Abstract
The manifold activities in Southeast Asian countries for establishing World-Class Universities are observed since several years. In contrast, the substantial efforts in Arabian countries are barely noticed. As illustrative example, the King Abdulaziz University has enormously increased the quantity and quality of its research reflected in a growing number of articles and rising citation scores. This development implies a steadily improving position in rankings such as the Shanghai Ranking, but the investment is not unilaterally focussed on research, but education profited as well. The amelioration in science is substantially based on new academic staff from foreign countries experienced in high level research, but the number of nationals, male and female, significantly rose as well. The investment in research and education has to be considered as starting point of a long-term strategy of economic development for coping with the foreseeable end of the oil boom.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See e.g. Douglass (2016).
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Saudi_Arabia and Alshahrani and Alsadiq (2014).
Primarily the Web of Science and Scopus.
Data from http://www.shanghairanking.com/World-University-Rankings/King-Abdulaziz-University.html (update of May 15, 2015).
npj = Nature partner journal.
http://fer-che.kau.edu.sa/Pages-erenewable.aspx, see also Al-Saleh (2009) and Whitley and Makhijan (2014).
The size of Taiwan is comparable to that of Saudi Arabia (Taiwan: Population in 2015 23 million, Saudia Arabia: 31 million inhabitants).
References
Al-Saleh, Y. (2009). Renewable energy scenarios for major oil-producing nations: The case of Saudi Arabia. Futures, 41(9), 650–662.
Alshahrani, S. A., & Alsadiq, A. J. (2014). Economic growth and government spending in Saudi Arabia—An empirical investigation. IMF working paper WP/14/. Washington D. C.: International Monetary Fund.
Alshayea, A. (2013). Scientific research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Potential for excellence and indicators of underdevelopment. Higher Education Studies, 3(5), 47–51.
Chang, D. (2013). The challenges for establishing World-Class Universities in Taiwan. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 185–201). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.
Dill, D. D., & van Vught, F. (2010). National innovation and the academic research enterprise: Public policy in global perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Douglass, J. A. (2016). The new Flagship University: Changing the paradigm from global ranking to national relevancy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Economic Policy Institute (EPI). (2015). US lags Behind China, Japan, and Germany in export performance. Washington: EPI.
Florian, R. V. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities’. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32.
Göransson, B., & Brundenius, C. (Eds.). (2011). Universities in transition: The changing role and challenges for academic institutions. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer.
Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: Multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.
Hammoudeh, S., & Aleisa, E. (2004). Dynamic relationships among GCC stock markets and nymex oil futures. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(2), 250–269.
Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The impact of league tables and ranking. Systems on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 1–12.
Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Measuring world-class excellence and the global obsession with rankings. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 497–515). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. London, New York, Shanghai: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In W. Glänzel, H. Moed, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on R&D systems (pp. 437–496). Dordrecht, Norwell, New York, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kehm, B. M. (2014). Global university rankings—Impacts and unintended side effects. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 102–112.
Kojima, K. (2000). The “flying geese” model of Asian economic development: Origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 11(4), 375–401.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.
Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329.
Merton, R. K. (1973) [1942]. The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ministry of Higher Education (MHE), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2010). Ministry of Higher Education’s plan to achieve excellence in science and technology. Riyadh: MHE.
Niederl, A., Bonnacorsi, A., Lepori, B., Brandt, T., De Fillipo, D., Lepori, B., Schmoch, U., Schubert, T., Slipersaeter, S. (2014). Mapping the European higher education landscape: new insights from the EUMIDA project. In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), Knowledge, diversity and performance in European higher education, a changing landscape (pp. 13–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nielsen, L. (2011). Classifications of countries based on their level of development: How it is done and how it could be done, IMF Working Paper No. 11/31, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Romani, V. (2009). The politics of higher education in the Middle East: Problems and prospects. Middle East Brief No. 36. Waltham: Brandeis University.
Schmoch, U. (2015). The informative value of international university rankings—Some methodological remarks. In I. M. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and performance. governance of research organizations (pp. 141–154). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2009a). Sustainability of incentives for excellent research—The German case. Scientometrics, 81(1), 195–218.
Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2009b). When and how to use bibliometrics as a screening tool for research performance. Science and Public Policy, 36(10), 753–762.
Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (Eds.). (2013a). Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (2013b). The world-class university in different systems and contexts. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Shin, J. C., & Kehm, B. M. (2013c). The world-class university across higher education systems: Similarities, differences, and challenges. In J. C. Shin & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 275–286). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Soh, K. C. (2011). Don’t read university rankings like reading football league tables: Taking a close look at the indicators. Higher Education Review, 44(1), 15–29.
Teichler, U. (2011). Social contexts and systemic consequences of university rankings: A meta-analysis of the ranking literature. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University Rankings. Theoretical basis, methodology and impact on global higher education (pp. 55–69). Dordrecht, Heidel-berg, London, New York: Springer.
UNEP Global Environmental Alert Service (GEAS). (2014). Sand, rarer than one thinks. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.
Whitley, S., & Makhijan, S. (2014). Fossil fuel exploration subsidies: Saudi Arabia. Washingthon: Oil Change International (OCI).
Acknowledgments
Certain data included in this chapter are derived from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), the Social Science Citation Index SSCI), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), the Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP), and the Index to Social Sciences and Humanities Proceedings (ISSHP) (all updated June 2015) prepared by Thomson Reuters (Scientific) Inc.®, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, USA: © Copyright Thomson Reuters Scientific 2015. All rights reserved.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmoch, U., Fardoun, H.M. & Mashat, A.S. Establishing a World-Class University in Saudi Arabia: intended and unintended effects. Scientometrics 109, 1191–1207 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2089-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2089-9