iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60884-2_30
How to Decide Which Cracks Should Be Repaired First: Theoretical Explanation of Empirical Formulas | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

How to Decide Which Cracks Should Be Repaired First: Theoretical Explanation of Empirical Formulas

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Soft Computing (MICAI 2020)

Abstract

Due to stress, cracks appear in constructions: cracks appear in buildings, bridges, pavements, among other structures. In the long run, cracks need to be repaired. However, our resources are limited, so we need to decide which cracks are more dangerous. To make this decision, we need to be able to predict how different cracks will grow. There are several empirical formulas describing crack growth. In this paper, we show that by using scale invariance, we can provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical formulas. The existence of such an explanation makes us confident that the existing empirical formulas can (and should) be used in the design of the corresponding automatic decision systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aczel, J., Dhombres, J.: Functional Equations in Several Variables. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigerelle, M., Iost, A.: Bootstrap analysis of FCGR, application to the Paris relationship and to lifetime prediction. Int. J. Fatigue 21, 299–307 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broek, D.: Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Martinus Lojhoff Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpinteri, A., Paggi, M.: Self-similarity and crack growth instability in the correlation between the Paris’ constants. Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 1041–1053 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortie, M.B., Garrett, G.G.: On the correlation between the \(C\) and \(m\) in the Paris equation for fatigue crack propagation. J. Eng. Fract. Mech. 30(1), 49–58 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Little, D., Allen, D., Bhasin, A.: Modeling and Design of Flexible Pavements and Materials. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Paris, P.S., Erdogan, F.: A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J. Basic Eng. 85(4), 528–534 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugno, N., Ciavarella, M., Cornetti, P., Carpinteri, A.: A generalized Paris’ law for fatigue crack growth. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 54, 1333–1349 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez Velasquez, E.D., Kreinovich, V., Kosheleva, O., Hoang Phuong, N.: How to Estimate the Stiffness of the Multi-Layer Road Based on Properties of Layers: Symmetry-Based Explanation for Odemark’s Equation, University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report UTEP-CS-20-49 (2020) http://www.cs.utep.edu/vladik/2020/tr20-49.pdf

  10. Sheskin, D.E.: Handbook of Parametric and Non-Parametric Statistical Procedures. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, UK (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science) and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence).

The authors are greatly thankful to Ildar Batyrshin for his encouragement and to the anonymous referees for their useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Velasquez, E.D.R., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V. (2020). How to Decide Which Cracks Should Be Repaired First: Theoretical Explanation of Empirical Formulas. In: Martínez-Villaseñor, L., Herrera-Alcántara, O., Ponce, H., Castro-Espinoza, F.A. (eds) Advances in Soft Computing. MICAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12468. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60884-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60884-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60883-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60884-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics