iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_7
Generic Knowledge Strategies | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Generic Knowledge Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergent Knowledge Strategies

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 4))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce generic knowledge strategies, which aim at increasing the level of organizational knowledge and creating the intangible infrastructure for company strategies and achieving competitive advantage. The main characteristic of these generic strategies is that they can be developed in any organization although their success is related to a specific organizational context and a given business environment. The ontology of these generic strategies comes from the equilibrium dynamics of organizational knowledge and the correlation with the known-unknowns matrix. The generic knowledge strategies presented in this chapter are the following: exploitation strategies, acquisition strategies, sharing strategies and exploration or knowledge creation strategies. Exploitation knowledge strategies are designed in a similar way to low cost business strategies and efficiency models. This is a consequence of the fact that managers know what they know, which means that they know very well their intangible resources. Acquisition knowledge strategies are designed as a result of the identification of a strategic knowledge gap. Sharing knowledge strategies are specific for knowledge management and they contribute to increase the level of organizational knowledge by its diffusion within the whole organization. Exploration knowledge strategies focus on knowledge creation and on feeding the innovation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andriessen, D. (2004). Making sense of intellectual capital: Designing a method for valuation of intangibles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherval, R. (2010). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E. (2016, September 1–2). Methods of measuring knowledge: Analysis and classification. In S. Moffett & B. Galbraith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK (pp. 91–100).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., & Oltramari, A. (2012). Knowledge as a measurable object in business context: A stock-and-flow approach. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(3), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu, C. (2007). Thinking patterns and knowledge dynamics. In B. Martins & D. Remenyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 1, pp. 152–157). Reading, MA: Academic Conferences Publishing International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu C (2009, April 28–29) The frontier of linearity in the IC metaphor. In C Stam, D Andriessen (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, The Netherlands, pp. 97-103. Academic Publishing Limited, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu, C. (2011). Changing paradigm for knowledge metaphors from dynamics to thermodynamics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(2), 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu, C. (2015a). Organizational knowledge dynamics: Managing knowledge creation, acquisition, sharing, and transformation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu, C. (2015b). Developing strategic thinking in business education. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(3), 409–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratianu, C., Agapie, A., & Orzea, I. (2011). Modeling organizational knowledge dynamics: Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 236–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguit, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The Mind Map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. London: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciatori, E., Tamoschus, D., & Grabher, G. (2012). Knowledge transfer across projects: Codification in creative, high-tech and engineering industries. Management Learning, 43(3), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. R., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2010). Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, I., & Chao, C. K. (2008). Knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I., & Mangles, T. (2000). Business networks: Assisting knowledge management and competence acquisition within UK manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 7(2), 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E., Feldon, D. F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Yates, K. A., & Early, S. (2008). Cognitive task analysis. In J. M. Spector & M. D. Driscall (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., David, P. A., & Foray, D. (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 532–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, S., & Choo, C. W. (2010). The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 824–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, P., & Acar, W. (2010). Software and human agents in knowledge codification. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, D. W. (2004). Lost knowledge: Confronting the threat of an aging workforce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K. C., & Awazu, Y. (2006). Knowledge management at SMEs: Five peculiarities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, S., Huijsen, W. O., & Grootveld, M. (2007). A framework for evaluating knowledge-mapping tools. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durst, S., & Edvardson, I. R. (2012). Knowledge management in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eucker, T. R. (2007). Understanding the impact of tacit knowledge loss. KM Review, 10(2), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner Jr., L. V. (2003). Who says elephants can’t dance? How I turned around IBM. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. London: Little Brown Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoe, S. L., & McShane, S. (2010). Structural and informal knowledge acquisition and dissemination in organizational learning. An exploratory analysis. The Learning Organization, 17(4), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janicot, C., & Mignon, S. (2012). Knowledge codification in audit and consulting firms: A conceptual and empirical approach. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara, A. (2011). Knowledge management: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Whittington, R., & Scholes, K. (2011). Exploring strategy: Text & cases (9th ed.). London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahney, L. (2008). Inside Steve’s brain. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, T. Y., Yang, M. H., Wu, J. T. B., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2016). Co-creating value with consumers through social media. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, E., & Guzman, F. (2016). Co-creation of brand identities: Consumer and industry influence and motivations. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(5), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Suh, E., & Hwang, H. (2003). Building the knowledge map: An industrial case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, M. (2011). Knowledge integration dynamics: Developing strategic innovation capability. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Fink, D. (2013). Knowledge mapping: Encouragements and impediments to adoption. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefter, V., Bratianu, C., Agapie, A., Agoston, S., & Orzea, I. (2011). Intergenerational knowledge transfer in the academic environment of knowledge-based economy. Amfiteatru Economic, 13(30), 392–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, D. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of human obsession. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H., CC, W., DC, H., & Tsui, K. A. (2010). Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: An empirical study on Taiwan’s financial and manufacturing industries. Journal of Information Science, 36(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. (2005). Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. A., & Deokar, A. V. (2016). Understanding knowledge creation in the context of knowledge-intensive business processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 858–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh, J., & Kent, A. (2016). Co-creation and the development of SME designer fashion enterprises. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 20(3), 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, N. R. (2007). Knowledge acquisition in practice: A step-by-step guide. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15, 617–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, K., & Gueldenberg, S. (2011). Effective knowledge work: Answers to the management challenges of the 21st century. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, C., & Hubert, C. (2011). The new edge in knowledge: How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiola, M., Bolisani, E., & Scarso, E. (2013). Characterisation of knowledge-based networking strategies: Insights from the KIBS sector. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 13(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasher, E., & Ronen, T. (2011). The complete guide to knowledge management: A strategic plan to leverage your company’s intellectual capital. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paswan, A. K., D’Souza, D., & Rajamma, R. K. (2014). Value co-creation through knowledge exchange in franchising. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(2), 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(November–December), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2013). Strategy and co-creation thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 41(6), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumsfeld, D. (2002). Press conference at the U.S. Department of Defense. Accessed January 10, 2014, from http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?trasncriptid=2636

  • Salmador, M. P., & Florin, J. (2013). Knowledge creation and competitive advantage in turbulent environments: A process model of organizational learning. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(4), 374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarso, E., & Bolisani, E. (2012). Trust in knowledge exchanges between service providers and clients: A multiple case study of KIBS. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiuma, G. (2009). The managerial foundations of knowledge assets dynamics. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7, 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1999). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C., & Strong, B. A. (2014). Strategic conversations: Creating and directing the entrepreneurial workforce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studdard, N. L., & Munchus, G. (2009). Entrepreneurial firms’ acquisition of knowledge using proactive help-seeking behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 15(3), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (2010). Methods for measuring intangible assets. (Online). Accessed February 10, 2017, from http://www.sveiby.com/articles/intangibleMethods.htm

  • Szulanski, G. (1995). Unpacking stickiness: An empirical investigation of the barriers to transfer best practice inside the firm. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995, 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M. (1997). The leadership engine: How winning companies build leaders at every level. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo-Alonso, B., Rodriguez-Castellanos, A., & Arregui-Ayastuy, G. (2011). Identifying, measuring, and valuing knowledge-based intangible assets: New perspectives. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, C., & Popescu, I. (2005). An experience in knowledge mapping. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verleye, K. (2015). The co-creation experience from the customer perspective: Its measurement and determinants. Journal of Service Management, 26(2), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hipel, E. (1994). ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovations. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). A guide to managing knowledge. Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K., Suh, E., & Kim, K. Y. (2007). Knowledge flow-based business process redesign: Applying a knowledge map to redesign a business process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vicenza, Italy

    Ettore Bolisani

  2. Faculty of Business Administration, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania

    Constantin Bratianu

Authors
  1. Ettore Bolisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Constantin Bratianu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C. (2018). Generic Knowledge Strategies. In: Emergent Knowledge Strategies. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation