gorb S N, Schwarz U. Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 2479–2488.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Asbeck A T, Cutkosky M R. Designing compliant spine mechanisms for climbing. Journal of Mechanisms & Robotics, 2012, 4, 031007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu G W, LY W, Wang X J, Wu X, Mei T. Design and experiment of a bioinspired wall-climbing robot using spiny grippers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China, 2016, 665–670.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim S, Asbeck A T, Provancher W, Cutkosky M R. Spinybot II: Climbing hard walls with compliant microspines. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Seatle, USA, 2005, 601–606.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Autumn K, Buehler M, Cutkosky M, Fearing R, Full R J, Goldman D, Groff R, Provancher W, Rizzi A A, Saranli U, Saunders A, Koditschek D E. Robotics in scansorial environments. Proceedings of the SPIE 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 2005, 5804, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spenko M J, Haynes G C, Sanders J A, Cutkosky M R, Koditschek D E. Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 2008, 25, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haynes G C, Khripin A, Lynch G, Amory J, Saunders A, Rizzi A A, Koditschek D E. Rapid pole climbing with a quadrupedal robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, 2009, 2767–2772.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu X, Liu G W, Wang X J, Liu Y W, Mei T. Study of a bioinspired wall-climbing robot: Contact mechanism and performance. Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Smart Materials, Snowbird, USA, 2017, V001T006A002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parness A, Frost M, Thatte N, King J P, Witkoe K, Nevarez M, Garrett M, Aghazarian H, Kennedy B. Gravity independent rock-climbing robot and a sample acquisition tool with microspine grippers. Journal of Field Robotics, 2013, 30, 897–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parness A. Anchoring foot mechanisms for sampling and mobility in microgravity. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, 6596–6599.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51605467) and the Changzhou Key Laboratory of High Technology (Grant No. CM20183004). The authors would like to thank Dr. Yanwei Liu from Xi’an University of Technology for technical discussion, and Anthony Wang from Boston College for editing and proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changzhou, 213164, China

    Chao Xie, Xuan Wu & Xiaojie Wang

  2. Department of Precision Machinery and Precision Instrumentation, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China

    Chao Xie

Authors
  1. Chao Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaojie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojie Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, C., Wu, X. & Wang, X. A Three-row Opposed Gripping Mechanism with Bioinspired Spiny Toes for Wall-climbing Robots. J Bionic Eng 16, 994–1006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-019-0112-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-019-0112-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation