iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027332
Detecting traffic problems with ILP | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Detecting traffic problems with ILP

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1446))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Expert systems for decision support have recently been suc- cessfully introduced in road transport management. These systems include knowledge on traffic problem detection and alleviation. The paper describes experiments in automated acquisition of knowledge on traffic problem detection. The task is to detect road sections where a problem has occured (critical sections) from sensor data. It is necessary to use inductive logic programming (ILP) for this purpose as relational back- ground knowledge on the road network is essential. In this paper, we apply three state-of-the art ILP systems to learn how to detect traffic problems and compare their performance to the performance of a propositional learning system on the same problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barcelo, J., Ferrer J.L., and Montero, L. (1989). AIMSUN: Advanced Interactive Microscopic Simulator for Urban Networks. Vol I: System Description, and Vol II: User's Manual. Departamento de Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa, Facultad de Informatica, Universidad Politecnica de Cataluna, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blockeel, H., and De Raedt, L. (1997). Lookahead and discretization in ILP. In Proc. 7th Intl. Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, pages 77–84, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, P. and Boswell, R. (1991). Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In Proc. Fifth European Working Session on Learning, pages 151–163. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuena, J., Ambrosino, G., and Boero M. (1992). A general knowledge-based architecture for traffic control: The KITS approach. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Transportation Engineering. San Buenaventura, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuena, J., Hernandez, J., and Molina, M. (1995). Knowledge-based models for adaptive traffic management systems. Transportation Research: Part C, 3(5): 311–337.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Raedt, L. (1997). Logical settings for learning. Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Raedt, L., and Dehaspe, L. (1997). Clausal discovery. Machine Learning, 26: 99–146.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Raedt, L., and Van Laer, V. (1995). Inductive constraint logic. Proc. Sixth International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pp. 80–94. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deeter, D.L., and Ritchie, S.G. (1993). A prototype real-time expert system for surface street traffic management and control. In Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Džeroski, S., Jacobs, N., Molina, M., Moure, C. (1998). ILP experiments in detecting traffic problems. In Proc. Eleventh European Conference on Machine Learning. Springer, Berlin. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muggleton, S. (1992). Inverse entailment and PROGOL. New Generation Computing 13:245–286.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quinlan, J.R. (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts, S., Van Laer, W., Jacobs, N., Muggleton, S., Broughton, J. (1998) A comparison of ILP and popositional systems on propositional traffic data. In Proc. Eighth International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming. Springer, Berlin. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Page

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Džeroski, S., Jacobs, N., Molina, M., Moure, C., Muggleton, S., Van Laer, W. (1998). Detecting traffic problems with ILP. In: Page, D. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1446. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027332

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027332

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64738-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69059-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics