iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68679-8_23
A Heterogeneous Approach to UML Semantics | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Heterogeneous Approach to UML Semantics

  • Chapter
Concurrency, Graphs and Models

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5065))

  • 853 Accesses

Abstract

UML models consist of several diagrams of different types describing different views of a software system ranging from specifications of the static system structure to descriptions of system snapshots and dynamic behaviour. In this paper a heterogeneous approach to the semantics of UML is proposed where each diagram type can be described in its “natural” semantics, and the relations between diagram types are expressed by appropriate translations. More formally, the UML family of diagram types is represented as a “heterogeneous institution environment”: each diagram type is described as an appropriate institution where typically the data structures occurring in a diagram are represented by signature elements whereas the relationships between data and the dynamic behaviour of objects are captured by sentences; in several cases, the diagrams are themselves the sentences. The relationship between two diagram types is described by a socalled institution comorphism, and in case no institution comorphism exists, by a co-span of such comorphisms. Consistency conditions between different diagrams are derived from the comorphism translations. This heterogeneous semantic approach to UML is illustrated by several example diagram types including class diagrams, OCL, and interaction diagrams.

This work has been partially sponsored by the project Sensoria IST-2005-016004, and the DFG projects InfoZert, MAEWA and rUML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrade, L., Baldan, P., Baumeister, H., Bruni, R., Corradini, A., De Nicola, R., Fiadeiro, J.L., Gadducci, F., Gnesi, S., Hoffman, P., Koch, N., Kosiuczenko, P., Lapadula, A., Latella, D., Lopes, A., Loreti, M., Massink, M., Mazzanti, F., Montanari, U., Oliveira, C., Pugliese, R., Tarlecki, A., Wermelinger, M., Wirsing, M., Zawłocki, A.: AGILE: Software architecture for mobility. In: Wirsing, M., Pattinson, D., Hennicker, R. (eds.) WADT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2755. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstra, J.A., Klop, J.W.: Process Algebra for Synchronous Communication. Information and Control 60(1–3), 109–137 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernot, G., Coudert, S., Gall, P.L.: Towards Heterogenous Formal Specifications. In: Wirsing, M., Nivat, M. (eds.) AMAST 1996. LNCS, vol. 1101, pp. 458–472. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boreale, M., Bruni, R., Caires, L., De Nicola, R., Lanese, I., Loreti, M., Martins, F., Montanari, U., Ravara, A., Sangiorgi, D., Vasconcelos, V., Zavattaro, G.: SCC: a Service Centered Calculus. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) Proc. 3rd Int. Wsh. Web Services and Formal Methods (WS-FM 2006). Lect. Notes Comp. Sci., vol. 4184, pp. 38–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broy, M., Cengarle, M.V., Rumpe, B.: Semantics of UML – Towards a System Model for UML: The Structural Data Model. Technical Report TUM-I0612, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broy, M., Cengarle, M.V., Rumpe, B.: Semantics of UML – Towards a System Model for UML: The Control Model. Technical Report TUM-I0710, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broy, M., Cengarle, M.V., Rumpe, B.: Semantics of UML – Towards a System Model for UML: The State Machine Model. Technical Report TUM-I0711, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Broy, M., Stølen, K.: Specification and Development of Interactive Systems: Focus on Streams, Interfaces, and Refinement. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Broy, M., Wirsing, M.: Algebraic State Machines. In: Rus, T. (ed.) AMAST 2000. LNCS, vol. 1816, pp. 89–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruni, R., Lluch-Lafuente, A., Montanari, U., Tuosto, E.: Style-based architectural reconfigurations. Technical Report TR-07-17, Computer Science Department, University of Pisa (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Calegari, D.: UML 2.0 Interactions with OCL/RT Constraints. Master’s thesis, InCo-PEDECIBA, Technical report 07-17 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cengarle, M.V.: The Rewriting Logic institution. Technical Report 9801, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut für Informatik (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cengarle, M.V.: The Temporal Logic institution. Technical Report 9805, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut für Informatik (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: Towards OCL/RT. In: Eriksson, L.-H., Lindsay, P.A. (eds.) FME 2002. LNCS, vol. 2391, pp. 390–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: OCL 1.4/1.5 vs. OCL 2.0 Expressions: Formal Semantics and Expressiveness. Softw. Syst. Model. 3(1), 9–30 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: UML 2.0 Interactions: Semantics and Refinement. In: Jürjens, J., Fernandez, E.B., France, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) Proc. 3\(^{\text{rd}}\) Int. Wsh. Critical Systems Development with UML (CSDUML 2004), pp. 85–99 (2004); Technical Report TUM-I0415, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: An Institution for OCL 2.0. Technical Report 0801, Institut für Informatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: An Institution for UML 2.0 Interactions. Technical Report TUM-I0808, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A.: An Institution for UML 2.0 Static Structures. Technical Report TUM-I0807, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Diaconescu, R.: Institution-independent Model Theory. Birkhäuser (to appear, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ehrig, H., Padberg, J., Orejas, F.: From basic views and aspects to integration of specification formalisms. In: Paun, G., Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Current Trends in Theoretical Computer Science: Entering the 21th Century, pp. 202–214. World Scientific, Singapore (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A., Bocchi, L.: A Formal Approach to Service Component Architecture. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 193–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Fischer, C.: CSP-OZ: How to Combine Z with a Process Algebra. In: Bowman, H., Derrick, J. (eds.) Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems (FMOODS 1997), pp. 423–438. Chapman & Hall, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gadducci, F., Montanari, U.: The Tile Model. In: Plotkin, G., Stirling, C., Tofte, M. (eds.) Proof, Language, and Interaction: Essays in Honour of Robin Milner. Foundations Of Computing Series, pp. 133–166. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goguen, J.A.: Data, schema, ontology and logic integration. Logic J. IGPL 13(6), 685–715 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Introducing Institutions. In: Clarke, E., Kozen, D. (eds.) Logics of Programs. LNCS, vol. 164, pp. 221–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Institutions: Abstract Model Theory for Specification and Programming. J. ACM 39(1), 95–146 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Zavattaro, G.: SOCK: A Calculus for Service-Oriented Computing. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 327–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Goguen, J.A., Rosu, G.: Institution Morphisms. Form. Asp. Comp. 13(3-5), 274–307 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A Calculus for Orchestration of Web Services. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. MacLane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer, Heidelberg (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mayer, P., Schroeder, A., Koch, N.: A Model-Driven Approach to Service Orchestration. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Services Computing (SCC 2008) (submitted, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meseguer, J.: General Logics. In: Ebbinghaus, H.D., Fernandez-Prida, J., Garrido, M., Lascar, D. (eds.) Logic Colloquium 1987, pp. 275–329. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meseguer, J.: Conditional Rewriting Logic as a Unified Model of Concurrency. Theo. Comp. Sci. 96, 73–155 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Meseguer, J., Montanari, U.: Mapping Tile Logic into Rewriting Logic. In: Parisi-Presicce, F. (ed.) WADT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1376, pp. 62–91. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mossakowski, T.: Heterogenous Development Graphs and Heterogeneous Borrowing. In: Nielsen, M., Engberg, U. (eds.) FOSSACS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2303, pp. 326–341. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Mossakowski, T.: Heterogeneous Specification and the Heterogeneous Tool Set. Habilitation thesis, Universität Bremen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K.: The Heterogeneous Tool Set. In: Grumberg, O., Huth, M. (eds.) TACAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4424, pp. 519–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Naur, P., Randell, B.: Software Engineering — Report on a Conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee. NATO Sci. Affairs Div., Bruxelles, Garmisch (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pepper, P., Wirsing, M.: A Method for the Development of Correct Software. In: Jähnichen, S., Broy, M. (eds.) KORSO 1995. LNCS, vol. 1009, pp. 27–57. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pratt, V.: Modeling Concurrency with Partial Orders. Int. J. Parallel Program. 15(1), 33–71 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Reggio, G., Repetto, L.: CASL-CHART: A Combination of Statecharts and the Algebraic Specification Language CASL. In: Rus, T. (ed.) AMAST 2000. LNCS, vol. 1816, pp. 243–272. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Tarlecki, A.: Institution representation. Unpublished note, Dept.of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tarlecki, A.: Moving between Logical Systems. In: Haveraaen, M., Dahl, O.-J., Owe, O. (eds.) Abstract Data Types 1995 and COMPASS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1130, pp. 478–502. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tarlecki, A.: Towards heterogeneous specifications. In: Gabbay, D., de Rijke, M. (eds.) Frontiers of Combining Systems. Studies in Logic and Computation, vol. 2, pp. 337–360. Research Studies Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tarlecki, A.: Abstract Specification Theory: An Overview. In: Broy, M., Pizka, M. (eds.) Models, Algebras, and Logics of Engineering Software. NATO Science Series — Computer and System Sciences, vol. 191, pp. 43–79. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wehrheim, H.: Behavioural Subtyping in Object-Oriented Specification Formalisms. Habilitationsschrift, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wirsing, M., Clark, A., Gilmore, S., Hölzl, M., Knapp, A., Koch, N., Schroeder, A.: Semantic-Based Development of Service-Oriented Systems. In: Najm, E., Pradat-Peyre, J.-F., Donzeau-Gouge, V.V. (eds.) FORTE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4229, pp. 24–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Wirsing, M., Knapp, A.: View Consistency in Software Development. In: Wirsing, M., Knapp, A., Balsamo, S. (eds.) RISSEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2941, pp. 341–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wirsing, M., Nicola, R.D., Gilmore, S., Hölzl, M.M., Lucchi, R., Tribastone, M., Zavattaro, G.: Sensoria process calculi for service-oriented computing. In: Montanari, U., Sannella, D., Bruni, R. (eds.) TGC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4661, pp. 30–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München,  

    María Victoria Cengarle

  2. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,  

    Alexander Knapp & Martin Wirsing

  3. Uniwersytet Warszawski,  

    Andrzej Tarlecki

Authors
  1. María Victoria Cengarle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrzej Tarlecki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Wirsing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Pierpaolo Degano Rocco De Nicola José Meseguer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cengarle, M.V., Knapp, A., Tarlecki, A., Wirsing, M. (2008). A Heterogeneous Approach to UML Semantics. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds) Concurrency, Graphs and Models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5065. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68679-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68679-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68676-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68679-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation