Abstract
The article argues that cognitive linguistic theory may prove an alternative to the Montague paradigm for designing natural language understanding systems. Within this framework it describes a system which models language understanding as a dialogical process between user and computer. The system operates with natural language texts as input and represent language meaning as entity-relationship diagrams.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Allen, J. (1987).Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin/Cumming. CA.
Lakoff, G. (1987).Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
Langacker, R. W. (1987).Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Volume 1. Stanford University Press. CA.
Lytje, I. (1989). A humanistic approach to systems development.Office: Technology and People,4. 147–155.
Naur, P. (1985). Programming as Theory Building.Microprocessing and Microprogramming,15, 253–261.
Palmer, R. E. (1969).Hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press.
Ruus, H. and Maegaard, B. (1986).Hyppige ord i danske aviser, ugeblade & fagblade bind 2. Gyldendal. Kbhv.
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977).Scripts Plans Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum. New Jersey.
Searle, J. R. (1979).Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press. NY.
Winograd, T. (1983).Language as a Cognitive Process. Addison-Wesley. CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lytje, I. Natural language understanding within a cognitive semantics framework. AI & Soc 4, 276–290 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894032