Abstract
Developing interoperability implies defining metrics to measure the degree of interoperability between systems. One of the measures is concerned with the use of maturity models, describing the stages through which systems should evolve to reach higher completeness in the realization of a given objective. This paper reviews the main maturity models that are or could be used for interoperability measure, comparing their different aspects in order to evaluate their relevance and coverage with respect to enterprise interoperability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thomas, C., Ford, J.M., Colombi, S.R., Graham, D.R.: A Survey on Interoperability Measurement. In: 12th ICCRTS, Rhode Island (2007)
IEEE Standards Information Network. IEEE 100, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, 7th edn. IEEE, New York (2000)
Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Chen, D.: A systemic approach to interoperability formalization. In: IFAC WC 2008, invited session on Semantic-Based Solutions for Enterprise Integration and Networking, Seoul, Korea (July 2008)
Panetto, H.: Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications. International journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 20(8), 727–740 (2007)
International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC 15504 Software Process Improvement and Capability DEtermination Model (SPICE) (2001)
C4ISR Interoperability Working Group, Levels of information systems interoperability (lisi), Tech. report, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC (1998)
Clark, T., Jones, R.: Organisational interoperability maturity model for c2. In: Proc. of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Whashington (1999)
Tolk, A., Muguira, J.A.: The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, USA (September 2003)
ATHENA. Advanced Technologies for Interoperability of Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and their Applications, FP6-2002-IST1, Integrated Project Proposal (April 2003)
Guedria, W.: Decision-support for diagnosis of system’s interoperability. In: I-ESA 2008 Doctoral Symposium, 4th International Conference Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications, Berlin, Germany (2008)
Method Integrated Team.: Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI), Version 1.1: Method Definition Document Members of the Assessment (2001)
COMPTIA. European Interoperability Framework, white paper, ICT Industry Recommendations; Brussels (2004)
INTEROP, Enterprise Interoperability -Framework and knowledge corpus- Final report, INTEROP NOE, FP6 -Contact n 508011, Deliverable DI.3 (May 2007)
ISO 14258 - Industrial Automation Systems – Concepts and Rules for Enterprise Models, ISO TC184/SC5/WG1 1999-April-14 version (1999).
Von Bertalanfy, L.: General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. Georges Braziller, Inc., New York (1968)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., Chen, D. (2008). Interoperability Maturity Models – Survey and Comparison –. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88874-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88875-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)