iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_10
Modelling Attitudes to Climate Change — An Order Effect and a Test Between Alternatives | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Modelling Attitudes to Climate Change — An Order Effect and a Test Between Alternatives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantum Interaction (QI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8951))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Quantum-like models can be fruitfully used to model attitude change in a social context. Next steps require data, and higher dimensional models. Here, we discuss an exploratory study that demonstrates an order effect when three question sets about Climate Beliefs, Political Affiliation and Attitudes Towards Science are presented in different orders within a larger study of \(n=533\) subjects. A quantum-like model seems possible, and we propose a new experiment which could be used to test between three possible models for this scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Australian_federal_elections for the actual margins.

References

  1. Petty, R.E., Wegener, D.T.: Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 323–390. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seiter, R.H., Gass, J.S.: Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, J.: Cognitive Dissonance: 50 Years of a Classic Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bond, R., Smith, P.B.: Culture and conformity. Psychol. Bull. 119, 111–137 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R.: Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102, 4–27 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boschetti, F., Richert, C., Walker, I., Price, J., Dutra, L.: Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modelling. Ecol. Model. 247, 98–111 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., Cohen, G.L.: The second national risk and culture study: making sense of - and making progress in - the American culture war of fact. Technical report, Yale Law School (2007). Public Law Working Paper No. 154. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1017189 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017189

  8. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G.E., Oberauer, K.: The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLOS ONE 8, e75637 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer, New York (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaiken, S.M.: The heuristic model of persuasion. In: Zanna, P., Olson, J.M., Herman, C.P. (eds.) Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 5, pp. 3–39. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481), 453–458 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitto, K., Boschetti, F., Bruza, P.: The quantum inspired modelling of changing attitudes and self-organising societies. In: Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) QI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7620, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitto, K., Boschetti, F.: The effects of personality in a social context. In: Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N., Wachsmuth, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2740–2745. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kitto, K., Boschetti, F.: Attitudes, ideologies and self-organisation: information load minimisation in multi-agent decision making. Adv. Complex Syst. 16(2 & 3), 1350029 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the neo personality inventory. Psychol. Assess. 4(1), 5–13 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: Correlated knowledge: an epistemic-logic view on quantum entanglement. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49(12), 3005–3021 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Blutner, R.: Questions and answers in an orthoalgebraic approach. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 21(3), 237–277 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Graben, P.B.: Order effects in dynamic semantics. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6(1), 67–73 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Busemeyer, J., Bruza, P.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 689–710 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leviston, Z., Price, J., Malkin, S., McCrea, R.: Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: interim report. Technical report, CSIRO, Perth, Australia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter Bruza for his many contributions to early discussions about this work, and the possible use of the QQ model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsty Kitto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kitto, K., Sonnenburg, L., Boschetti, F., Walker, I. (2015). Modelling Attitudes to Climate Change — An Order Effect and a Test Between Alternatives. In: Atmanspacher, H., Bergomi, C., Filk, T., Kitto, K. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8951. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15930-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15931-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics