iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-009-0125-y
Common (stock) sense about risk-shifting and bank bailouts | Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Skip to main content
Log in

Common (stock) sense about risk-shifting and bank bailouts

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If a bank is facing insolvency, it will be tempted to reject good loans and accept bad loans so as to shift risk onto its creditors. We analyze the effectiveness of buying up toxic mortgages in troubled banks, buying preferred stock, and buying common stock. If bailing out banks deemed “too big to fail” involves buying assets at above fair market values, then these banks are encouraged ex ante to gamble on bad assets. Buying up common (preferred) stock is always the most (least) ex ante- and ex post-efficient type of capital infusion, regardless of whether the bank volunteers for the recapitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, S.: Charter value, minimum bank capital requirement and deposit insurance pricing in equilibrium. J. Bank. Finance 20, 351–375 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V.V., Yorulmazer, T.: Too many to fail—an analysis of time-inconsistency in bank closure policies. J. Financ. Intermed. 16, 1–31 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, V.V., Yorulmazer, T.: Cash-in-the-market pricing and optimal resolution of bank failures. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21, 2705–2742 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Bolton, P., Fries, S.: Optimal design of bank bailouts: the case of transition economies. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 155, 51–70 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., Cowan, S., Vickers, J.: Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and the British Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C., Shoven, J., Whalley, J.: The total welfare cost of the united states tax system: a general equilibrium approach. Nat. Tax J. 38, 125–140 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J.M., Horvitz, P.M.: Response of distressed firms to incentives: thrift institution performance under the fslic management consignment program. FM: J. Financ. Manag. Assoc. 22(3), 176–184 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L.A.: A better plan for addressing the financial crisis. Economists’ Voice 5(5) (2008), Article 7

  • Bernhardsen, T., Kloster, A., Smith, E., Syrstad, O.: The financial crisis in Norway: effects on financial markets and measures taken. Finan. Mark. Portf. Manag. 23, 361–381 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brommundt, B., Felsenheimer, J., Gisdakis, P., Zaiser, M.: Recent developments in credit markets. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 20, 221–234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Dinc, S.: Too many to fail? Evidence of regulatory reluctance in bank failures when the banking sector is weak. Rev. Financ. Stud. (2010, forthcoming)

  • Caballero, R.J., Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.: Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 1943–1977 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P.K., Thakor, A.V.: Incentive effects of benevolent intervention, the case of government loan guarantees. J. Public Econ. 26, 169–189 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office: The troubled asset relief program: report on transactions through December 31, 2008 (2009)

  • Congressional Oversight Panel: February oversight report, valuing the treasury’s Assets, February 6, 2009 (2009)

  • Cordella, T., Yeyati, E.L.: Bank bailouts: moral hazard vs. value effect. J. Financ. Intermed. 12, 300–330 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D.W., Rajan, R.G.: Bank bailouts and aggregate liquidity. Am. Econ. Rev. 92, 38–41 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, X.: Optimal bail out policy, conditionality and constructive ambiguity. Social Science Research Network (1999)

  • Goolsbee, A.: Taxes, organizational form and the dead weight loss of the corporate income tax. J. Public Econ. 69, 143–152 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, G., Huang, L.: Liquidity, efficiency, and bank bailouts. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 455–483 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C.R.: The financial crisis of 2008: what needs to happen after TARP. Working Paper, Duke University (2008)

  • Hoggarth, G., Reidhill, J., Sinclair, P.: On the resolution of banking crises: theory and evidence. Bank of England Working Paper No. 229 (2004)

  • Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3, 305–360 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasa, K., Spiegel, M.M.: The role of relative performance in bank closure decisions. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Economic Review, pp. 17–29 (2008)

  • Malaith, G.J., Mester, L.J.: A positive analysis of bank closure. J. Financ. Intermed. 3, 272–299 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C.: On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance 29, 449–470 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.C., Tirole, J.: Interbank lending and systemic risk. J. Money Credit Bank. 28, 733–762 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, A.: Liquidity risk, credit risk, and the federal reserve’s responses to the crisis. Financ. Mark. Portf. Manag. 23, 335–348 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIGTARP: Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Factors affecting efforts to limit payments to AIG counterparties, SIGTARP-10-003, November 17, 2009

  • Veronesi, P., Zingales, L.: Paulson’s gift. Working Paper, University of Chicago (2008)

  • Wilson, L.: Debt overhang and bank bailouts. Social Science Research Network (2009)

  • Wilson, L.: The put problem with buying toxic assets. Appl. Financ. Econ. 20(1–2), 31–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingales, L.: Why Paulson is wrong. Economists’ Voice 5(5), Article 3 (2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linus Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, L., Wu, Y.W. Common (stock) sense about risk-shifting and bank bailouts. Financ Mark Portf Manag 24, 3–29 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-009-0125-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-009-0125-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation