iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21422-6_24
Towards an Ontological Approach to Business Continuity Assessment | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Towards an Ontological Approach to Business Continuity Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web (KGSWC 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1686))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

Business Continuity (BC) methods use threat identification, continuous improvement, and recommendations to ensure running the organization's main activities in case of disruptive events. Information Systems, on the other hand, are increasingly based on service-based structures and are seen as fundamental instruments to guarantee business continuity. The paper presents the ontological foundations for representing business continuity semantics, which are based on a widely adopted information systems research framework. The overall aim of this work is to provide BC with formal semantics and business people with an emerging informal BC modeling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elmqvist, T., et al.: Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2(4), 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1

  2. Altay, N., Green, W.G.: OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175(1), 475–493 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamissoko, D., et al.: Continuous and multidimensional assessment of resilience based on functionality analysis for interconnected systems. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15(4), 427–442 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1546327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amara, O.B., Kamissoko, D., Benaben, F., Fijalkow, Y.: Hardware architecture for the evaluation of BCP robustness indicators through massive data collection and interpretation, p. 8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson, C.A.: Business continuity management & guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Information Security Curriculum Development Annual Conference, InfoSecCD 2009, Kennesaw, GA, pp. 114–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1940976.1940999

  6. Lindström, J., Hägerfors, A.: A model for explaining strategic IT-and information security to senior management, vol. 2009, p. 13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kajava, J., Anttila, J., Varonen, R., Savola, R., Roning, J.: Senior executives commitment to information security - from motivation to responsibility. In: 2006 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, November 2006, vol. 2, pp. 1519–1522. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIAS.2006.295314

  8. Anttila, J., Kajava, J., Varonen, R.: Balanced integration of information security into business management. In: Proceedings 30th Euromicro Conference, September 2004, pp. 558–564 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.2004.1333422

  9. Lindström, J., Samuelsson, S., Hägerfors, A.: Business continuity planning methodology. Disaster Prevent. Manage. Int. J. 19(2), 243–255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011038039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asnar, Y., Giorgini, P.: Analyzing business continuity through a multi-layers model. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 212–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Business Continuity Management and Resilience Framework, p. 14

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bialas, A.: Ontological approach to the business continuity management system development, pp. 386–392 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajgoric, N.: Information technologies for business continuity: an implementation framework. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 14(5), 450–466 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/09685220610717754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: NeOn methodology for building ontology networks: a scenario-based methodology, p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology, p. 25

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alshehab, A., Alazemi, N., Alhakem, H.A.: Semantic integration sharing for egovernment domains ontology: Design and implementation using owl. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 97, 1820–1831 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Nicola, A., Villani, M.L.: Smart city ontologies and their applications: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 13(10), 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105578

  19. Edgington, T., Choi, B., Henson, K., Raghu, T.S., Vinze, A.: Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing. Commun. ACM 47(11), 85–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1029496.1029499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reuvid, J.: The Secure Online Business Handbook: A Practical Guide to Risk Management and Business Continuity. Kogan Page Publishers (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, J.: Business Continuity. Found. Manage. 2(2), 2010. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10238-012-0031-x

  22. De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M.: A lightweight methodology for rapid ontology engineering. Commun. ACM 59, 79–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niemimaa, M., Järveläinen, J., Heikkilä, M., Heikkilä, J.: Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 49, 208–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oussema Ben Amara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ben Amara, O., de Nicola, A., Kamissoko, D., Benaben, F. (2022). Towards an Ontological Approach to Business Continuity Assessment. In: Villazón-Terrazas, B., Ortiz-Rodriguez, F., Tiwari, S., Sicilia, MA., Martín-Moncunill, D. (eds) Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web . KGSWC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1686. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21422-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21422-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21421-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21422-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics