iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9290-0
Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Review and Examination of Current and Future Trends | Journal of Business and Psychology Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Review and Examination of Current and Future Trends

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Over the last decade, religious discrimination claims have risen more rapidly compared to most other protected categories under the Civil Rights Act (CRA). The goal of this review paper is to summarize the psychological and HR practitioner-focused research on religious discrimination as it relates to the CRA to understand these religious discrimination claims. In doing so, this review also highlights what future research is needed, and what the challenges and practical implications of religious discrimination are for managers.

Design/methodology/approach

We conduct a systematic literature review of the psychology and business research on religious discrimination.

Findings

Building from the literature review and case law, we highlight four trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace: (1) legal ambiguities, (2) increased religious diversity in the American workforce, (3) increasing expression of religious beliefs, and (4) the unique nature of religion.

Implications

The trends identified in our review paper highlight the need for employers to understand and address religious discrimination issues in the workplace and the lack of empirical research in this area points to a critical gap in our understanding of workplace religious discrimination that warrants future research.

Originality/value

In addition to highlighting trends that contribute to religious discrimination in the workplace, this literature review addresses where there are gaps in the existing research that call for further research and offers practical implications for employers and organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The cases represented in their respective order are Buonanno v. AT&T Broadband LLC ( 2004 ), Anderson v. Orange County Transit Authority (1996), and a religious discrimination lawsuit filed by Carletta Sims against CitiGroup as reported in the Elizabethton Star (2004).

References

  • Allen, C., & Nielsen, J. S. (2002). Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Religious Identification Survey. (2009). ARIS 2008 Summary report. Retrieved from http://www.americanreligionsurvey-aris.org/reports/ARIS_Report_2008.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Anonymous. (2012). Supreme Court fashions ministerial exception to employment discrimination laws. Bruce R. Hopkins’ Nonprofit Counsel, 29, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson v. OCTA, Calif. Superior Ct, No. 765255 (June 17, 1996).

  • Anti-Defamation League. (2011). Religious accommodation in the workplace: Your rights and accommodations. Retrieved from http://www.adl.org/religious_freedom/resource_kit/religion_workplace.asp#f6. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Asani, A. S. (2003). So that you may know one another: A Muslim American reflects on pluralism and Islam. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Islam: Enduring myths and changing realities, 588, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C., & Haque, A. (2003). Diversity in religious practice: Implications of Islamic values in the public workplace. Public Personnel Management, 32, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balser, D. B. (2007). Predictors of workplace accommodations for employees with mobility-related disabilities. Administration and Society, 39(5), 656–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, L. G., Hebl, M., & King, E. B. (2011). Effects of manifest ethnic identification on employment discrimination. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(1), 23–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22(1), 33–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borstorff, P., & Arlington, K. (2010). The perils of religious accommodation: Employees’ perceptions. Allied academies international conference: Proceedings of the academy of legal. Ethical and regulatory issues, 14, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, B. (2011). Goldilocks and the three-judge panel: Spencer v. World Vision, Inc. and the Religious Organization Exemption of Title VII. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1, 33–48.

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brecheen, M., & Kleiner, B. H. (2000). New developments concerning religious discrimination. Equal Opportunities International, 19, 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. M., & Brito, C. (2007). Reversing claims of reverse religious discrimination. Employment Relations Today, 34, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonanno v. AT&T Broadband LLC, USDC, No. 02-MK-0778 (April 1, 2004).

  • Carter, B. G. (2010). The strengths of Muslim American couples in the face of religious discrimination following September 11 and the Iraq war. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 80, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Immigration Studies. (2002). Immigrants from the Middle East: A profile of the foreign-born population from Pakistan to Morocco. Retrieved from http://www.cis.org/articles/2002/back902.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Civil Rights Act of 1964. (1964). Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

  • Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., & Bhasim, G. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 290–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coon, L. L. (2001). Employment discrimination by religious institutions: Limiting the sanctuary of the constitutional ministerial exception to religion-based employment decisions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 54, 481–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, C. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creusere v. James Hunt Constr., 83 F. App’x 709, 711 (6th. Cir.2003).

  • Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1994). Reactions to stigma: The moderating role of justifications. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The Ontario symposium vol. 7. The psychology of prejudice (pp. 289–314). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, J. B. (1997). Cultural discrimination: The reasonable accommodation of religion in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, H. P. (2004). Ex-Disney employee sues over dress code. Sun-Sentinel, 3a.

  • Derous, E., Nguyen, H. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2009). Hiring discrimination against Arab minorities: Interactions between prejudice and job characteristics. Human Performance, 22, 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschenaux, J. (2011). Nontraditional workplace harassment lawsuits increasing. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/LegalIssues/FederalResources/Pages/Nontraditionalwww.shrm.org/LegalIssues/FederalResources/Pages/Nontraditional. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Dobson, S. (2010). Calm amidst the storm, reflection rooms provide privacy, peace and religious accommodation at work. Canadian HR Reporter, 23(17), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkhatib v. Dunkin’Donuts, Inc., No. 02 C 8131, 2004 WL 2600119 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 15, 2004).

  • EEOC. (2003). Muslim/Arab employment discrimination charges since 9/11. Retrieved November 22, 2004 from http://www.eeoc.gov/origin/z-stats.html.

  • EEOC. (2008a). Religious discrimination. Retrieved April 22, 2009 from http://www.eeoc.gov/types/religion.html.

  • EEOC. (2008b). Best practices for eradicating religious discrimination in the workplace. Retrieved March 15, 2012 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/best_practices_religion.html.

  • EEOC. (2011a). Charge statistics FY 1997 through FY 2010. Retrieved January 31, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm.

  • EEOC. (2011b). Compliance manual section 12—religious discrimination. Retrieved January 31, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/religion.html.

  • EEOC. (2011c). Abercrombie and Fitch sued for religious discrimination [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/6-27-11a.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • EEOC. (2011d). Court finds for EEOC in religious discrimination suit against Abercrombie and Fitch [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-15-11a.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • EEOC. (2011e). Taco bell owner sued by EEOC for religious discrimination [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/7-28-11.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • EEOC .(2011f). Supercuts settles EEOC religious discrimination and retaliation lawsuit [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-14-11.cfm. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • EEOC. (2011g). Questions and answers: Religious discrimination in the workplace. Retrieved October 5, 2011 from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/quanda_religion.html.

  • EEOC v. White Lodging Services, Corp. W.D. Ky., No. 3:06-CV-353 (March 31, 2010).

  • Eliezer, D., Townsend, S. S. M., Sawyer, P. J., Major, B., & Mendes, W. B. (2011). System-justifying beliefs moderate the relationship between perceived discrimination and resting blood pressure. Social Cognition, 29(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizabethton Star (2004). CitiGroup settles religious discrimination lawsuit filed by former employee. Retrieved from http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ybQOAAAAIBAJandsjid=w4IDAAAAIBAJandpg=2632%2C2145955. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Estreicher, S., & Gray, M. J. (2006). Religion and the US workplace. Human Rights, 33, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettorre, B. (1996). Religion in the workplace: Implications for managers. Management Review, 85, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997a). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S. C., & Magley, V. J. (1997b). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll. (2006). Religion. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/Religion.aspx. Accessed 17 July 2012.

  • Kern v. Dynalectron Corp., 577 F. Supp. 1196 (N.D. Tex. 1983).

  • Minkus v. Metro. Sanitary Dist., 600 F.2d 80 (7th Cir. 1979).

  • Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffari, A., & Çiftçi, A. (2010). Religiosity and self-esteem of Muslim immigrants to the United States: The moderating role of perceived discrimination. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghumman, S., & Jackson, L. (2008). Between a cross and a hard place: Religious identifiers and employability. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghumman, S., & Jackson, L. (2010). The downside of religious attire: The Muslim headscarf and expectations of obtaining employment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. J. (2008). Religion at work. HR Magazine, 53(12), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & O’Connor, M. (1995). The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Stockdale, M. S. (2005). Sex discrimination in employment. In F. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative and legal perspectives (pp. P229–P255). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., & Sin, H. (2006). What is diversity and how should it be measured? In A. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. (2007). Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1499–1511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, L. (2007). Modifying the ministerial exception: Providing ministers with a remedy for employment discrimination under Title VII while maintaining First Amendment protections of religious freedom. St. John’s Law Review, 81, 663–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, C. A., & Hogler, R. (2004). The duty of accommodations and the Workplace Religious Freedom Act of 2003: From bad policy to worse law. Labor Law Journal, 55, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2006). Moving toward a more inclusive educational environment? A multi-sample exploration of religious discrimination as seen through the eyes of students from various faith traditions. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2007a). Progressing toward inclusion? Exploring the state of religious diversity. Social Work Research, 31, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, D. R. (2007b). Religious discrimination and ethical compliance: Exploring perceptions among a professionally affiliated sample of graduate students. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 26, 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. C., & Kleiner, B. H. (2001). New developments concerning religious discrimination in the workplace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21, 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, D. F., & Inman, R. A. (2003). The workplace religious freedom act: ADA problem under a new name. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 6, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolson, M. A. (1974). Employment barriers in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 38, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. (2008). Accommodating religious expression in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., & Ahmad, A. S. (2010). An experimental field study of interpersonal discrimination toward Muslim job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 63, 881–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Shapiro, J. R., Hebl, M. R., Singletary, S. L., & Turner, S. (2006). The stigma of obesity in customer service: A mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 579–593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. E., & Williamson, I. (2005). Workplace religious expression, religiosity and job satisfaction: Clarifying a relationship. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 2, 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. (2005). Employment discrimination litigation: behavioral, quantitative and legal perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (2003). Workplace discrimination against Muslims, Arabs, and others since September 11, 2011. Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 10, 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Mills, C. (2002). Coming out of the closet: Negotiating spiritual expression in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, J. (2004, December 7). How to stop the snubs that demoralize you and your colleagues?. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1.

  • Major, B., & Kaiser, C. R. (2005). Perceiving and claiming discrimination. In L. B. Nielsen & R. L. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of research on employment discrimination: Rights and realities (pp. 279–293). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., McCoy, S. K., Kaiser, C. R., & Quinton, W. J. (2003). Prejudice and self-esteem: A transactional model. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R. K., & Swim, J. K. (2009). Making the best of a bad situation: Proactive coping with racial discrimination. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 304–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malos, S. (2010). Post-9/11 backlash in the workplace: Employer liability for discrimination against Arab- and Muslim-Americans based on religion or national origin. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 22, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. L., & Kovera, M. B. (2006). The effects of attribution of responsibility and work history on perceptions of reasonable accommodations. Law and Human Behavior, 30(6), 733–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C. D. (2007). The public identity work of evangelical Christians. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. F. (2004). How should business respond to a more religious workplace? SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. L. (2008). The influence of coworker justice perceptions on worksite accommodations and the return to work of persons with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 39(3), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes v. Kelly Services Inc., 488 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2007).

  • O’Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bates, C. A., & Lean, E. (2009). Sexual harassment at work: Moving research forward. Journal of Management, 35, 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawtuszko, M. (2009). Communication in the conditions of diversity. Kobieta i Biznes, 1–4, 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 929 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1991).

  • Rodriguez v. City of Chicago, 156 F.3d 771 (7th Cir. September 21, 1998).

  • Rudin, J. P., & Harshman, E. (2004). Keeping the faith but losing in court: Legal implications of proselytizing in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure v. Salvation Army, 460 F.2d 553, 558–60 (5th Cir. 1972).

  • Schneider, K. T., Hitlan, R. T., & Radhakrishnan, P. (2000). An examination of the nature and correlates of ethnic harassment experiences in multiple contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, R. W., & Kleiner, B. H. (1999). New developments concerning religious accommodation in the workplace. Equal Opportunities International, 18, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, J. G. (1997). Arab and Muslim stereotyping in American popular culture. Washington: Georgetown University Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHRM. (2008). Religion and corporate culture. Alexandria: Society of Human Resource Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2004). Workplace religious freedom: What is an employer’s duty to accommodate? A review of recent cases. The ALSB Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 10, 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, M. S., Berry, C. G., Schneider, R. W., & Cao, F. (2004). Perceptions of the sexual harassment of men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding. (1999). Religious bias in workplace: the Tanenbaum center’s 1999 survey of employees—executive summary. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B., & Myers, L. (2009). Religion discrimination in social work academic programs: Whither social justice? Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 28, 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C 2000e(j), 1994.

  • Townley Eng’g & Mfg. Co., 859 F.2d 610, 618 (9th Cir. 1988).

  • Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison. (1977). 432 U.S. 63.

  • Tolani v. Upper Southampton Township, 158 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Pa. 2001).

  • VNU Business Media. (2004). Taboo no more. WLNR, 1377221.

  • Von Bergen, C., & Bressler, M. (2011). A matter of conscience: do conflicting beliefs and workplace demands constitute religious discrimination? Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb v. City of Philadelphia. 562 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. April 7, 2009).

  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, D. C., & Cappel, S. D. (1992). Believing in employment discrimination: The case of Forrest Mims, scientific American, and Title VII protection. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, B. (2007). Accommodating minority religions under Title VII: How Muslims make the case for a new interpretation of section 701(J). University of Illinois Law Review, 2007, 497–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayed v. (2006). Apple computers. F.Supp.2d, WL 889571 (N.D. Cal. 2006).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Sonia Ghumman

  2. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Ann Marie Ryan

  3. School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, 48309, USA

    Lizabeth A. Barclay & Karen S. Markel

Authors
  1. Sonia Ghumman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Marie Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lizabeth A. Barclay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karen S. Markel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Ghumman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghumman, S., Ryan, A.M., Barclay, L.A. et al. Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Review and Examination of Current and Future Trends. J Bus Psychol 28, 439–454 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9290-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9290-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation