iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_29
The Evaluation of Sentence Similarity Measures | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

The Evaluation of Sentence Similarity Measures

  • Conference paper
Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5182))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The ability to accurately judge the similarity between natural language sentences is critical to the performance of several applications such as text mining, question answering, and text summarization. Given two sentences, an effective similarity measure should be able to determine whether the sentences are semantically equivalent or not, taking into account the variability of natural language expression. That is, the correct similarity judgment should be made even if the sentences do not share similar surface form. In this work, we evaluate fourteen existing text similarity measures which have been used to calculate similarity score between sentences in many text applications. The evaluation is conducted on three different data sets, TREC9 question variants, Microsoft Research paraphrase corpus, and the third recognizing textual entailment data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, X.: Utilizing Sentence Similarity and Question Type Similarity to Response to Similar Questions in Knowledge-Sharing Community. In: Proceedings of QAWeb 2008 Workshop, Beijing, China (to appear, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, J., Bolivar, A., Wade, C.: Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2003, pp. 314–321 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balasubramanian, N., Allan, J., Croft, W.B.: A comparison of sentence retrieval techniques. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2007, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 813–814 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: Extended gloss overlap as a measure of semantic relatedness. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 805–810 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of semantic distance. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of the PASCAL Workshop (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dolan, W., Quirk, C., Brockett, C.: Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel new sources. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoad, T., Zobel, J.: Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarized documents. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 54(3), 203–215 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., Rehder, B., Schreiner, M.E.: How Well Can Passage Meaning Be Derived without Using Word Order? A Comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and Humans. In: Proc. 19th Ann. Meeting of the Cognitive Science Soc., pp. 412–417 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z.A., O’Shea, J.D., Crockett, K.: Sentence Similarity Based on Semantic Nets and Corpus Statistics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 18(8), 1138–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth international Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malik, R., Subramaniam, V., Kaushik, S.: Automatically Selecting Answer Templates to Respond to Customer Emails. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India, pp. 1659–1664 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Metzler, D., Bernstein, Y., Croft, W., Moffat, A., Zobel, J.: Similarity measures for tracking information flow. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 517–524 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Metzler, D., Dumais, S.T., Meek, C.: Similarity Measures for Short Segments of Text. In: Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (eds.) ECIR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4425, pp. 16–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and Knowledge-based Measures of Text Semantic Similarity. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2006, Boston (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murdock, V.: Aspects of sentence retrieval. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papineni, K.: Why inverse document frequency? In: Proceeding of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 25–32 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ponzetto, S.P., Strube, M.: Knowledge Derived From Wikipedia for Computing Semantic Relatedness. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30, 181–212 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sahami, M., Heilman, T.D.: A web-based kernel function for measuring the similarity of short text snippets. In: Proceedings of WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 377–386 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tomuro, N.: Interrogative Reformulation Patterns and Acquisition of Question Paraphrases. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international Workshop on Paraphrasing, pp. 33–40 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Il-Yeol Song Johann Eder Tho Manh Nguyen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., Shen, X. (2008). The Evaluation of Sentence Similarity Measures. In: Song, IY., Eder, J., Nguyen, T.M. (eds) Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5182. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85836-2_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85835-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85836-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics