iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0465-9
Eye movements and bisection behavior in spatial neglect syndrome: representational biases induced by the segment length and spatial dislocation of the stimulus | Cognitive Processing Skip to main content
Log in

Eye movements and bisection behavior in spatial neglect syndrome: representational biases induced by the segment length and spatial dislocation of the stimulus

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study explored behavioral and eye-movement measures in unilateral neglect patients in response to online bisection task (unfilled gap line). Two different tasks supported the bisection performance, a pointing and a grasping strategy. It was explored whether these different strategies may influence subjects’ behavioral and eye-movement measures in response to different segment features: segment length (from shorter to longer) and segment spatial dislocation (from right to left spatial location). Consistent spatial biases were found for both bisection responses, fixation count, and duration, as well as for the first fixation count in case of pointing task. An “extreme-left” gradient effect was suggested and discussed, with patients’ behavioral and eye measures more impaired. On the contrary, the patients’ performance overlaps with the controls’ one in case a grasping task. The direct link of visual pointing and grasping strategy, respectively, with the two cortical ventral and dorsal pathways was adduced to explain our results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bisiach E, Vallar G (1988) Hemineglect in humans. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 195–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard E, Parton A, Husain M (2006) Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 44:2717–2733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RD, McClements KI, Dijkerman HC, Milner AD (2004) “Mind the gap”: the size-distance dissociation in visual neglect is a cueing effect. Cortex 40:339–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stigchel S, Nijboer TC (2010) The imbalance of oculomotor capture in unilateral visual neglect. Conscious Cogn 19:186–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Balconi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balconi, M., Sozzi, M., Ferrari, C. et al. Eye movements and bisection behavior in spatial neglect syndrome: representational biases induced by the segment length and spatial dislocation of the stimulus. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 89–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0465-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0465-9

Keywords

Navigation