iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-011-0380-x
Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a rule-based approach | Knowledge and Information Systems Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a rule-based approach

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research reported in this paper addresses the problem of energy conservation in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). It proposes concepts and techniques to extract environmental information that are useful for controlling sensor operations, in order to enable sensor nodes to conserve their energy, and consequently prolong the network lifetime. These concepts and techniques are consolidated in a generic framework we term CASE: Context Awareness in Sensing Environments framework. CASE targets energy conservation at the network level. A subset framework of CASE, we term CASE Compact, targets energy conservation at the sensor node level. In this paper, we elaborate on these two frameworks, elucidate the requirements for them to operate together within a WSN and evaluate the applications they can be applied to for energy conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal R, Srikant R (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: 20th International conference on very large data bases. Chile, pp 487–499

  2. Apiletti D, Baralis E, Cerquitelli T (2010) Energy-saving models for wireless sensor networks. Knowl Inf Syst. doi:10.1007/s10115-010-0328-6

  3. Arici T, Gedik B, Altunbasak Y, Liu L (2003) Pinco: a pipelined in-network compression scheme for data collection in wireless sensor networks. In: 12th International conference on computer communications and networks. Texas, pp 539–544

  4. Baker CR, Armijo K, Belka S, Benhabib M, Bhargava V, Burkhart N, Minassians AD, Dervisoglu G, Gutnik L, Haick MB, Ho C, Koplow M, Mangold J, Robinson S, Rosa M, Schwartz M, Sims C, Stoffregen H, Waterbury A, Leland ES, Pering T, Wright PK (2007). Wireless sensor networks for home health care. In: 21st Advanced information networking and applications workshops. Niagara Falls, pp 832–837

  5. UC Berkeley (2003) Serial-line communication in tinyos-1.1. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-1.x/doc/serialcomm/description.html (Accessed 3/9/2008)

  6. Burrell J, Brooke T, Beckwith R (2004) Vineyard computing: sensor networks in agricultural production. IEEE Perv Comput 3(1): 38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JY, Pandurangan G, Xu D (2005) Robust computation of aggregates in wireless sensor networks: distributed randomized algorithms and analysis. In: 4th International symposium on information processing in sensor networks. California, pp 348–355

  8. Chong SK, Gaber MM, Krishnaswamy S, Loke SW (2008) A rule learning approach to energy efficient clustering in wireless sensor networks. In: 2nd International conference on sensor technologies and applications. Cap Esterel, pp 329–334

  9. Chong SK, Krishnaswamy S, Loke SW (2005) A context-aware approach to conserving energy in wireless sensor networks. In: 3rd IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops. Hawaii, pp 401–405

  10. Chu D, Deshpande A, Hellerstein JM, Hong W (2006) Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models. In: 22nd International conference on data engineering. Atlanta, pp 48

  11. Dalton AB, Ellis CS (2003) Sensing user intention and context for energy management. In: 9th Workshop on hot topics in operating Systems. USENIX, Hawaii, pp 151–156

  12. Deshpande A, Guestrin C, Madden SR, Hellerstein JM, Hong W (2004) Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In: 30th Very large data base conference. Toronto, pp 588–599

  13. Elnahrawy E, Nath B (2004). Context-aware sensors. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, 2920, pp 27–93

  14. Gedik B, Liu L, Yu PS (2007) Asap: an adaptive sampling approach to data collection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 18(12): 1766–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He T, Krishnamurthy S, Stankovic JA, Abdelzaher T, Luo L, Stoleru R, Yan T, Gu L, Hui J, Krogh B (2004) Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks. In: 2nd International conference on mobile systems, applications and services. Boston, pp 270–283

  16. Hefeeda M, Bagheri M (2007) Wireless sensor networks for early detection of forest fires. In: IEEE International conference on mobile adhoc and sensor systems. Pisa, pp 1–6

  17. Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: 33rd Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Maui, pp 2–12

  18. Hill J, Szewczyk R, Woo A, Hollar S, Culler D, Pister K (2000) System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: 9th International conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems. New York, pp 93–104

  19. Krishnamachari B, Estrin D, Wicker S (2002) The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In: 22nd International conference on distributed computing systems workshops. Vienna, pp 575–578

  20. Liu H, Lin Y, Han J (2011) Methods for mining frequent items in data streams: an overview. Knowl Inf Syst 26:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loo KK, Tong I, Kao B, Cheung D (2005) Online algorithms for mining inter-stream associations from large sensor networks. In: Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. Hanoi, pp 143–149

  22. Madden S, Franklin MJ (2002) Fjording the stream: an architecture for queries over streaming sensor data. In: 18th International conference on data engineering. San Jose, pp 555–566

  23. Manjhi A, Nath S, Gibbons PB (2005) Tributaries and deltas: efficient and robust aggregation in sensor network stream. In: Special interest group on management of data. Baltimore, pp 287–298

  24. McCauley I, Matthews B, Nugent L, Mather A, Simons J (2005) Wired pigs: Ad-hoc wireless sensor networks in studies of animal welfare. In: 2nd IEEE workshop on embedded networked sensors. Sydney, pp 29–36

  25. Nath S, Gibbons PB, Seshan S, Anderson ZR (2004) Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks. In: ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. Baltimore, pp 250–262

  26. Passos RM, Nacif JA, Mini RAF, Loureiro AAF, Fernandes AO, Coelho CN (2006) System-level dynamic power management techniques for communication intensive devices. In: International conference on very large scale integration. Nice, pp 373–378

  27. Perillo M, Ignjatovic Z, Heinzelman W (2004) An energy conservation method for wireless sensor networks employing a blue noise spatial sampling. In: International symposium on information processing in sensor networks. California, pp 116–123

  28. Petrovic D, Shah RC, Ramchandran K, Rabaey J (2003) Data funneling: routing with aggregation and compression for wireless sensor networks. In: 1st IEEE international workshop on sensor network protocols and applications. California, pp 156–162

  29. Qin B, Xia Y, Prabhakar S (2010) Rule induction for uncertain data. Knowl Inf Syst. doi:10.1007/s10115-010-0335-7

  30. Shah RC, Roy S, Jain S, Brunette W (2003) Data mules: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. In: 1st IEEE international workshop on sensor network protocols and applications. Seattle, pp 30–41

  31. Shnayder V, Hempstead H, Chen B, Allen GW, Welsh M (2004) Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications. In: 2nd International conference on embedded networked sensor systems. Baltimore, pp 188–200

  32. Tavakoli A, Zhang J, San SH (2005) Group-based event detection in undersea sensor networks. In: 2nd International workshop on networked sensing systems. San Diego. http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/arsalan/Papers/GroupDetection_INSS.pdf (Accessed 10/11/08)

  33. Tian D, Georganas ND (2002) A node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput J 3(2): 271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tulone D, Madden S (2006) Paq: time series forecasting for approximate query answering in sensor networks. In: 3rd European conference on wireless sensor networks. Zurich, pp 21–37

  35. Vasilescu I, Kotay K, Rus D, Dunbabin M, Corke P (2005) Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. In: 3rd International conference on embedded networked sensor systems. California, pp 154–165

  36. Widom J, Ceri S (1996) Active Database Systems: triggers and rules for advanced database processing. Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN: 1558603042

  37. Ye F, Zhong G, Cheng J, Lu S, Zhang L (2003) Peas: a robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In: 23rd International conference on distributed computing systems. Providence, pp 28–37

  38. Younis O (2005) iheed source code. http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/fahmy/software/iheed/tinyos-1.x/ (Accessed 03/11/2007), 2005

  39. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) Heed: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 3(4): 366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao J, Govindan R, Estrin D (2003) Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In: 1st IEEE international workshop on sensor network protocols and applications. California, pp 139–148

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Distributed Systems and Software Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Suan Khai Chong & Shonali Krishnaswamy

  2. School of Computing, University of Portmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    Mohamed Medhat Gaber

  3. Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, Latrobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Seng Wai Loke

  4. Centrelink IT, Brisbane, Australia

    Suan Khai Chong

Authors
  1. Suan Khai Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Medhat Gaber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shonali Krishnaswamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seng Wai Loke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suan Khai Chong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chong, S.K., Gaber, M.M., Krishnaswamy, S. et al. Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a rule-based approach. Knowl Inf Syst 28, 579–614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-011-0380-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-011-0380-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation