iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04319-2_14
Automatic CAD Models Comparison and Re-meshing in the Context of Mechanical Design Optimization | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Automatic CAD Models Comparison and Re-meshing in the Context of Mechanical Design Optimization

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 18th International Meshing Roundtable

Abstract

A lot of research work has been focused on integrating FEA (finite elements analysis) with CAD (Computer Aided Design) over the last decade. In spite of improvements brought by this integration, research work remains to be done in order to better integrate all the operations led during the whole design process. The design process involves several modifications of an initial design solution and until now, in this context, the communication between CAD modules (dedicated to different tasks involved in the product design process) remains static. Consequently, there is a need for more flexible communication processes between CAD modules through the design cycle, if not through the product life cycle. Some approaches have been developed aiming at the reduction of the design process length when using FEA, and aiming at the automation of part’s data transfer from one step of the process to the next one. Automatic re-meshing is one of these approaches. It consists in automatically updating the part’s mesh around modifications zones, in the case of a minor change in the part’s design, without the need to re-mesh the entire part. The purpose of this paper is to present a new tool, aiming at the improvement of automatic re-meshing procedures. This tool basically consists in automatically identifying and locating modifications between two versions of a CAD model (typically an initial design and a modified design) through the design process. The knowledge of these modifications is then used to fit portions of the initial design’s mesh to the modified design (a process referred to as automatic re-meshing). A major benefit of the approach presented here is that it is completely independent of the description frame of both models, which is made possible with the use of vector-based geometric representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iyer, N., Jayanti, S., Lou, K., Kalyanaraman, Y., Ramani, K.: Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer-Aided Design 37(5), 509–530 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardone, A., Gupta, S.K., Karnik, M.: A Survey of Shape Similarity Assessment Algorithms for Product Design and Manufacturing Applications. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 3(2), 109–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, T., Lee, K., Kim, S., Chu, C., Lee, H.: Similarity comparison of mechanical parts. Computer-Aided Design and Application 2(6), 759–768 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hilaga, M., Shinagawa, Y., Kohmura, T., Kunii, T.L.: Topology Matching for Fully Automatic Similarity Estimation of 3D Shapes. In: SIGGRAPH 2001, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Osada, R., Funkhouser, T.A., Chazelle, B., Dobkin, D.P.: Matching 3D Models with Shape Distributions. In: Shape Modeling International. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ohbuchi, R., Minamitani, T., Takei, T.: Shape-Similarity Search of 3D Models by using Enhanced Shape Functions. In: TPCG (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saupe, D., Vranic, D.V.: 3D model retrieval with spherical harmonics and moments. In: Radig, B., Florczyk, S. (eds.) DAGM 2001. LNCS, vol. 2191, p. 392. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cicirello, V.A., Regli, W.C.: Machining Feature-Based Comparisons of Mechanical Parts. In: Shape Modeling International (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramesh, M., Yip-Hoi, D., Dutta, D.: Feature Based Shape Similarity Measurement for Retrieval of Mechanical Parts. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 1(3), 245–257 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Francois, V., Cuilliere, J.-C.: 3D Automatic remeshing applied to model modification. Computer Aided Design 32(7), 433–444 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Serre, P., Riviere, A., Clement, A.: Geometric Product Specification and Verification: Integration of Functionality. In: Analysis of fonctional geometrical specification, pp. 115–125. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mortenson, M.E.: Geometric Modeling (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Souaissa, K., Hadjsalah, H., Benamara, A., Cuillière, J.C., Francois, V.: Outil de recherche de formes CAO identiques. In: CSME 2008, Ottawa (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Serre, P., Riviere, A., Clement, A.: The clearence effect for assemblability of over-contrained mechanism. In: 8th CIRPP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Charlotte, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clement, A., Riviere, A., Serre, P., Valade, C.: The TTRS: 13 Constraints for Dimensionning and Tolerancing. In: 5th CIRPP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Toronto, Canada (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Piegl, L.A., Tiller, W.: The NURBS book (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Francois, V., Cuilliere, J.-C.: An a priori adaptive 3D advancing front mesh generator integrated to solid modeling. In: Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 337–346 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Francois, V., Cuilliere, J.-C.: Automatic mesh pre-optimization based on the geometric discretization error. Advances in Engineering Software 31(10), 763–774 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cuillière, JC., François, V., Souaissa, K., Benamara, A., BelHadjSalah, H. (2009). Automatic CAD Models Comparison and Re-meshing in the Context of Mechanical Design Optimization. In: Clark, B.W. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Meshing Roundtable. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04319-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04319-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04318-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04319-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics