iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53082-1_7
Preserving Accuracy in Federated Learning via Equitable Model and Efficient Aggregation | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Preserving Accuracy in Federated Learning via Equitable Model and Efficient Aggregation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (RTIP2R 2023)

Abstract

Machine learning has revolutionized research by extracting complicated patterns from complex data, particularly in healthcare and medical imaging, where accurate diagnosis is critical. The concept of federated learning has gained popularity in the field of machine learning as a viable technique for addressing privacy issues in distributed settings. This research explores federated learning in healthcare, demonstrating its capability to achieve results comparable to centralized data while enhancing the accuracy of deep learning models for clinical data interpretation. To ensure reliable model performance during federated learning rounds, this study introduces a proactive mechanism for coordinating server updates with equitable client modifications. The equitable model, designed to reduce accuracy fluctuations, consistently improves accuracy across multiple training rounds on a non-IID dataset. We achieved smooth accuracy improvement by implementing the novel Equitable model, resulting in robust model development. As healthcare AI continues to advance, federated learning emerges as a critical tool for developing precise prediction models while preserving patient data privacy and aligning with increasingly strict data standards worldwide, such as GDPR regulations. This strategic approach not only promotes ethical, efficient, and secure progress in medical research and practice, but it also emphasizes the importance of protecting patient data privacy while utilizing machine learning’s potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brophy, E., De Vos, M., Boylan, G., Ward, T.: Estimation of continuous blood pressure from PPG via a federated learning approach. Sensors 21(18), 6311 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dayan, I., et al.: Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 27(10), 1735–1743 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, P.: The rationale for learning communities and learning community models. Research Square (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang, J., Lu, Z.: Learning fairness in multi-agent systems. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaissis, G., et al.: End-to-end privacy preserving deep learning on multi-institutional medical imaging. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3(6), 473–484 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, R., et al.: Blockchain-federated-learning and deep learning models for COVID-19 detection using CT imaging. IEEE Sens. J. 21(14), 16301–16314 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A., Smith, V.: Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Sig. Process. Mag. 37(3), 50–60 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linardos, A., Kushibar, K., Walsh, S., Gkontra, P., Lekadir, K.: Federated learning for multi-center imaging diagnostics: a simulation study in cardiovascular disease. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 3551 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makkar, A., Santosh, K.C.: Securefed: Federated learning empowered medical imaging technique to detect COVID-19 using chest x-rays. Research Square (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marfoq, O., Neglia, G., Vidal, R., Kameni, L.: Personalized federated learning through local memorization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 15070–15092. PMLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial intelligence and statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Min, X., Bin, Yu., Wang, F.: Predictive modeling of the hospital readmission risk from patients’ claims data using machine learning: a case study on copd. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 2362 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nandi, A., Xhafa, F.: A federated learning method for real-time emotion state classification from multi-modal streaming. Methods 204, 340–347 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perez, M.V., et al.: Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. New Engl. J. Med. 381(20), 1909–1917 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahinbas, K., Catak, F.O.: Secure multi-party computation-based privacy-preserving data analysis in healthcare IoT systems. In: Kose, U., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. (eds.) Interpretable Cognitive Internet of Things for Healthcare, pp. 57–72. Springer, Cham (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08637-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Tedeschini, B.C., et al.: Decentralized federated learning for healthcare networks: a case study on tumor segmentation. IEEE Access 10, 8693–8708 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo, J.H., et al.: Personalized federated learning with clustering: non-IID heart rate variability data application. In: 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1046–1051. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, J., Li, C., Robles-Kelly, A., Kankanhalli, M.: Hierarchically fair federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10386 (2020)

  19. Zhang, W., et al.: Dynamic-fusion-based federated learning for COVID-19 detection. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(21), 15884–15891 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muntazir Mehdi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mehdi, M., Makkar, A., Conway, M., Sama, L. (2024). Preserving Accuracy in Federated Learning via Equitable Model and Efficient Aggregation. In: Santosh, K., et al. Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. RTIP2R 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53082-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53082-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53081-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53082-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics