iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1453-9
Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data | International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Nowadays, with the increased diffusion of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) scanners in dental and maxillo-facial practice, 3D cephalometric analysis is emerging. Maxillofacial surgeons and dentists make wide use of cephalometric analysis in diagnosis, surgery and treatment planning. Accuracy and repeatability of the manual approach, the most common approach in clinical practice, are limited by intra- and inter-subject variability in landmark identification. So, we propose a computer-aided landmark annotation approach that estimates the three-dimensional (3D) positions of 21 selected landmarks.

Methods

The procedure involves an adaptive cluster-based segmentation of bone tissues followed by an intensity-based registration of an annotated reference volume onto a patient Cone Beam CT (CBCT) head volume. The outcomes of the annotation process are presented to the clinician as a 3D surface of the patient skull with the estimate landmark displayed on it. Moreover, each landmark is centered into a spherical confidence region that can help the clinician in a subsequent manual refinement of the annotation. The algorithm was validated onto 18 CBCT images.

Results

Automatic segmentation shows a high accuracy level with no significant difference between automatically and manually determined threshold values. The overall median value of the localization error was equal to 1.99 mm with an interquartile range (IQR) of 1.22–2.89 mm.

Conclusion

The obtained results are promising, segmentation was proved to be very robust and the achieved accuracy level in landmark annotation was acceptable for most of landmarks and comparable with other available methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF (2011) New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:606–622. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bettega G, Payan Y, Mollard B, Boyer A, Raphael B, Lavallèe S (2000) A simulator for maxillofacial surgery integrating 3D cephalometry and orthodontia. Comput Aided Surg 5:156–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurst CA, Eppley BL, Havlik RJ, Sadove AM (2007) Surgical cephalometrics: applications and developments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:92e–104e. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000282728.97278.a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pittayapat P, Limchaichana-Bolstad N, Willems G, Jacobs R (2014) Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:69–91. doi:10.1111/ocr.12034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F (2006) Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:410–416. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Okshi A, Lindh C, Salé H, Gunnarsson M, Rohlin M (2015) Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 88:20140658. doi:10.1259/bjr.20140658

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weissheimer A, Menezes LM, Koerich L, Pham J, Cevidanes LHS (2015) Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:1188–1196. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.04.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Y, Luebbers H-T, Agbaje JO, Schepers S, Vrielinck L, Lambrichts I, Politis C (2013) Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 41:522–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Barth E-L, De Groeve P, De Mey A (2006) A new method of 3-D cephalometry part I: the anatomic cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 17:314–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Titiz I, Laubinger M, Keller T, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U (2011) Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks—a three-dimensional computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod 34:1–11. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq190

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D, Moreno Uribe L, Allareddy V, Finkelstein M, Ruprecht A (2013) Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 42:1–11. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20130059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng Y, Leow WK (2012) Automatic identification of frankfurt plane and mid-sagittal plane of skull. IEEE Work Appl Comput Vis 2012:233–238. doi:10.1109/WACV.2012.6162994

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keustermans J, Mollemans W, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (2010) Automated cephalometric landmark identification using shape and local appearance models. In: IEEE 20th International conference on pattern recognition, pp 2464–2467

  14. Keustermans J, Smeets D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (2011) Automated cephalometric landmark localization using sparse shape and appearance models. In: International workshop on machine learning medical imaging. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 249–256

  15. Wang L, Chen KC, Gao Y, Shi F, Liao S, Li G, Shen SGF, Yan J, Lee PKM, Chow B, Liu NX, Xia JJ, Shen D (2014) Automated bone segmentation from dental CBCT images using patch-based sparse representation and convex optimization. Med Phys 41:043503. doi:10.1118/1.4868455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shahidi S, Bahrampour E, Soltanimehr E, Zamani A, Oshagh M, Moattari M, Mehdizadeh A (2014) The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images. BMC Med Imaging 14:32. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-14-32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Makram M, Kamel H (2014) Reeb graph for automatic 3D cephalometry. Int J Image Process 8:17–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK (2015) A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1737–1752. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Oliveira AEF, Cevidanes LHS, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D (2009) Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:256–265. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F, Hausamen JE (2005) Three-dimensional cephalometry: a color atlas and manual. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sagawa M, Miyoseta Y, Hayakawa Y, Honda A (2009) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional filtering methods to improve image quality in multiplanar reconstruction of cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 25:154–158. doi:10.1007/s11282-009-0026-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassan B, Souza PC, Jacobs R, de Azambuja Berti S, van der Stelt P (2010) Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 14:303–310. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0291-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pham DL, Xu C, Prince JL (2000) Current methods in medical image segmentation 1. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:315–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng HP, Ong SH, Foong KWC, Goh PS, Nowinski WL (2006) Medical image segmentation using K-means clustering and improved watershed algorithm. In: 2006 IEEE southwest symposium on image analysis and interpretation pp 61–65

  25. MacKay DJ (2003) Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gao Y, Zhan Y, Shen D (2014) Incremental learning with selective memory (ILSM): towards fast prostate localization for image guided radiotherapy yaozong. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:518–534. doi:10.1109/TMI.2013.2291495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Gao W, Huang S, Nowinski WL (2008) A model-based, semi-global segmentation approach for automatic 3-D point landmark localization in neuroimages. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:1034–1044. doi:10.1109/TMI.2008.915684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frantz S, Rohr K, Stiehl HS (2000) Localization of 3D anatomical point landmarks in 3D tomographic images using deformable models. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention 2000. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 492–501

  29. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46:R1–R45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Myronenko A, Song X (2010) Intensity-based image registration by minimizing residual complexity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1882–1891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721. doi:10.1109/42.796284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baan F, Liebregts J, Xi T, Schreurs R, de Koning M, Bergé S, Maal T (2016) A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the orthognathic analyser. PLoS One 11:e0149625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149625

  33. Puisoru M, Forna N, Fatu A, Fuatu R, Fuatu C (2006) Analysis of mandibular variability in humans of different geographic areas. Ann Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 188:547–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ (2012) Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 34:263–275. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133, Milano, MI, Italy

    Marina Codari, Gianluca M. Tartaglia & Chiarella Sforza

  2. CIMeC, Università degli Studi di Trento, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy

    Matteo Caffini

  3. SST Dentofacial Clinic, 20090, Segrate, MI, Italy

    Gianluca M. Tartaglia

  4. Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133, Milano, MI, Italy

    Giuseppe Baselli

Authors
  1. Marina Codari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Caffini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gianluca M. Tartaglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chiarella Sforza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Baselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiarella Sforza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Marina Codari, Matteo Caffini, Chiarella Sforza, Gianluca M. Tartaglia and Giuseppe Baselli declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Staement of human rights

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the SST Dental Clinic (IRB03-2015 Doc. MQ 03 AL 02-MC).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Codari, M., Caffini, M., Tartaglia, G.M. et al. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Int J CARS 12, 113–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1453-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation