Abstract
This paper discusses how Arthur C. Clarke’s four-volume Odyssey series (1968–1997) and Charles Stross’s Accelerando (2005) relate to humanity’s narcissistic injuries. Here, powerful AIs threaten the self-perception of humanity, which intuitively assumes that it holds a central position in the universe. Clarke’s and Stross’s texts are representative of changing AI visions between the optimistic can-do spirit of the post-war era and the irritated mood at the onset of the twenty-first century. Both texts serve as access points to the history of technological science, as Clarke exploits Norbert Wiener’s early cybernetics and Stross elaborates on Vernor Vinge’s and Nick Land’s speculative thought. AI takeover represents an existential destabilization that revolves around an uncomfortable question: How does humanity relate to its forthcoming redundancy?
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (2001). Californian ideology. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), Crypto anarchy, cyberstates, and pirate utopias (pp. 363–387). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Bostrum, N. (2017). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Réponses: Pour une anthropologie reflexive. Seuil.
Canavan, G. (2020). Charles stross: Accelerando. In A. McFarlane, G. J. Murphy, & L. Schmeink (Eds.), The Routledge companion to cyberpunk culture (pp. 56–63). Routledge.
Chirimuuta, M. (2020). The reflex machine and the cybernetic brain: The critique of abstraction and its application to computationalism. Perspectives on Science, 28(3), 421–457.
Clarke, A. T. (1984). 2010: Odyssey two. Del Rey.
Clarke, A. T. (1997). 3001: The final Odyssey. Del Rey.
Clarke, A. T. (2014). 2001: A space Odyssey. Orbit.
Cooke, P. (1995). The rise of the rustbelt: revitalizing older industrial regions. Routledge.
Freud, S. (1981). The standard edition of the complete psychological works. Volume XVII (1917-1919): An infantile neurosis and other works (J. Strachey, Trans.). Hogarth.
Gomes da Costa, D. L. P. (2019). Reviewing the concept of technological singularities: How can it explain human evolution. NanoEthics, 13, 119–130.
Gutiérrez-Jones, C. (2014). Neuromancer and artificial intelligence. Science Fiction Studies, 41(1), 69–92.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
Kline, R. R. (2015). The cybernetics moment: or why we call our age the information age. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin.
Land, Nick. (2017). Circuitries. In R. Mackay & A. Avanessian (Eds.), #Accelerate: The accerationist reader (pp. 251–274). Falmouth Urbanomic.
Lem, S. (1984). Imaginary magnitude (M. E. Heine, Trans.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Mackay, R., & Armen, A. (2017). Introduction. In: R. M. and A. A. (Eds.), #Accelerate: The accerationist reader (pp. 1–50). Falmouth: Urbanomic.
Miller, C. J., & Van Riper, A. B. (2018). Homo machinus: Kubrick’s Two HALs and the evolution of monstrous machines. In J. Fenwick (Ed.), Understanding Kubrick’s 2001: A space Odyssey: Representation and interpretation (pp. 115–128). Intellect.
Naqvi, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence for audit, forensic accounting, and valuation: A strategic perspective. Wiley.
Pickering, A. (2010). The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. University of Chicago Press.
Raucher, K. X. (2013). Metastasis and metastability: A Deleuzian approach to information. Sense.
Rid, T. (2016). Rise of the machines: A cybernetic history. WW Norton.
Savage, R. (2010). Paleoanthropology of the future: The prehistory of posthumanity in Arthur C. Clarke’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. Extrapolation 51(1), 99–112.
Stross, C. (2013). Accelerando. Orbit.
Suarez, D. (2010). Daemon. Signet.
Suvin, D. (1980). Metamorphoses of science fiction. World Literature Today, 54(4), 703–704.
Szollosy, M. (2017). Freud, Frankenstein and our fear of robots: Projection in our cultural perception of technology. AI & Society, 43, 433–439.
Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 236, 433–460.
Vernor. V. (1993). Technological singularity. field robotics center, https://frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/book98/com.ch1/vinge.singularity.html. Accessed January 29, 2021.
Warf, B. (2006). Rustbelt. In: B. W. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 418–419). SAGE.
Warrick, P. S. (1980). The cybernetic imagination in science fiction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Wiener, N. (1985). Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Programme SASPRO 2 COFUND Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 945478.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaminski, J.D. On human expendability: AI takeover in Clarke’s Odyssey and Stross’s Accelerando. Neohelicon 49, 495–511 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00670-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00670-w