Abstract
Sorting by Genome Rearrangements is a classic problem in Computational Biology. Several models have been considered so far, each of them defines how a genome is modeled (for example, permutations when assuming no duplicated genes, strings if duplicated genes are allowed, and/or use of signs on each element when gene orientation is known), and which rearrangements are allowed. Recently, a new problem, called Sorting by Multi-Cut Rearrangements, was proposed. It uses the k-cut rearrangement which cuts a permutation (or a string) at \(k \ge 2\) places and rearranges the generated blocks to obtain a new permutation (or string) of same size. This new rearrangement may model chromoanagenesis, a phenomenon consisting of massive simultaneous rearrangements. Similarly as the Double-Cut-and-Join, this new rearrangement also generalizes several genome rearrangements such as reversals, transpositions, revrevs, transreversals, and block-interchanges. In this paper, we extend a previous work based on unsigned permutations and strings to signed permutations. We show the complexity of this problem for different values of k, and that the approximation algorithm proposed for unsigned permutations with any value of k can be adapted to signed permutations. We also show a 1.5-approximation algorithm for the specific case \(k=4\), as well as a generic approximation algorithm applicable for any \(k\ge 5\), that always reaches constant ratio. The latter makes use of the cycle graph, a well-known structure in genome rearrangements. We implemented and tested the proposed algorithms on simulated data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sets and implemented algorithms are available in the following repository: https://github.com/compbiogroup/Approximation-Algorithms-for-Sorting-by-k-Cuts-on-Signed-Permutations.
References
Alekseyev MA (2008) Multi-break rearrangements and breakpoint re-uses: from circular to linear genomes. J Comput Biol 15(8):1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2008.0080
Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA (2008) Multi-break rearrangements and chromosomal evolution. Theoret Comp Sci 395(2–3):193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2008.01.013
Alexandrino AO, Oliveira AR, Dias U, Dias Z (2020) On the complexity of some variations of sorting by transpositions. J Univer Comp Sci 26(9):1076–1094. https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.2020.057
Bafna V, Pevzner PA (1998) Sorting by transpositions. SIAM J Discr Math 11(2):224–240. https://doi.org/10.1137/S089548019528280X
Bulteau L, Fertin G, Jean G, Komusiewicz C (2021) Sorting by multi-cut rearrangements. Algorithms 14(6):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14060169
Bulteau L, Fertin G, Rusu I (2012) Sorting by transpositions is difficult. SIAM J Discr Math 26(3):1148–1180. https://doi.org/10.1137/110851390
Christie DA (1996) Sorting permutations by block-interchanges. Infor Process Lett 60(4):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(96)00155-X
Elias I, Hartman T (2006) A 1375-approximation algorithm for sorting by transpositions. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 3(4):369–379. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2006.44
Fertin G, Labarre A, Rusu I, Tannier É, Vialette S (2009) Combinatorics of genome rearrangements. computational molecular biology. The MIT Press, London, England. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262062824.001.0001
Hannenhalli S, Pevzner PA (1999) Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. J ACM 46(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/300515.300516
Holland AJ, Cleveland DW (2012) Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Med 18(11):1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2988
Lin GH, Xue G (2001) Signed genome rearrangement by reversals and transpositions: models and approximations. Theoret Comp Sci 259(1–2):513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00038-4
Oliveira A.R, Alexandrino A.O, Jean G, Fertin G, Dias U, Dias Z (2022) Sorting by k-cuts on signed permutations. In: Comparative genomics. RECOMB-CG 2022, La Jolla, CA, USA. Lecture notes in computer science. vol. 13234, pp. 189–204. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06220-9_11
Pellestor F, Gatinois V (2020) Chromoanagenesis: a piece of the macroevolution scenario. Mole Cytogen 13(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-020-0470-0
Yancopoulos S, Attie O, Friedberg R (2005) Efficient sorting of genomic permutations by translocation inversion and block interchange. Bioinformatics 21(16):3340–3346. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti535
Funding
This work was supported by the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development, CNPq (Grant Nos. 425340/2016-3 and 202292/2020-7), the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, and the São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (Grant Nos. 2013/08293-7, 2015/11937-9 and 2019/27331-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A preliminary version has appeared in RECOMB-CG 2022, LNCS 13234, pp. 189–204, 2022 Oliveira et al. (2022).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oliveira, A.R., Alexandrino, A.O., Jean, G. et al. Approximation algorithms for sorting by k-cuts on signed permutations. J Comb Optim 45, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-022-00937-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-022-00937-z