iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0067-5
Is there a need for a mesh plug in inguinal hernia repair? Randomized, prospective study of the use of Hertra 1 mesh compared to PerFix Plug | Hernia Skip to main content
Log in

Is there a need for a mesh plug in inguinal hernia repair? Randomized, prospective study of the use of Hertra 1 mesh compared to PerFix Plug

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the mesh plug procedure is an effective operation, sutureless implantation of a single onlay mesh, if successful, would avoid the risks of plug-related complications. One hundred patients with primary inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo PerFix Plug or Hertra 1 implantation. Mean duration of the operation was similar, 38 versus 35 min for plug and onlay mesh implantation, respectively (nonsignificant, NS). The level of postoperative pain and early complication rate was similarly low in both groups (NS). Recurrence rate was the same—2 patients in each group (4%)—all following large hernia repair. The level of long-term discomfort was low after each type of operation (NS). Implantation of the onlay mesh—Hertra 1 as compared to the use of PerFix Plug is simple, safe, and equally effective in small and medium inguinal hernia repair, suggesting that a plug device is not necessary for successful hernia surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hernia 6:130–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephenson BM (2003) Complication of open groin hernia repairs. Surg Clin N Am 83:1255–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberod A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg 163:823–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A. (2003) The Millican modified mesh-plug hernioplasty. Arch Surg 138:525–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutkow IM (2003) The PerFix plug repair groin hernia. Surg Clin N Am 83:1079–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuback JA, Singh RS, Sills C, Dick LS (2000) Small bowel obstruction resulting from mesh plug migration after open inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 127:475–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dieter RA Jr (1999) Mesh plug migration in scrotum. Int Surg 84:57–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelissier EP, Blum D, Damas JM, Marre P. (1999) The plug method in inguinal hernia: a prospective evaluation. Hernia 4:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palot JP, Avisse C, Calliez-Tomasi JP, Greffier D FlamentJB (1998) The mesh plug repair of groin hernias: a three year experience. Hernia 2:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amid PK, Lichteinstein IL. (1998) Long-term result and current status of Lichteinstein open tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 2:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amid PK (1999) Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Blanc KA (2001) Complication associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorhaphy. Hernia 5:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Trabucco EE, Trabucco AF (2002) Tension-free sutureless preshaped mesh hernioplasty. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG (eds) Nyhus and Condons hernia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trabucco EE, Trabucco AF. (1998) Flat plug and mesh hernioplasty in the “inguinal box”: description of the surgical technique. Hernia 2:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zollinger Jr RM (2003) Classification system for groin hernias. Surg Clin N Am 83:1053–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A. (2001) A prospective study of the Mesh-plug Hernioplasty. Am Surg 67:285–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Callesen T, Bech K, Nielsen R, Andersen J, Hesselfeldt P, Roikjaer O, Kehlet H. (1998) Pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 85:1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mann DV, Prout J, Havranek E, Gould S, Darzi A. (1998) Late- onset deep prosthetic infection following mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 176:12–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Witkowski P, Pirski MI, Adamonis W, Śmietański M, Drączkowski T, Śledziński Z (2000) Mesh plug versus Bassini operation. Randomized prospective study. Hernia 4:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kux M., Fuchsjager N, Schemper M (1994) Shouldice is superior to Bassini inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 168:15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Millican KW, Diezel DJ. (1996) The management of hernia. Considerations in cost effectiveness. Surg Clin N Am 76:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83:1563–1566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rutkow IM. (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83:1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trabucco E, Campanelli P, Cavagnoli R. (1998) New polypropylene hernia prosthesis. Minerva Chir 53(4):337–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Testini M, Miniello S, Piccinni G, Di Venere B, Lissidini G, Greco L, Bonomo GM (2002) Trabucco versus Rutkow versus Lichtenstein techniques in the treatment of groin hernia. A controlled randomized clinical trial. Minerva Chir 57:371–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shin D, Lipshultz LI, Goldstein M, Barme GA, Fuchs EF, Nagler HM, McCallum SW, Niederberger CS, Schoor RA, Brugh VM 3rd, Honig SC (2005) Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg 241(4):553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our appreciation to Professor Mark A. Hardy, M.D., Ermanno E. Trabucco, M.D. and Eric Liu, M.D. for their review of the manuscript and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Witkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adamonis, W., Witkowski, P., Śmietański, M. et al. Is there a need for a mesh plug in inguinal hernia repair? Randomized, prospective study of the use of Hertra 1 mesh compared to PerFix Plug. Hernia 10, 223–228 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0067-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0067-5

Keywords

Navigation