iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40530-8_11
On the Operationalization of Graph Queries with Generalized Discrimination Networks | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

On the Operationalization of Graph Queries with Generalized Discrimination Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph Transformation (ICGT 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9761))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Graph queries have lately gained increased interest due to application areas such as social networks, biological networks, or model queries. For the relational database case the relational algebra and generalized discrimination networks have been studied to find appropriate decompositions into subqueries and ordering of these subqueries for query evaluation or incremental updates of queries. For graph database queries however there is no formal underpinning yet that allows us to find such suitable operationalizations. Consequently, we suggest a simple operational concept for the decomposition of arbitrary complex queries into simpler subqueries and the ordering of these subqueries in form of generalized discrimination networks for graph queries inspired by the relational case. The approach employs graph transformation rules for the nodes of the network and thus we can employ the underlying theory. We further show that the proposed generalized discrimination networks have the same expressive power as nested graph conditions.

This work was partially developed in the course of the project Correct Model Transformations II (GI 765/1-2), which is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is to be noted that a simple record as provided by an SQL-statement is also a special form of graph where no links are included.

  2. 2.

    While in practice the requested number of answers is often limited to a fixed upper bound of answers, for our more theoretical considerations in this paper, we can assume w.l.o.g. that all matches of L for G that fulfill the additional properties that must hold are building the correct set of answers.

  3. 3.

    W.l.o.g. we restrict our notion of condition satisfaction to the existence of monomorphisms. In particular, in [12] it is shown how to translate conditions relying on general morphism matching/satisfaction into equivalent conditions relying on monomorphism matching/satisfaction and the other way round.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V. (eds.): Foundations of Databases: The Logical Level, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angles, R.: A comparison of current graph database models. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 171–177. IEEE (April 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, B., Lambers, L., Dyck, J., Birth, S., Giese, H.: Iterative development of consistency-preserving rule-based refactorings. In: Cabot, J., Visser, E. (eds.) ICMT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6707, pp. 123–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergmann, G., Ökrös, A., Ráth, I., Varró, D., Varró, G.: Incremental pattern matching in the viatra model transformation system. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Graph and Model Transformations, GRaMoT 2008, pp. 25–32. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beyhl, T., Blouin, D., Giese, H., Lambers, L.: On the Operationalization of Graph Queries with Generalized Discrimination Networks. Technical report 106, Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beyhl, T., Giese, H.: Incremental view maintenance for deductive graph databases using generalized discrimination networks. In: Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, Graphs as Models 2016 (2016, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bunke, H., Glauser, T., Tran, T.H.: An efficient implementation of graph grammars based on the RETE matching algorithm. In: Kreowski, H.-J., Ehrig, H., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Graph Grammars 1990. LNCS, vol. 532, pp. 174–189. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Council, L.D.B.: LDBC Social Network Benchmark (SNB) - First Public Draft Release v0.2.2 (2015). https://github.com/ldbc/ldbc_snb_docs/blob/master/LDBC_SNB_v0.2.2.pdf

  9. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Forgy, C.L.: Rete: a fast algorithm for the many pattern/many object pattern match problem. Artif. Intell. 19(1), 17–37 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giese, H., Hildebrandt, S., Seibel, A.: Improved flexibility and scalability by interpreting story diagrams. In: Magaria, T., Padberg, J., Taentzer, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques, vol. 18. Electronic Communications of the EASST (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habel, A., Pennemann, K.H.: Correctness of high-level transformation systems relative to nested conditions. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 19, 1–52 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanson, E.N., Bodagala, S., Chadaga, U.: Trigger condition testing and view maintenance using optimized discrimination networks. Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 14(2), 261–280 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He, H., Singh, A.K.: Graphs-at-a-time: query language and access methods for graph databases. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 405–418. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poskitt, C.M., Plump, D.: Verifying monadic second-order properties of graph programs. In: Giese, H., König, B. (eds.) ICGT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8571, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wood, P.T.: Query languages for graph databases. SIGMOD Rec. 41(1), 50–60 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Johannes Dyck for his contribution to our discussions and feedback to draft versions of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Holger Giese or Leen Lambers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beyhl, T., Blouin, D., Giese, H., Lambers, L. (2016). On the Operationalization of Graph Queries with Generalized Discrimination Networks. In: Echahed, R., Minas, M. (eds) Graph Transformation. ICGT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40530-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40530-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40529-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40530-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics