iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30729-4_13
A Proof Framework for Concurrent Programs | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

A Proof Framework for Concurrent Programs

  • Conference paper
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7321))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 674 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a proof framework for verifying concurrent programs that communicate using global variables. The approach is geared towards verification of models that have an unbounded state size and are as close to the original code as possible. The bakery algorithm is used as a demonstration of the framework basics, while the (full) framework with thread synchronization was used to verify and correct the reentrant readers writers algorithm as used in the Qt library.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer, M.: TAME: Using PVS strategies for special-purpose theorem proving. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baier, C., Katoen, J.-P.: Principles of Model Checking (Representation and Mind Series). The MIT Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basten, T., Hooman, J.: Process Algebra in PVS. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) TACAS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1579, pp. 270–284. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. de Groot, A.: Practical Automaton Proofs in PVS. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23(5), 279–295 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz, S.: Faithful Translations among Models and Specifications. In: Oliveira, J., Zave, P. (eds.) FME 2001. LNCS, vol. 2021, pp. 419–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamport, L.: A New Solution of Dijkstra’s Concurrent Programming Problem. Commun. ACM 17(8), 453–455 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: UPPAAL in a nutshell. Software Tools for Technology Transfer 1(1-2), 134–152 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Owre, S., Rajan, S., Rushby, J., Shankar, N., Srivas, M.: PVS: Combining Specification, Proof Checking, and Model Checking. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102, pp. 411–414. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Owre, S., Rushby, J.M., Shankar, N.: PVS: A Prototype Verification System. In: Kapur, D. (ed.) CADE 1992. LNCS, vol. 607, pp. 747–752. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pantelic, V., Jin, X.-H., Lawford, M., Parnas, D.L.: Inspection of concurrent systems: Combining tables, theorem proving and model checking. In: Software Engineering Research and Practice, pp. 629–635 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ripon, S., Miller, A.: Verification of symmetry detection using pvs. ECEASST 35 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sutter, H.: The Free Lunch Is Over: A Fundamental Turn Toward Concurrency in Software. Dr. Dobb’s Journal 30(3) (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Gastel, B., Lensink, L., Smetsers, S., van Eekelen, M.: Reentrant Readers-Writers: A Case Study Combining Model Checking with Theorem Proving. In: Cofer, D., Fantechi, A. (eds.) FMICS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5596, pp. 85–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. van Gastel, B., Lensink, L., Smetsers, S., van Eekelen, M.: Deadlock and Starvation Free Reentrant Readers-Writers. Sci. Comput. Program. 76(2), 82–99 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lensink, L., Smetsers, S., van Eekelen, M. (2012). A Proof Framework for Concurrent Programs. In: Derrick, J., Gnesi, S., Latella, D., Treharne, H. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7321. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30729-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30729-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30729-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics