iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9229-2
Collaboration Across Professional Boundaries – The Emergence of Interpretation Drift and the Collective Creation of Project Jargon | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Skip to main content
Log in

Collaboration Across Professional Boundaries – The Emergence of Interpretation Drift and the Collective Creation of Project Jargon

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaboration among people with different knowledge backgrounds can raise complex issues. The risk of communication breakdowns increases due to the different worldviews and languages each professional brings to such a collective project. To solve this intercultural collaboration issue, previous research suggested a numbers of support systems that seek to diminish differences, understand others’ social worlds and achieve mutual understanding. However, interestingly, the cases introduced in this paper indicate that a key in such collaboration support resides in the collective creation process rather than the minimizing of differences or understanding of one another’s social world. Professionals in design often maintain different social worlds and their understanding of others within them, even though they collaborate for a collective concern. In this paper, by introducing and analyzing two empirical collaborative design cases, we address the interpretation drift of common terms as an unavoidable integral aspect of the design process, and the ongoing collective creation of local languages or project jargon during the collaboration period as facilitators to enable collaborators to work beyond interpretation drift and breakdowns. By referring to our cases, we show that communicative difficulties diminish but do not entirely disappear, and continuous drift in interpretations and breakdowns are observed. At the same time, in such a process, collectively created and maintained project jargon contributes largely to facilitate professionals with different knowledge backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To be precise, Lee investigates the creation process of boundary objects as objects comprised of the iterative use of interwoven sets of boundary negotiation practices and boundary negotiating artifacts. As such, she focused on negotiation in her study.

References

  • Andersen, Peter Bøgh (1990). A Theory of Computer Semiotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Austin, John. Langshaw (1975). How to Do Things With Words. Harvard University Press.

  • Bjørn, Penille and Kjetil Rødje (2008). Triage Drift: A Workplace Study in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, vol.17, pp. 395–419.

  • Bødker, Keld. and Pedersen, Jesper Strandgaard (1991). Workplace Cultures: Looking at Artefacts, Symbols and Practices. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Patrick, Ashtosh Kapuskar, Sarah Reitmeier and Lynn Wilcox (1999). Notelook: Taking Notes in Meetings with Digital Video and Ink. In MULTIMEDIA '99: Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia, Part1, New York: ACM Press, pp. 149–158.

  • Clark, Herbert (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Clark, Herbert and Susan E. Brennan (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, Lauren B., John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley (eds): Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association (APA), pp. 127–149

  • de Souza, Clarisse Siechkenius (2004). The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

  • Dourish, Paul and Victoria Bellotti (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In CSCW '92: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1992. New York: ACM Press, pp. 107–114.

  • Ellis, Clarence A., Simon J. Gibbs, and Gail Rein (1991). Groupware: some issues and experiences. Communication of the ACM, vol.34, no.1, January 1991, pp. 39–58.

  • Fischer, Gerhard (2000). Symmetry of ignorance, socially creativity and meta-design. KBS: Knowledge-Based Systems Journal, vol.13, no. 7–8, 2000. pp. 527–537.

  • Fischer, Gerhard (2004). Social creativity: Turning barriers into opportunities for collaboration design. In PDC '04: Participatory Design Conference 2004, pp. 152–161.

  • Fish, Robert S., Robert E. Kraut, and Barbara L. Chalfonte (1990). The VideoWindow system in informal communication. In CSCW’90. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1990. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–11.

  • Friedman, Thomas (2005). The World Is Flat - A Brief History of the Twenty first Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Elihu M. and Susan L. Star (1986). Analyzing due process in the workplace. In COCS '86: Proceedings of the third ACM-SIGOIS conference on Office information systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 70–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Raymond L. (1958). Roles in Sociological Field Observations. Social Forces, vol.36, no.3, pp. 217–223.

  • Greenbaum, Joan. and Morten Kyng (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C., Valerie, J. Caracelli and Wendy F Graham (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol.11, no.3, 21 September 1989, pp. 255–274.

  • Heath, Christian, Paul Luff and Abigail Sellen (1995). Reconsidering the Virtual Workplace: Flexible Support for Collaborative Activity. In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad and K. Schmidt (eds): ECSCW’95: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–14 September, 1995. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 83–99.

  • Isaacs, Ellen A., Trevor Morris and Thomas K. Rodriguez (1994). A forum for supporting interactive presentations to distributed audiences. In CSCW '94: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 405–416.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida, Toru (2002). Digital City Kyoto: Social information infrastructure for everyday life. Communications of the ACM, vol.45, no.7, pp. 76–81.

  • Ishida, Toru, Alessandro Aurigi and Mika Yasuoka (2004). World Digital Cities: Beyond Heterogeneity, In P. van den Besselaar and S. Koizumi (eds.) Digital Cities III, Information Technologies for Social Capital a Cross-Cultural Perspective, no.3081 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag. pp. 188–203.

  • Ishii, Hiroshi (1990). Team workstation: Towards a seamless shared workspace. In CSCW '90: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 13–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Hiroshi and Naomi Miyake (1991). Toward an open shared workspace: computer and video fusion approach of TeamWorkStation. Commununication of the ACM, vol.34, no.12, December 1991, pp. 37–50.

  • Johansen, Robert (1988). Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Charlotte P. (2007). Boundary negotiating arifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. In CSCW’07. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York: ACM Press, pp. 307–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Charlotte P. (2005). Between chaos and routine: Boundary negotiating artifacts in collaboration. In ECSCW '05: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 387–406.

  • McGuffin, Lola and Gary M. Olson (1992). Shredit: A shared electronic workspace. Technical report, University of Michigan.

  • Nakakoji, Kumiyo (2006). Supporting Software Development as Collective Creative Knowledge Work. In KCSE 2006. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Supporting Knowledge Collaboration in Software Development, NII, Tokyo, Japan, September, 2006. pp. 1–8.

  • Nakakoji, Kumiyo., Kazuaki Yamada. and Mika Yasuoka (2004). Toward understanding the process of mutual understanding among cross-community collaboration. In Proceedings of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society 2004, pp. 50–51.

  • Nardi, B., S. Whittaker, and E. Bradner (2000): Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In CSCW '00: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, pp. 79–88.

  • Nardi, Bonnie A., Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In CSCW '00. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohira, Masao (2001). Evidii: An environment to help externalizing implicit ideas through visualizing individual associations. In M. Hirose (ed): Proceedings of the IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Tokyo, Japan, 2001, pp. 648–650.

  • Okamoto, Masayuki, Hideyuki Nakanishi, Toshikazu Nishimura and Toru Ishida (1998). Silhouettell: Awareness Support for Real-World Encounter, Community Computing and Support Systems, LINCS 1519, pp. 316–329.

  • Okazaki, Naoaki and Yukio Ohsawa (2003). Polaris: An integrated data miner for chance discovery. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Chance Discovery and Its Management in conjunction with HCI 2003. International Human Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 27–30.

  • Ostwald, Johathan (1996). Knowledge Construction in Software Development: The Evolving Artefact Approach. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder.

  • Page, Scotto E. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press.

  • PARC (2002). Popout prism. http://www2.parc.com/csl/projects/popoutprism/.

  • Pedersen, E. R., K. McCall, T. P. Moran, and F. G. Halasz (1993). Tivoli: An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In The Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI’93), pp. 391–398.

  • Pedersen, Elin Rønby, Kim McCall, Thomas P. Moran and Frank G. Halasz (1993). Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 391–398.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, Horst. J. and Melvin M. Webber (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems, In Cross, N. (ed), Developments in Design Methodology, Wiley Publishing, pp. 135–144.

  • Rönkkö Kari, Mats Hellman, Britta Kilander, and Yvonne Dittrich (2004). Personas is not applicable: local remedies interpreted in a wider context. In PDC '04. Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Vol. 1. New York: ACM Press, pp. 112–120.

  • Sale, Joanna E. M., Lynne H. Lohfeld and Kevin Brazil (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Qualiy and Quantity, vol.36, no.1, February 2002, pp. 43–53.

  • Sawyer, Keith (2007): Group Genius. Basic Books.

  • Schmidt, Kjeld and Carla Simone (1996). Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol.5, no.2–3, 1996, pp. 155–200.

  • Schmidt, Kjeld and Ina Wagner (2004). Ordering systems: Coordinative practices and artifacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol.13, pp. 349–408.

  • Searle, John. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.

  • Searle, John. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.

  • Sellen, Abigail J. (1992): Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI92. ACM, pp. 49–59.

  • Sellen, Abigail J. (1992). Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations. In P. Bauersfeld, J. Bennett, and G. Lynch (eds): CHI '92. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 49–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude (1948): A mathmatical theory of communication. Technical Report 27, Bell System Tech. 379–423, pp. 623–656.

  • Shum, S. Buckingham (1997). Representing hard-to-formalise, contextualised, multidisciplinary, organisational knowledge. In AIKM’97. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management. AAAI Press, pp. 134–141.

  • Simon, Herbert (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles Percy (1993). The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh (2010), This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values. vol.35, no.5, pp. 601–617.

  • Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations,’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939, Social Studies of Science, August 1989, vol.19, no. 3, pp. 387–420.

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, vol.29, pp. 163–178.

  • Strauss, Anselm. L. (1985). Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly, vol.26, no.1, pp. 1–19.

  • Watanabe, Akiko (2001). Cybered Space Design. Keio University Press.

  • Wenger, Etienne (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Winograd, Terry. and Flores, Fernando (1986). Understanding Computer and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 5th edition.

  • Yasuoka, Mika (2006). Collaboration support in the initial collaboration phase. In PDC’06. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2006, vol.2, pp. 129–132.

  • Yasuoka, Mika (2007). Using CAD systems as boundary object to facilitate collaborative work processes in architectural design. In the International Conference of Managing the Construction of Building, pp. 1–26.

  • Yasuoka, Mika, Kumiyo Nakakoji and Kazuaki Yamada (2004). Analysis of Shared Understanding observed in the collaborative work among community of interests, In the 66th National Convention of JPSJ, vol.2004, h4 5B-6, pp. 117–118.

  • Yasuoka, Mika. (2010). Bridging and breakdowns, PhD thesis, Design of Organizational IT, IT University of Copenhagen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mika Yasuoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasuoka, M. Collaboration Across Professional Boundaries – The Emergence of Interpretation Drift and the Collective Creation of Project Jargon. Comput Supported Coop Work 24, 253–276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9229-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9229-2

Keywords

Navigation