Abstract
Many learning technologies are now able to support both user-customization of the content and automated personalization of the experience based on user activities. However, there is a tradeoff between customization and personalization: the more control an educator or learner has over the parameters that define the experience, the more difficult it is to develop learning analytic models that can reliably assess learning and adapt the system accordingly. In this paper, we present a novel QE method for automatically generating a learning analytic model for the land-use planning simulation iPlan, which enables users to construct custom local simulations of socio-environmental issues. Specifically, this method employs data simulation and network analysis to construct a measurement space using nothing but log data. This space can be used to analyze users’ problem-solving processes in a context where normative measurement criteria cannot be specified in advance. In doing so, we argue that QE methods can be developed and employed even in the absence of rich qualitative data, facilitating thick(er) descriptions of complex processes based on relatively thin records of users’ activities in digital systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For readers who may be wondering why we don’t simply apply the SVD to the set of normalized vectors directly and omit the step involving the construction of a dimension for each stakeholder, this is in part because SVDs do not perform well on relatively sparse matrices, i.e., matrices in which many or most of the coefficients are zeroes [17]. Attempts to do this produced dimensions with low variance explained (generally < 3%) and poor co-registration (see §3.3). While there are many techniques specifically designed to decompose sparse matrices, we took an approach, inspired by means rotation in epistemic network analysis (ENA), that both addresses the sparse matrix problem and facilitates meaningful interpretation of the resulting space based on stakeholder preferences, which is useful given that the goal in iPlan is to maximize stakeholder satisfaction.
References
Dede, C.: Customization in immersive learning environments: implications for digital teaching environments. In: Dede, C., Richards, J., (eds.) Digital Teaching Platforms: Customizing Classroom Learning for Each Student, pp. 282–297. Teachers College Press (2012)
Matuk, C.F., Linn, M.C., Eylon, B.-S.: Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. Instr. Sci. 43, 229–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1
Shemshack, A., Spector, J.M.: A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learn. Environ. 7, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
Littenberg-Tobias, J., Beheshti, E., Staudt, C.: To customize or not to customize? exploring science teacher customization in an online lesson portal. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 53, 349–367 (2016)
Zhang, L., Basham, J.D., Yang, S.: Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: a research synthesis. Educ. Res. Rev. 31, 100339 (2020)
Barab, S.A., Luehmann, A.L.: Building sustainable science curriculum: acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Sci. Educ. 87, 454–467 (2003)
Elsawah, S., et al.: Eight grand challenges in socio-environmental systems modeling. Socio-Environ. Syst. Model. 2 (2020)
Gruenewald, D.A.: Foundations of place: a multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. Am. Educ. Res. J. 40, 619–654 (2003)
Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Shaffer, D.W.: Location, location, location: the effects of place in place-based simulations. In: Lund, K., Niccolai, G., Lavoué, E., Hmelo-Silver, C., Gweon, G., Baker, M. (eds.) A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings: 13th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019, pp. 152–159 (2019)
Smith, G.A., Sobel, D.: Place- and Community-Based Education in Schools. Routledge (2014)
Ruis, A.R., et al.: iPlan (2020). https://app.i-plan.us/
Ruis, A.R., et al.: Localizing Socio-Environmental Problem Solving. In: Weinberger, A., Chen, W., Hernández-Leo, D., Chen, B., (eds.) International Collaboration toward Educational Innovation for All: Overarching Research, Development, and Practices: 15th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2022, pp. 459–462. International Society for the Learning Sciences (2022)
wiecki, Z., Eagan, B.R.: The Role of Data Simulation in Quantitative Ethnography. In: Damşa, C., Barany, A., (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Fourth International Conference, ICQE 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 October 2022, Proceedings, pp. 87–100. Springer (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_7
Ruis, A.R., et al.: Iplan: A Platform for Constructing Localized, Reduced-Form Models of Land-Use Impacts (2023)
Xiang, W.-N., Clarke, K.C.: The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 30, 885–909 (2003)
Tagliafierro, C., Boeri, M., Longo, A., Hutchinson, W.G.: Stated preference methods and landscape ecology indicators: an example of transdisciplinarity in landscape economic valuation. Ecol. Econ. 127, 11–22 (2016)
Duff, I.S., Erisman, A.M., Reid, J.K.: Direct Methods for Sparse Matrices. Oxford University Press (2017)
Tan, Y., Ruis, A.R., Marquart, C.L., Cai, Z., Knowles, M., Shaffer, D.W.: Ordered Network Analysis. In: Damşa, C., Barany, A., (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Fourth International Conference, ICQE 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 October 2022, Proceedings, pp. 101–116. Springer (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_8
Bowman, D., et al.: The mathematical foundations of epistemic network analysis. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 91–105. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_7
Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Theories all the way across: the role of theory in learning analytics and the case for unified methods. In: Bartimote, K., Howard, S., Gašević, D., (eds.) Theory Informing and Arising from Learning Analytics. In press. Springer (2023)
Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Is QE just ENA? In: Damşa, C., Barany, A., (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: 4th International Conference, ICQE 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–19 October 2022, Proceedings, pp. 71–86. Springer (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31726-2_6
Siebert-Evenstone, A.: A qualitative analysis of connection-making in the NGSS. In: Wasson, B., Zörgő, S., (eds.) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Third International Conference, ICQE 2021, Virtual Event, 6–11 November Proceedings, pp. 105–123. Springer (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_7
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (DRL-1661036, DRL-2100320, DRL-2201723, DRL-2225240), the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The opinions, findings, and conclusions do not reflect the views of the funding agencies, cooperating institutions, or other individuals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruis, A.R. et al. (2023). Thin Data, Thick Description: Modeling Socio-Environmental Problem-Solving Trajectories in Localized Land-Use Simulations. In: Arastoopour Irgens, G., Knight, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47014-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47013-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47014-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)