Abstract
The ambitious capacity and pervasiveness requirements for future broadband wireless networks pose new challenges in the design of high capacity point-to-point (PtP) wireless microwave backhaul links. Multiple input multiple output (MIMO) architectures are the main solution for multiplying the wireless links capacity and their effectiveness has been already demonstrated in the PtP case, where channel propagation is dominated by the line-of-sight (LoS) component. In this paper we investigate the impact and performance of suppression methods for one of the main impairments in these systems, i.e. phase noise. In LoS-MIMO systems, the phase noise impact increases as the channel matrix leaves the orthogonality condition, in order to achieve practical antenna spacings and link distances. Here architectures for phase noise suppression based on pilots patterns are compared and discussed for the LoS-MIMO \((2 \times 2)\) system, revealing the advantages and numerical performance of the design options.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Notice the difference between \(\varepsilon _{\textit{TOT}}^2\), i.e. the sources phase noise power and \(\epsilon ^2\), i.e. the residual phase noise power after phase noise estimation.
References
Coldrey, M., Koorapaty, H., Berg, J., Gebretensae, Z., Hansryd, J., Derneryd, A., & Falahati, S. (2012). Small-cell wireless backhauling: A non-line-of-sight approach for point-to-point microwave links. In Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference-Fall 2012 (pp. 1–5).
Hansryd, J., & Edstam, J. (2011). Microwave capacity evolution. Ericsson Review, (1), 22–27.
Tipmongkolsilp, O., Zaghloul, S., & Jukan, S. (2011). The evolution of cellular backhaul technologies: Current issues and future trends. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 13(1), 97–113.
Driessen, P. F., & Foschini, G. J. (1999). On the capacity formula for multiple input-multiple output wireless channels: A geometric interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47(2), 173–176.
Bohagen, F., Orten, P., & Oien, G. E. (2007). Design of optimal high-rank line-of-sight MIMO channels. IEEE Transactions Wireless Communications, 6(4), 1420–1425.
Calabrò, S., Lankl, B., & Sebald, G. (2004). Multiple co-polar co-channel point-to-point transmission. AEU International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 58(1), 51–57.
Reggiani, L., Baccetti, B., & Dossi, L. (2013). The role of adaptivity in MIMO line-of-sight systems for high capacity backhauling. Wireless Personal Communications, 74, 373–389.
Durisi, G., Tarable, A., Camarda, C., Devassy, R., & Montorsi, G. (2014). Capacity bounds for MIMO microwave backhaul links affected by phase noise. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(3), 920–929.
Hadaschik, N., Dörpinghaus, M., Senst, A., Harmjanz, O., Käufer, U., Ascheid, G., et al. (2005). Improving MIMO phase noise estimation by exploiting spatial correlations. In IEEE International Conference on ICASSP.
Proakis, J. G. (1995). Digital communications (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simon, V., Senst, A., Speth, M., & Meyr, H. (2001). Phase noise estimation via adapted interpolation. IEEE GLOBECOM’01, 6, 3297–3301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: A Wiener filter for the \(2 \times 2\) LoS-MIMO
Appendix: A Wiener filter for the \(2 \times 2\) LoS-MIMO
The variables (12) are observed during \(F\) pilot periods, each one of length \(P\) symbols, generating \((F+1)\) observables. These variables are collected in the column vector \(\varvec{\eta }_{lP}\), where \(lP\) is the current pilot time instant. Observations span from \((lP-L)\) to \((lP-L+{FP})\) with \(L=\lfloor {F/2}\rfloor {P}\). From vector \(\varvec{\eta }_{lP}\), of length \(4(F+1)\),
the cross covariance matrix \({\varvec{C}}_{\eta \eta }\) with dimension \(4(F+1)\times 4(F+1)\) is computed as
Its generic element in position \((i,j)\) can be expressed as
with \(m_{1},n_{1},m_{2},n_{2}=1,2\), \(\varDelta \in [-FP:P:FP]\), \(i=[(F+1)(m_1-1+(n_1-1)2(F+1))+|\varDelta /P|+1]\) and \(j=[(F+1)(m_2-1+(n_2-1)2(F+1))+|\varDelta /P|+1]\), and where the cross correlation \(r_{m_{1}n_{1};m_{2}n_{2}}(\varDelta )\), assuming uncorrelated phase noise processes between transmitter and receiver, can be expressed as
with \(r^{(R)}_{m_{1}m_{2}}\) and \(r^{(T)}_{n_{1}n_{2}}\) the correlations between phase noise processes respectively at the two receivers and at the two transmitters. Only for \(m_{1}=m_{2}\), \(n_{1}=n_{2}\) and \(\varDelta =0\) the noise term is present (additive noise contributions are assumed uncorrelated).
To estimate the phase noise processes \(\widehat{\varphi }_{mn;lP+i}\), where \(i=2,3, \cdots ,(P-1)\) is the interpolating symbol instant, four filter coefficients vectors of length \((F+1)\), i.e. a total of \(4(F+1)\) coefficients, are computed according to
where the vector \(\mathbf c _{\eta \varphi _{mn;lP+i}}\) contains the correlations \(E[\varvec{\eta }_{lP}\cdot \varphi _{mn;lP+i}]\), i.e.
The four-dimensional Wiener coefficients vectors \(\mathbf w _{mn;i}\), i.e.
are then used to estimate the phase noise process as sketched in Fig. 13:
Finally, assuming i.i.d. estimation error processes w.r.t. the period \(l\) and the indexes \((m,n)\), the mean squared estimation error \(E[(\varphi ^e)^2]\) is defined as
where the sum-processes vectors \(\varvec{\varphi }_{lP}\) and \(\widehat{\varvec{\varphi }}_{lP}\) have length \(4(P-2)\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reggiani, L., Filiberti, G. & Dossi, L. Phase Noise Suppression in MIMO LoS Systems for High Capacity Backhauling. Wireless Pers Commun 82, 1931–1953 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2323-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2323-4