iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0113-x
Monitoring Smartphones for Anomaly Detection | Mobile Networks and Applications Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Monitoring Smartphones for Anomaly Detection

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we demonstrate how to monitor a smartphone running Symbian operating system and Windows Mobile in order to extract features for anomaly detection. These features are sent to a remote server because running a complex intrusion detection system on this kind of mobile device still is not feasible due to capability and hardware limitations. We give examples on how to compute relevant features and introduce the top ten applications used by mobile phone users based on a study in 2005. The usage of these applications is recorded by a monitoring client and visualized. Additionally, monitoring results of public and self-written malwares are shown. For improving monitoring client performance, Principal Component Analysis was applied which lead to a decrease of about 80% of the amount of monitored features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the sense of this work, we will use the expressions smartphone, mobile phone and mobile device equivalently.

  2. Global Positioning System.

  3. Global System for Mobile Communications.

  4. Short Message Service.

  5. General Packet Radio Service.

  6. Wideband Code Division Multiple Access.

  7. Freedom of Mobile Multimedia Access.

  8. Universal Mobile Telecommunications System.

  9. Infrared Data Association.

  10. Formerly: Simple Object Access Protocol.

  11. Tested on Version 9.1 S60 3rd.

  12. International Mobile Equipment Identity.

  13. International Mobile Subscriber Identity.

  14. http://code.google.com/android/.

  15. Will be substituted with MP3 (19%) due to UMTS usage and increasing interest for MP3 capabilities on devices.

  16. This class was removed since all values are already represented.

  17. http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/.

References

  1. Abowd GD, Iftode L, Mitchel H (2005) The Smart phone: a first platform for pervasive computing. IEEE Perv Comput 4:18–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albayrak S, Scheel C, Milosevic D, Müller A (2005) Combining self-organizing map algorithms for robust and scalable intrusion detection. In: Mohammadian M (ed) Proceedings of international conference on computational intelligence for modelling control and automation (CIMCA 2005). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 123–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen J, Christie A, Fithen W, McHugh J, Pickel J, Stoner E (2000) State of the practice of intrusion detection technologies. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-99-TR-028. Carnegie Mellon Software Engeneering Institue, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 15213–3890

  4. Axelsson S (2000) Intrusion detection systems: a survey and taxonomy. Technical Report 99-15. Department of Computer Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden

  5. Buennemeyer TK, Nelson TM, Clagett LM, Dunning JP, Marchany RC, Tront JG (2008) Mobile device profiling and intrusion detection using smart batteries. In: HICSS ’08: Proceedings of the proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, p 296. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.319

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft Telekommunikation und neue Medien e.V.-BITKOM (2006) Mehr Handys als Einwohner in Deutschland. http://www.bitkom.de/41015_40990.aspx

  7. Bulygin Y (2007) Epidemics of mobile worms. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE international performance computing and communications conference, IPCCC 2007, New Orleans, 11–13 April 2007. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 475–478

    Google Scholar 

  8. Canalys (2006) EMEA Q3 2006—Highlight From the Canalys Research. http://www.canalys.com/pr/2006/r2006102.htm. http://www.canalys.com/ (online visited 2007.10.04)

  9. Cheng J, Wong SHY, Yang H, Lu S (2007) Smartsiren: virus detection and alert for smartphones. In: International conference on mobile systems, applications, and services (Mobisys 2007), Puerto Rico, 11–14 June 2007, pp. 258–271

  10. Davis G, Davis N (2004) Battery-based intrusion detection. In: Global telecommunications conference, 2004. GLOBECOM ’04, vol 4. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 2250–2255. doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2004.1378409

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deegalla S, Bostrom H (2006) Reducing high-dimensional data by principal component analysis vs. random projection for nearest neighbor classification. In: ICMLA ’06: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on machine learning and applications. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 245–250. doi:10.1109/ICMLA.2006.43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Forrest S, Perelson AS, Allen L, Cherukuri R (1994) Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on research in security and privacy. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, pp 202–212

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glickman M, Balthrop J, Forrest S (2005) A machine learning evaluation of an artificial immune system. Evol Comput 13(2):179–212 (2005). doi:10.1162/1063656054088503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gostev A (2006) Mobile malware evolution: An overview, part 1. http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=200119916

  15. Gröber M (2007) Applications for Symbian. http://www.mgroeber.de/epoc.htm (15 Aug 2007)

  16. Hofmeyr S, Forrest S (2000) Architecture for an artificial immune system. Evol Comput J 8(4):443–473. doi:10.1162/106365600568257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jamaluddin J, Zotou N, Edwards R, Coulton P (2004) Mobile phone vulnerabilities: a new generation of malware. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international symposium on consumer Electronics. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 199–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer series in information sciences, vol 30, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg. ISBN 3–540–67921–9, ISSN 0720–678X

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lawton G (2002) Open source security: opportunity or oxymoron? Comput 35(3):18–21. doi:10.1109/2.989921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luther K, Bye R, Alpcan T, Albayrak S, Müller A (2007) A cooperative AIS framework for intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2007), Glasgow, 24–28 June 2007

  21. Microsoft Corporation (2007) Windows Mobile. http://www.microsoft.com/germany/windowsmobile/default.mspx. http://www.microsoft.com/ (online visited 2007.10.04)

  22. Miettinen M, Halonen P, Hätönen K (2006) Host-based intrusion detection for advanced mobile devices. In: AINA ’06: proceedings of the 20th international conference on advanced information networking and applications, vol 2 (AINA’06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp. 72–76. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2006.192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Nokia (2007) Nokia E61. http://www.nokia.co.uk/A4221036 (15 Aug 2007)

  24. Oberheide J, Cooke E, Jahanian F (2008) Cloudav: N-version antivirus in the network cloud. In: Proceedings of the 17th USENIX security symposium (Security’08), San Jose, 28 July–1 August 2008

  25. Rhodes BC, Mahaffey JA, Cannady JD (2000) Multiple self-organizing maps for intrusion detection. In: 23rd National information systems security conference—PROCEEDINGS, PAPERS, and SLIDE PRESENTATIONS. http://csrc.nist.gov/nissc/2000/proceedings/2000proceedings.html (2007-04-19)

  26. Roussos G, March AJ, Maglavera S (2005) Enabling pervasive computing with Smart phones. IEEE Perv Comput 4:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spafford E, Zamboni D (2000) Data collection mechanisms for intrusion detection systems. CERIAS Technical Report 2000-08. CERIAS, Purdue University, 1315 Recitation Building, West Lafayette, IN

  28. Symbian Software Limited (2007) Symbian OS—the mobile operating system. http://www.symbian.com (online visited 2007.10.04)

  29. TNS Technology (2005) Consumer trends in mobile applications—a TNS technology briefing for technology decision makers. http://www.tns-global.com/ (online visited 2007.10.04)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DAI-Labor, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Aubrey-Derrick Schmidt, Frank Peters, Florian Lamour, Christian Scheel, Seyit Ahmet Çamtepe & Şahin Albayrak

Authors
  1. Aubrey-Derrick Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Florian Lamour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Scheel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seyit Ahmet Çamtepe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Şahin Albayrak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aubrey-Derrick Schmidt.

Additional information

This work was funded by Deutsche Telekom Laboratories.

Appendix: Definitions

Appendix: Definitions

The detection result charts base on the following definitions where Table 10 shows a description on the detection classification:

  • TP = True Positives

  • FN = False Negatives

  • FP = False Positives

  • TN = True Negatives

  • FA = False Alarm

$$Accuracy = \frac{TP+TN}{TP+TN+FP+FN} $$
(1)
$$TP\:Rate = \frac{TP}{TP+FN} $$
(2)
$$FP\:Rate = \frac{FP}{TP+FP} $$
(3)
$$Quality = \frac{TP}{TP+FN} $$
(4)
$$False\:Alarm = \frac{FP}{FP+TN} $$
(5)
Table 10 Detection event description
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, AD., Peters, F., Lamour, F. et al. Monitoring Smartphones for Anomaly Detection. Mobile Netw Appl 14, 92–106 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0113-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-008-0113-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation