iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7831-7_3
The Concept of Responsibility in Medicine | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The Concept of Responsibility in Medicine

  • Chapter
Responsibility in Health Care

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((volume 12))

Abstract

Achieving agreement in medical ethics is particularly difficult in light of the confusion surrounding the identification of what constitutes medical ethics.1 Alasdair Maclntyre contends that this difficulty is but a characteristic of our broader culture, which has no systematic way of using such words as “ethical” and “moral” that does not already embody a particular and contentious morality ([20], p. 3). As a consequence, the conflict over how morality is to be defined is itself a moral conflict. Different and rival definitions cannot be defended apart from defending different and rival sets of moral principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Ackerman, T.: 1980, ‘What Bioethics Should Be’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 260–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agich, G. J.: 1981, ‘The Foundation of Medical Ethics’, Metamedicine 2, 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agich, G. J.: 1981, ‘Professionalism and Ethics in Health Care’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5, 186–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin, M. and Curtis, J.: 1981, Ethics in Nursing, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Churchill, L.: 1980, ‘Bioethical Reductionism and Our Sense of the Human’, Man and Medicine 5, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Downie, R. S.: 1971, Roles and Values: An Introduction to Social Ethics, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhardt, H. T., Jr.: 1980, ‘Doctoring the Disease, Treating the Complaint, Helping the Patient, Some of the Works of Hygeia and Panacea’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr., and D. Callahan (eds.), Knowing and Valuing: The Search for Common Roots, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, Hastings-on-Hudson, pp. 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feinberg, J.: 1970, Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  9. French, P.: 1979, ‘The Corporation as a Moral Agent’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 207–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goffman, E.: 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goffman, E.: 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hart, H. L. A.: 1973, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haydon, G.: 1978, ‘On Being Responsible’, Philosophical Quarterly 28, 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmaster, B.: 1978, ‘Comments on “Legalism and Medical Ethics”’, in J. W. Davis, et al. (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Ethics, Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey, pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hunt, R. and J. Arras: 1977, ‘Ethical Theory in the Medical Context’, in R. Hunt and J. Arras (eds.), Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, Mayfield Publishing Company, Palo Alto, California, pp. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kant, I.: 1913, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Paul Natorp (ed. ), Königliche preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ladd, J.: 1975, ‘The Ethics of Participation’, in J. R. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds.), Participation in Politics, Nomos XVI, Lieber-Athernton, New York, pp. 98–125.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ladd, J.: 1978, ‘Legalism and Medical Ethics’, in J. W. Davis, et al. (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Ethics, Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ladd, J.: 1975, ‘Policy Studies and Ethics’, in S. Nagel (ed.), Policy Studiesand the Social Sciences, Lexington Books, Lexington, Kentucky, pp. 177–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacIntyre, A.: 1978, ‘How to Identify Ethical Principles’, The Belmont Report Appendix, Volume I, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, DHEW Publication No. ( OS ) 78–0013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Newton, L.: 1979, ‘A Framework for Responsible Medicine’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newton, L.: 1978, ‘Hippocrates Lost, A Professional Ethics Regained: Reflections of the Death of the Hippocratic Tradition’, in J. W. Davis, et al. (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Biomedical Ethics, Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey, pp. 140–60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C.: 1981, A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pellegrino, E. D.: 1979, ‘Towards a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of Illness’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4, 32–56.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pennock, J. R.: 1960, ‘The Problem of Responsibility’, in C. J. Friedrich (ed.), Responsibility, Nomos III, Liberal Arts Press, New York, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Risser, D. T.: 1978, ‘Power and Collective Responsibility’, Kinesis 9, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schutz, A.: 1971, ‘Making Music Together’, in A. Brodersen (ed.), Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 159–78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schutz, A.: 1971, The Stranger’, in A. Brodersen (ed.), Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silber, J.: 1967, ‘Being and Doing: A Study of Status Responsibility and Voluntary Responsibility’, in J. M. Edie (ed.), Phenomenology in America: Studies in the Philosophy of Experience, Quadrangle Books, Chicago, pp. 197–254.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Spicker, S. F. and H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. (eds.): 1977, Philosophical Medical Ethics: Its Nature and Significance, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, Boston, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thomasma, D. C. and Pellegrino, E. D.: 1981, ‘Philosophy of Medicine as the Source of Medical Ethics’, Metamedicine 2, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Toulmin, S.: 1977, ‘The Meaning of Professionalism: Doctors’ Ethics and Biomedical Science’, in H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. and D. Callahan (eds.), Knowledge, Value and Belief, Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, Hastings-on-Hudson, pp. 254–278.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Toulmin, S.: 1976, ‘On the Nature of the Physician’s Understanding’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1, 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Twiss, S. B.: 1977, ‘The Problem of Moral Responsibility in Medicine’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2, 330–75.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Waddington, I.: 1975, ‘The Development of Medical Ethics - A Sociological Analysis’, Medical History 19, 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zaner, R. M.: ‘Chance and Morality: The Dialysis Phenomenon’, in Victor Kestenbaum (ed.), The Phenomenology of Physical Illness, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agich, G.J. (1982). The Concept of Responsibility in Medicine. In: Agich, G.J. (eds) Responsibility in Health Care. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7831-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7831-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7833-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7831-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics