Abstract
In physical and economic planning at both urban and regional scale, the role of participation is a key element of the planning process. Participation is often linked to organization forms (we call it “structures of participation”) that find a heterogeneous applications in the Urban Center model. This work analyses the first results of Project CAST (Active Citizenship for Sustainable Development of Territory), especially those related to the neighbourhood of Poggio Tre Galli in Potenza (Italy), where the test of a traditional/technological participatory approach has allowed the development of urban regeneration scenarios characterized by an inclusive approach “Citizens centred”. This is an operative contribution in terms of Inclusive Smart Planning, and so of evolutionary 2.0 approaches oriented to an inclusive and participative urban management through ICT tools. A singular feature of the ICT platform developed during the project CAST is the integration of management tools and streaming analysis of the main social networks with a SDI. The experience, described both in quantitative terms and as a strategic design of urban regeneration at neighbourhood scale, shows from one hand the request of bottom-up contributions, especially from institutions (i.e. Municipality), on the other hand, the need to test effective solutions to balance the commitment to manage and configure complex information systems according to quality results. Research perspectives look at the definition of web-assisted procedures for the participation in urban and territorial government choices that can reinforce bottom-up practices such as DSS, starting from ICT tools tested during the project CAST.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Luisi, D.: Dinamiche inclusive e costruzione dell’agency nelle politiche pubbliche partecipate. ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI (2016). Knapp, S., Coors, V.: The use of eParticipation systems in public participation: the VEPs example. In: Coors, V. et al. (eds) Urban and Regional Data Management, pp. 93–104. Taylor and Francis, London (2008)
Lanza, V., Prosperi, D.: Collaborative E-Governance: Describing and Pre-Calibrating the Digital Milieu in Urban and Regional Planning. Taylor and Francis, London (2009)
Cutini, V., Rusci, S.: Ai tempi della crisi. il mercato immobiliare e le influenze sulla pianificazione. ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI (2016)
Manganelli, B., Pontrandolfi, P., Azzato, A., Murgante, B.: Urban residential land value analysis: the case of Potenza. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 7974, pp. 304–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Murgante, B., Tilio, L., Lanza, V., Scorza, F.: Using participative GIS and e-tools for involving citizens of Marmo Platano-Melandro area in European programming activities. J. Balkan Near Eastern Stud. 13(1), 97–115 (2011)
Attardi, R., Cerreta, M., Franciosa, A., Gravagnuolo, A.: Valuing cultural landscape services: a multidimensional and multi-group SDSS for scenario simulations. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8581, pp. 398–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Ave, G.: Play it again Turin. Analysi del piano strategico di Torino come strumento di pianificazione della rigenerazione urbana. In: Martinelli, F. (ed.) La pianificazione strategica in Italia e in Europa: Metodologie ed esiti a confronto, pp. 35–67. Franco Angeli, Milan (2005)
Gibelli, M.C.: Vivibilità e nuova urbanità nelle politiche e nei progetti di rigenerazione urbana. In: Boniburini, L. (a cura di) Alla ricerca della città vivibile, Alinea, Firenze, pp. 75–90 (2009)
Tedesco, C.: Una politica europea per la città?: l’implementazione di urban a Bari, Bristol, Londra e Roma, vol. 104. FrancoAngeli (2005)
Pontrandolfi, P.: Contenuti strategici della pianificazione ed esperienze di partecipazione ai processi decisionali. Territorio della Ricerca su Insediamenti e Ambiente. Rivista internazionale di cultura urbanistica 3(6), 115–126 (2010)
Pontrandolfi, P.: La pianificazione del territorio extra-urbano di Potenza. Aestimum (30) (2009)
Cerreta, M., Inglese, P., Manzi, M.L.: A multi-methodological decision-making process for cultural landscapes evaluation: the green lucania project. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 216, 578–590 (2016)
Scorza, F., Pontrandolfi, P.: Citizen participation and technologies: the CAST architecture. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9156, pp. 747–755. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Las Casas, G., Murgante, B., Scorza, F.: Regional local development strategies benefiting from open data and open tools and an outlook on the renewable energy sources contribution. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R. (eds.) Smart Energy in the Smart City, pp. 275–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
Las Casas, G.B.: Processo di decisione e processo di Piano. In: Clemente, F. (a cura di) Pianificazione del Territorio e sistema informativo. FrancoAngeli, Milano (1984)
Las Casas, G.B.: L’etica della Razionalità. Urbanistica e Informazioni, vol 144, (1995). ISSN 0392-5005
Las Casas, G.B., Sansone, A.: Un approccio rinnovato alla razionalità nel piano. In: Depilano, G. (a cura di) Politiche e strumenti per il recupero urbano, EdicomEdizioni, Monfalcone (2004)
Las Casas, G.B., Scorza, F.: Un approccio “context-based” e “valutazione integrata” per il futuro della programmazione operativa regionale in Europa”. In: Lo Sviluppo Territoriale Nell’economia Della Conoscenza: Teorie, Attori Strategie, Collana Scienze Regionali, 41 (2009)
Aune, J.B.: Logical framework approach. Dev. Methods Approaches 214 (2000)
Bakewell, O., Garbutt, A.: The Use and Abuse of the Logical Framework Approach, vol. 27. Stockholm, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) (2005)
Coleman, G.: Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Proj. Appraisal 2, 251–259 (1987)
Wilson, A.: New roles for urban models: planning for the long term. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 3(1), 48–57 (2016). doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1109474
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pontrandolfi, P., Scorza, F. (2016). Sustainable Urban Regeneration Policy Making: Inclusive Participation Practice. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2016. ICCSA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42110-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42111-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)