iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08644-6_14
On Determination of Thresholds in Three-Way Approximation of Many-Valued NM-Logic | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

On Determination of Thresholds in Three-Way Approximation of Many-Valued NM-Logic

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8536))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Approximation of a many-valued logic by a logic with less number of truth values is an important topic. Three-way approximation based on a pair of thresholds is an example considered by Yao. However, the determination of thresholds has not been investigated yet. In this paper, we aim to study this issue in the context of many-valued NM-logic with the standard valuation domain \({\{0,\frac{1}{n-1},\frac{2}{n-1},\cdots,\frac{n-2}{n-1},1\}}\). The main result is that when n is odd, the thresholds for three-way decision is uniquely determined. When n is even, there is actually no three-way decision, but two-way decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Information Sciences 180, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao, Y.Y.: The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models. Information Sciences 181, 1080–1096 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, H.X., Zhou, X.Z.: Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: A three-way view decision model. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 4, 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, D., Yao, Y.Y., Li, T.R.: Three-way investment decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 4, 66–74 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jia, X., Zheng, K., Li, W., Liu, T., Shang, L.: Three-way decisions solution to filter spam email: An empirical study. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7413, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, X.P., Yao, J.T.: Modelling multi-agent three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Fundamenta Informaticae 115, 157–171 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, H., Wang, Y.: Three-way decisions method for overlapping clustering. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7413, pp. 277–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decision: An interpretation of rules in rough set theory. In: Wen, P., Li, Y., Polkowski, L., Yao, Y., Tsumoto, S., Wang, G. (eds.) RSKT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5589, pp. 642–649. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, B., Yao, Y.Y., Luo, J.G.: A three-way decision approach to email spam filtering. In: Farzindar, A., Kešelj, V. (eds.) Canadian AI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6085, pp. 28–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Yao, Y.Y.: An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7413, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottwald, S.: A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics. Research Studies Press, Baldock (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Esteva, F., Godo, L.: Monoidal t-norm based logic: towards a logic for left-continuous t-norms. Fuzzy sets and systems 124(3), 271–288 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, G.J., Zhou, H.J.: Introduction to mathematical logic and resolution principle. Science Press, Beijing (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ciucci, D., Dubois, D.: Three-Valued Logics, Uncertainty Management and Rough Sets. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XVII. LNCS, vol. 8375, pp. 1–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

She, Y. (2014). On Determination of Thresholds in Three-Way Approximation of Many-Valued NM-Logic. In: Cornelis, C., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ślȩzak, D., Ruiz, E.M., Bello, R., Shang, L. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8536. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08644-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08644-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08643-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08644-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics