iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_29
Preserving Strong Equivalence while Forgetting | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Preserving Strong Equivalence while Forgetting

  • Conference paper
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8761))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A variety of proposals for forgetting in logic programs under different semantics have emerged that satisfy differing sets of properties considered desirable. Despite the achieved progress in devising approaches that capture an increasing number of these properties, the idea that the result of forgetting should preserve the meaning of the initial program for the remaining, non-forgotten, atoms, has not yet been captured. In particular, the existing proposals may not preserve dependency relations between such atoms that are given by the structure of the program. In logic programs, these relations are captured by strong equivalence, but, preserving strong equivalence of two different programs while forgetting does not suffice. Rather, strong equivalence relativized to the remaining atoms should be preserved between the original program and the one that results from forgetting. In this paper, we overcome this deficiency by formalizing the property that captures this maintenance of relations while forgetting, and at the same time a general semantic definition for such a forgetting for arbitrary logic programs. Then, we study forgetting for normal programs under the well-founded semantics, and for programs with double negation under the answer set semantics. In both cases, we focus on efficient syntax-based algorithms that only manipulate the rules in which changes are effectively necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alferes, J.J., Knorr, M., Wang, K.: Forgetting under the well-founded semantics. In: Cabalar, P., Son, T.C. (eds.) LPNMR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8148, pp. 36–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou, G., Eiter, T., Wang, K.: Forgetting for defeasible logic. In: Bjørner, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-18 2012. LNCS, vol. 7180, pp. 77–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brass, S., Dix, J.: Semantics of (disjunctive) logic programs based on partial evaluation. J. Log. Program. 40(1), 1–46 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dantsin, E., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Voronkov, A.: Complexity and expressive power of logic programming. ACM Comput. Surv. 33(3), 374–425 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Woltran, S.: Semantical characterizations and complexity of equivalences in answer set programming. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 8(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter, T., Wang, K.: Semantic forgetting in answer set programming. Artif. Intell. 172(14), 1644–1672 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelder, A.V., Ross, K.A., Schlipf, J.S.: The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. J. ACM 38(3), 620–650 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Comput. 9(3-4), 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite. Artif. Intell. 174(15), 1093–1141 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Strongly equivalent logic programs. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 2(4), 526–541 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lifschitz, V., Tang, L.R., Turner, H.: Nested expressions in logic programs. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 25(3-4), 369–389 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, F., Reiter, R.: Forget it! In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Relevance, pp. 154–159 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Foundations for uniform interpolation and forgetting in expressive description logics. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 16-22, pp. 989–995. IJCAI/AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, M.: Forgetting for answer set programs revisited. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) IJCAI 2013, Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China, August 3-9, IJCAI/AAAI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, M.: Forgetting in logic programs under strong equivalence. In: Brewka, G., Eiter, T., McIlraith, S.A. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, KR 2012, pp. 643–647. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Z., Wang, K., Topor, R.W., Pan, J.Z.: Forgetting for knowledge bases in DL-Lite. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 58(1-2), 117–151 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Woltran, S.: Characterizations for relativized notions of equivalence in answer set programming. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 161–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong, K.S.: Forgetting in Logic Programs. Ph.D. thesis, The University of New South Wales (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, Y., Foo, N.Y.: Solving logic program conflict through strong and weak forgettings. Artif. Intell. 170(8-9), 739–778 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y.: Knowledge forgetting: Properties and applications. Artif. Intell. 173(16-17), 1525–1537 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y.: Bounded forgetting. In: Burgard, W., Roth, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2011, San Francisco, California, USA, August 7-11. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Knorr, M., Alferes, J.J. (2014). Preserving Strong Equivalence while Forgetting. In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11558-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics