iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73210-5_8
Inheriting Laws for Processes with States | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Inheriting Laws for Processes with States

  • Conference paper
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4591))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper studies the laws of communicating sequential processes (CSP) with Z-like initial and final states. Instead of defining a large semantics including all observable aspects, we incrementally develop the model in three stages: partially correct relational model, then totally correct sequential model and finally the reactive-process model with states. The properties of each model are captured as algebraic laws. A law in one model may or may not be true in its submodels. We apply a technique based on healthiness conditions to identify the conditions for law inheritance. Such abstract conditions themselves can be captured as pattern laws of commutativity. The model uses a new approach to define parallel compositions using just the primitive commands, nondeterministic choice, conjunction and some unary (hiding) operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramsky, S., Jung, A.: Domain theory. In: Abramsky, S., Gabbay, D., Maibaum, T.S.E. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, pp. 1–168. Oxford University Press, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Back, R.J., von Wright, J.: Trace refinement of action systems. In: International Conference on Concurrency Theory, pp. 367–384 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, M.: A CSP Approach To Action Systems. PhD thesis, OUCL, University of Oxford, Oxford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cavalcanti, A., Woodcock, J.: Predicate transformers in the semantics of Circus. IEE Proceedings - Software 150(2), 85–94 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y.: Generic composition. Formal Aspects of Computing 14(2), 108–122 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y.: Hierarchical organisation of predicate-semantic models. In: Dunne, S., Stoddart, B. (eds.) UTP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4010, pp. 155–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y.: Sharing properties between programming models. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Durham University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, Y., Sanders, J.W.: Logic of global synchrony. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 26(2), 221–262 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dijkstra, E.W.: Guarded commands, nondeterminacy and the formal derivation of programs. Communications of the ACM 18(8), 453–457 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoare, C.A.R.: Dicussions about parallel composition as conjunction. Private communication (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoare, C.A.R., He, J.: Unifying Theories of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan, C.C.: Beauty is our business: a birthday salute to Edsger W. Dijkstra, chapter Of wp and CSP, pp. 319–326. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roscoe, A.W.: The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, S., Treharne, H.: Verifying controlled components. In: Boiten, E.A., Derrick, J., Smith, G.P. (eds.) IFM 2004. LNCS, vol. 2999, pp. 87–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, J., Chen, Y.: Generating C code from LOGS specifications. In: Liu, Z., Araki, K. (eds.) ICTAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3407, pp. 195–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jim Davies Jeremy Gibbons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, Y. (2007). Inheriting Laws for Processes with States. In: Davies, J., Gibbons, J. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4591. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73210-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73210-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73209-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73210-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics