iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49052-6_2
Multi-core SCC-Based LTL Model Checking | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multi-core SCC-Based LTL Model Checking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing (HVC 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10028))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate and improve the scalability of multi-core LTL model checking. Our algorithm, based on parallel DFS-like SCC decomposition, is able to efficiently decompose large SCCs on-the-fly, which is a difficult problem to solve in parallel.

To validate the algorithm we performed experiments on a 64-core machine. We used an extensive set of well-known benchmark collections obtained from the BEEM database and the Model Checking Contest. We show that the algorithm is competitive with the current state-of-the-art model checking algorithms. For larger models we observe that our algorithm outperforms the competitors. We investigate how graph characteristics relate to and pose limitations on the achieved speedups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In practice this is not exactly true, however all necessary conditions are preserved by using a fine-grained locking structure.

  2. 2.

    With sufficiently maintaining a DFS order we mean that for any two successive states v and w on the local search stack, we have \(v\rightarrow ^+w\); i.e. we do not require a direct edge from v to w, but w must be reachable from v.

  3. 3.

    Available at http://fi.muni.cz/~xstrejc/publications/spin2014.tar.gz.

  4. 4.

    Available at https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~renault/benchs/TACAS-2015/results.html.

  5. 5.

    Available at http://mcc.lip6.fr/2015/.

  6. 6.

    The reason for this selection is to avoid unrealistic computation times, since the scalability measurements require a run of a sequential algorithm as well.

  7. 7.

    When we discuss averages over the experiments, we always take the geometric mean.

References

  1. Blahoudek, F., Duret-Lutz, A., Křetínský, M., Strejček, J.: Is there a best Büchi automaton for explicit model checking? In: Proceedings of the 2014 International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking of Software, SPIN 2014, pp. 68–76. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloemen, V., Laarman, A., van de Pol, J.: Multi-core on-the-fly SCC decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, PPoPP 2016, pp. 8:1–8:12. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Courcoubetis, C., Vardi, M., Wolper, P., Yannakakis, M.: Memory-efficient algorithms for the verification of temporal properties. In: Kurshan, R. (ed.) Computer-Aided Verification, pp. 129–142. Springer US, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Couvreur, J.-M.: On-the-fly verification of linear temporal logic. In: Wing, J.M., Woodcock, J., Davies, J. (eds.) FM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1708, pp. 253–271. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48119-2_16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Couvreur, J.-M., Duret-Lutz, A., Poitrenaud, D.: On-the-fly emptiness checks for generalized Büchi automata. In: Godefroid, P. (ed.) SPIN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3639, pp. 169–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11537328_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dijkstra, E.W.: Finding the maximum strong components in a directed graph. In: Dijkstra, E.W. (ed.) Selected Writings on Computing: A personal Perspective. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science, pp. 22–30. Springer, New York (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Duret-Lutz, A., Lewkowicz, A., Fauchille, A., Michaud, T., Renault, É., Xu, L.: Spot 2.0 — a framework for LTL and \(\omega \)-automata manipulation. In: Artho, C., Legay, A., Peled, D. (eds.) ATVA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9938, pp. 122–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46520-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Evangelista, S., Laarman, A., Petrucci, L., van de Pol, J.: Improved multi-core nested depth-first search. In: Chakraborty, S., Mukund, M. (eds.) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7561, pp. 269–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Evangelista, S., Petrucci, L., Youcef, S.: Parallel nested depth-first searches for LTL model checking. In: Bultan, T., Hsiung, P.-A. (eds.) ATVA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6996, pp. 381–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleischer, L.K., Hendrickson, B., Pınar, A.: On identifying strongly connected components in parallel. In: Rolim, J. (ed.) IPDPS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1800, pp. 505–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi:10.1007/3-540-45591-4_68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaiser, A., Schwoon, S.: Comparison of Algorithms for Checking Emptiness on Büchi Automata. CoRR abs/0910.3766 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geldenhuys, J., Valmari, A.: Tarjan’s algorithm makes on-the-fly LTL verification more efficient. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 205–219. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Giannakopoulou, D., Lerda, F.: From states to transitions: improving translation of LTL formulae to Büchi automata. In: Peled, D.A., Vardi, M.Y. (eds.) FORTE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2529, pp. 308–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-36135-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Holzmann, G., Joshi, R., Groce, A.: Swarm verification techniques. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(6), 845–857 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holzmann, G., Peled, D., Yannakakis, M.: On nested depth first search. In: Proceedings of the Second SPIN Workshop, vol. 32, pp. 81–89 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, S., Rodia, N., Olukotun, K.: On fast parallel detection of strongly connected components (SCC) in small-world graphs. In: 2013 International Conference High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), pp. 1–11 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kant, G., Laarman, A., Meijer, J., Pol, J., Blom, S., Dijk, T.: LTSmin: high-performance language-independent model checking. In: Baier, C., Tinelli, C. (eds.) TACAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9035, pp. 692–707. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_61

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kordon, F., Garavel, H., Hillah, L.M., Hulin-Hubard, F., Chiardo, G., Hamez, A., Jezequel, L., Miner, A., Meijer, J., Paviot-Adet, E., Racordon, D., Rodriguez, C., Rohr, C., Srba, J., Thierry-Mieg, Y., Trinh, G., Wolf, K.: Complete Results for the 2016 Edition of the Model Checking Contest (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kordon, F., Garavel, H., Hillah, L.M., Hulin-Hubard, F., Linard, A., Beccuti, M., Hamez, A., Lopez-Bobeda, E., Jezequel, L., Meijer, J., Paviot-Adet, E., Rodriguez, C., Rohr, C., Srba, J., Thierry-Mieg, Y., Wolf, K.: Complete Results for the 2015 Edition of the Model Checking Contest (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laarman, A., Langerak, R., Pol, J., Weber, M., Wijs, A.: Multi-core nested depth-first search. In: Bultan, T., Hsiung, P.-A. (eds.) ATVA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6996, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Laarman, A., van de Pol, J.: Variations on multi-core nested depth-first search. In: Barnat, J., Heljanko, K. (eds.) PDMC 2011. EPTCS, vol. 72, pp. 13–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laarman, A., Pol, J., Weber, M.: Multi-core LTSmin: marrying modularity and scalability. In: Bobaru, M., Havelund, K., Holzmann, G.J., Joshi, R. (eds.) NFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6617, pp. 506–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20398-5_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe, G.: Concurrent depth-first search algorithms based on Tarjan’s algorithm. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 18(2), 1–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: A hierarchy of temporal properties. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC 1987, p. 205. ACM (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Orzan, S.: On Distributed Verification and Verified Distribution. Ph.D. thesis (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pelánek, R.: BEEM: benchmarks for explicit model checkers. In: Bošnački, D., Edelkamp, S. (eds.) SPIN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4595, pp. 263–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73370-6_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelánek, R.: Properties of state spaces and their applications. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 10(5), 443–454 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao, V.N., Kumar, V.: Superlinear speedup in parallel state-space search. In: Nori, K.V., Kumar, S. (eds.) Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 338, pp. 161–174. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Renault, E., Duret-Lutz, A., Kordon, F., Poitrenaud, D.: Parallel explicit model checking for generalized Büchi automata. In: Baier, C., Tinelli, C. (eds.) TACAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9035, pp. 613–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_56

    Google Scholar 

  30. Renault, E., Duret-Lutz, A., Kordon, F., Poitrenaud, D.: Variations on parallel explicit emptiness checks for generalized Büchi automata. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 1–21 (2016). http://link.springer.com/journal/10009/onlineFirst/page/1

  31. Schudy, W.: Finding strongly connected components in parallel using O(log2n) reachability queries. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA 2008, pp. 146–151. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schwoon, S., Esparza, J.: A note on on-the-fly verification algorithms. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 174–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Slota, G.M., Rajamanickam, S., Madduri, K.: BFS and coloring-based parallel algorithms for strongly connected components and related problems. In: 2014 IEEE 28th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pp. 550–559 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tarjan, R.E.: Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2), 146–160 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification. In: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 322–331. IEEE Computer Society (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Černá, I., Pelánek, R.: Relating hierarchy of temporal properties to model checking. In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds.) MFCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2747, pp. 318–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45138-9_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alfons Laarman for his aid with the implementation and Jeroen Meijer for his work on the Petri net benchmarks. We also thank Alexandre Duret-Lutz, Marcus Gerhold and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work is supported by the 3TU.BSR project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Formal Methods and Tools, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Vincent Bloemen & Jaco van de Pol

Authors
  1. Vincent Bloemen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaco van de Pol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Bloemen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IAIK, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria

    Roderick Bloem

  2. IBM Research Labs, Haifa, Israel

    Eli Arbel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bloemen, V., van de Pol, J. (2016). Multi-core SCC-Based LTL Model Checking. In: Bloem, R., Arbel, E. (eds) Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing. HVC 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10028. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49052-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49052-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49051-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49052-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation