iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82529-4_42
Assessing mHealth Applications for Medical Prescription: A Case Study | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Assessing mHealth Applications for Medical Prescription: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Online Engineering and Society 4.0 (REV 2021)

Abstract

Smartphones and mobile health applications could be very helpful to support patients with chronic non communicable disease in following the complex protocols needed to manage their diseases. A number of mobile health applications have been developed to ease self-monitoring of symptoms, vital signs and physical activity; regular medication intake; and education of patients and caregivers about the relevant aspects of the disease. However, several barriers make it difficult to fully exploit their technological potential and produce clear clinical evidence of their effectiveness. App providers do not help users distinguish between useless/dangerous apps and valid solutions. The latter are few and often characterized by rapid obsolescence, lack of interactivity and lack of authoritative information. Then, systematic assessments can help physicians and researchers to rank Apps, support their continuous improvement, find the ‘best candidate for a specific health problem’ in a repeatable manner and pave the way for well-grounded and fruitful discussion on their effectiveness. To this purpose, the authors discuss a flexible method and a supporting tool to assess mobile health application for chronic diseases, based on the Internatinal Measurement System (IMS) scoring system, on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and other minor customizations. The method has been co-designed by IT experts, health professional and patients to guarantee the due rigor while including, from the beginning, privacy and confidentiality aspects as well as ease of use, sustainability and significance of results. To exemplify the application of the proposed method, the assessment of a real mobile health application is discussed in the last part of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Report by the Secretariat, “mHealth: use of mobile wireless technologies for public health.” World Health Organization, May 27, 2016. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB139/B139_8-en.pdf. Accessed 06 Sep 2020

  2. WHO Global Observatory for eHealth and World Health Organization, MHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organization, Geneva (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. “Digital 2020: Social Media Users Pass the 4 Billion Mark as Globl Adoption Soars,” We Are Social. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/10/social-media-users-pass-the-4-billion-mark-as-global-adoption-soars. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

  4. “Developing A Set Of Usability Guidelines For Mobile Health Applications.” https://www.meddeviceonline.com/doc/developing-a-set-of-usability-guidelines-for-mobile-health-applications-0001. Accessed 07 Sep 2020

  5. Zapata BC, Fernández-Alemán JL, Idri A, Toval A (2015) Empirical studies on usability of mhealth apps: a systematic literature review. J Med Syst 39(2):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kvedar JC, Fogel AL, Elenko E, Zohar D (2006) Digital medicine’s march on chronic disease. Nat Biotechnol 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3495. Art no 3

  7. Ganguli A, Clewell J, Shillington AC (2016) The impact of patient support programs on adherence, clinical, humanistic, and economic patient outcomes: a targeted systematic review. Patient Prefer. Adherence 10:711

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj. Accessed 04 Jan 2021

  9. “European Commission - GREEN PAPER on mobile Health - 2014.pdf.” https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2014/EN/1-2014-219-EN-F1-1.Pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2021

  10. Paglialonga A, Lugo A, Santoro E (2018) An overview on the emerging area of identification, characterization, and assessment of health apps. J Biomed Inform 83:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. “Xcertia mHelth App Guidellines - 2019 final.pdf.” https://www.himss.org/sites/hde/files/media/file/2020/04/17/xcertia-guidelines-2019-final.pdf. Accessed 07 Sep 2020

  12. daVinciDTx, “Terapie Digitali e Farmaco, sostituzione o combinazione?,” TerapieDigitali, July 11, 2020. https://terapiedigitali.davincidtx.com/terapie-digitali-e-farmaco/. Accessed 04 Jan 2021

  13. Krebs P, Duncan DT (2015) Health app use among us mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR MHealth UHealth 3(4):e101. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou L, Bao J, Setiawan IMA, Saptono A, Parmanto B (2019) The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): development and validation study. JMIR MHealth UHealth 7(4):e11500. https://doi.org/10.2196/11500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang C, Zhang X, Halstead-Nussloch R (2014) Assessment metrics, challenges, and strategies for mobile health apps. Issues Inf Syst 15

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M (2015) Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR MHealth UHealth 3(1):e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC (2011) Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 8(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Joe J, Demiris G (2013) Older adults and mobile phones for health: a review. J Biomed Inform 46(5):947–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hern, A., et al.: “Infographic: Are seniors as crazy for the internet as the younger generation?,” Techaeris, March 22, 2019. https://techaeris.com/2019/03/22/infographic-are-seniors-as-crazy-for-the-internet-as-the-younger-generation/. Accessed 05 Jan 2021

  20. Mortara A, et al (2020) Would you prescribe mobile health apps for heart failure self-care? an integrated review of commercially available mobile technology for heart failure patients. Card Fail Rev 6. https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2019.11

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario A. Bochicchio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bochicchio, M.A., Vaira, L., Mortara, A., De Maria, R. (2022). Assessing mHealth Applications for Medical Prescription: A Case Study. In: Auer, M.E., Bhimavaram, K.R., Yue, XG. (eds) Online Engineering and Society 4.0. REV 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 298. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82529-4_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics