Abstract
For clinical processes, meaningful variations may be related to care performance or even the patient survival. It is imperative that the variations be predicted timely so that the patient care “journey” can be more adaptive and efficient. This study addresses the question of how to predict variations in clinical processes. Given the assumption that a clinical case with low appropriateness between its specific patient state and its’ applied medical intervention is more likely to be a variation than other cases, this paper proposes a method to construct an appropriateness measure model based on historical clinical cases so as to predict such variations in future cases of clinical processes. The proposed method is demonstrated on a real life data set from the Chinese Liberation Army General Hospital. The experimental results confirm the given assumption and indicate the feasibility of the proposed method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peleg, M., Gutnik, L.A., Snow, V., Patel, V.L.: Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 39(2), 184–195 (2006)
Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT support for healthcare processes-premises, challenges, perspectives. Data & Knowledge Engineering 61(1), 39–58 (2007)
Huang, Z., Lu, X., Duan, H.: Supporting adaptive clinical treatment processes through recommendations. Computer Methods and Programms in Biomedicine (2010) (accpeted)
Huang, Z., Lu, X., Duan, H.: Using recommendation to support adaptive clinical pathways. Journal of Medical Systems (2010) (accpeted)
Chu, S., Cesnik, B.: Improving clinical pathway design: lessons learned from a computerised prototype. International Journal of Medical Informatics 51(1), 1–11 (1998)
Okita, A., et al.: Variance analysis of a clinical pathway of video-assisted single lobectomy for lung cancer. Surgery Today 39 (2009)
van de Klundert, J., Gorissen, P., Zeemering, S.: Measuring clinical pathway adherence. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics (2010) (in press, corrected proof)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)
Adlassnig, K.P., Combi, C., Das, A.K., Keravnou, E.T., Pozzi, G.: Temporal representation and reasoning in medicine: research directions and challenges. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 38(2), 101–113 (2006)
Peleg, M., Tu, S.W.: Design patterns for clinical guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 47(1), 1–24 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, Z., Lu, X., Gan, C., Duan, H. (2011). Variation Prediction in Clinical Processes. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6747. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22218-4_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22217-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22218-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)