iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_7
Towards a Decision Tool for Choosing a Business Process Maturity Model | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Towards a Decision Tool for Choosing a Business Process Maturity Model

  • Conference paper
Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice (DESRIST 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7286))

Abstract

The importance of maturity models and business process management (BPM) is already recognized, resulting in many business process maturity models (BPMMs) to progress in BPM. Nonetheless, practitioners have no overview of existing BPMMs and their differences, which makes an informed choice difficult. Choosing the right model is, however, important, as our previous research indicated a great diversity of BPMMs. Therefore, we will design a decision tool that organizations can use to select a BPMM that best fits their needs. The current article introduces possible decision criteria for the tool. Furthermore, the methodology and the conceptual model are discussed. It is argued that the final decision tool can be extended with additional criteria and BPMMs, and translated towards other (maturity) models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G.: Defining Business Process Maturity. A Journey towards Excellence. TQM & Business Excellence 22(11), 1119–1137 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design. In: 4th DESRIST Conference, pp. 1–9. ACM, Malvern (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. van Steenbergen, M., Bos, R., Brinkkemper, S., van de Weerd, I., Bekkers, W.: The Design of Focus Area Maturity Models. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 317–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. In: 18th ACIS Conference, Toowoomba, pp. 642–653 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maier, A.M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: A Review of Maturity Grid based Approaches to Assessing Organizational Capabilities. In: Academy of Management Meeting (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Afzal, W., Roland, D., Al-Squri, M.N.: Information Asymmetry and Product Valuation: an Exploratory Study. Journal of Information Science 35(2), 192–203 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon, H.A.: Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. The American Economic Review 69(4), 493–513 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wallenius, J., et al.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory. Management Science 54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful was our 1992 Initial Rendition? JITTA: Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 43–58 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mintzberg, H.: Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation. Management Science 18(2), B97–B110 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harvey, C.M., Koubek, R.J.: Cognitive, Social, and Environmental Attributes of Distributed Engineering Collaboration: a Review and Proposed Model of Collaboration. Human Factors & Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10(4), 369–393 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacity, M.C., Janson, M.A.: Understanding Qualitative Data: a Framework of Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Management Information Systems 11(2), 137–155 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science 9(3), 458–467 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van De Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L.: The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. The Academy of Management Journal 17(4), 605–621 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an Example, Design Constructions and Applications. Information & Management 42, 15–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., McKenna, H.: Research Guidelines for the Delphi Survey Technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(4), 1008–1015 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheibe, M., Skutsch, M., Schofer, J.: Experiments in Delphi Methodology. In: Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M. (eds.) The Delphi Method, pp. 257–281. Addison-Wesley, London (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.L.: Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making. The Analytical Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM 102(2), 251–318 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vanthienen, J., Wets, G.: Integration of the Decision Table Formalism with a Relational Database Environment. Information Systems 20(7), 595–616 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G. (2012). Towards a Decision Tool for Choosing a Business Process Maturity Model. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29862-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29863-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics